《公司为何必须开放商业模式外文文献翻译》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《公司为何必须开放商业模式外文文献翻译（16页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、毕业设计（论文）外文翻译外文题目：Why companies should have open business models译文题目：公司为何必须开放商业模式文献出处：Sloan Management Review, Winter 2007, 48 (2): 22-28外文作者：Henry Chesbrough字数统计：英文2818单词，14469字符；中文4184汉字外文文献：Why companies should have open business modelsInnovation is becoming an increasingly open process thanks to
2、a growing division of labor. One company develops a novel idea but does not bring it to market. Instead, the company decides to partner with or sell the idea to another party, which then commercializes it. To get the most out of this new system of innovation, companies must open their business model
3、s by actively searching for and exploiting outside ideas and by allowing unused internal technologies to flow to the outside, where other firms can unlock their latent economic potential. Lets be clear about what is meant by the term business model. In essence, a business model performs two importan
4、t functions: It creates value, and it captures a portion of that value. The first function requires the defining of a series of activities (from raw materials through to the final customer) that will yield a new product or service, with value being added throughout the various activities. The second
5、 function requires the establishing of a unique resource, asset or position within that series of activities in which the firm enjoys a competitive advantage.Open business models enable an organization to be more effective in creating as well as capturing value. They help create value by leveraging
6、many more ideas because of their inclusion of a variety of external concepts. They also allow greater value capture by utilizing a firms key asset, resource or position not only in that organizations own operations but also in other companies businesses.To appreciate the potential of this new approa
7、ch, consider the following names: Qualcomm Inc., the maker of cellular phone technology; Genzyme Corp., a biotechnology company; The Procter & Gamble Co., a consumer products corporation; and Chicago, the musical stage show and movie. This assortment might appear to be random, but they all have some
8、thing in common: Each required an open business model in which an idea traveled from invention to commercialization through at least two different companies, with the different parties involved dividing the work of innovation. Through the process, ideas and technologies were bought, sold, licensed o
9、r otherwise transferred, changing hands at least once in their journey to market.Qualcomm used to make its own cell phones and base stations but ceased doing so years ago.1 Now others manufacture those products, and Qualcomm just makes chips and sells licenses to its technologies, period. In fact, e
10、very phone that uses its technology is sold by a customer of Qualcomm, not by the company itself. Genzyme licenses technology from the outside and then develops it in-house. The company has turned these external ideas into an array of novel therapies that deliver important cures for previously untre
11、atable rare diseases. It has also built an impressive financial record in an industry in which profits have been difficult to achieve.Procter & Gamble has rejuvenated its growth through a program called Connect and Develop, which licenses or acquires products from other companies and brings them to
12、market as P&G brands. With early successes like the Crest SpinBrush, Olay Regenerist and Swiffer Dusters, P&G now actively seeks external ideas and technologies through an extensive network of scouts. Chicago, the often-revived musical, emerged out of a creative extension of a play written decades a
13、go that had gone out of print.3 Others saw the latent value within the work and revived it multiple times to yield a prize-winning show. And each time the show was revived, it was done by a different owner. A recent revival turned into an Academy Award winning movie in 2002.If these ideas were so va
14、luable, then the obvious question is: Why didnt the original owners figure out the best way to take them to market on their own? The answer goes to the very heart of why markets for innovation are so important. Different companies possess different assets, resources and market positions, and each ha
15、s a unique history.4 Because of that, companies look at opportunities differently. They will quickly recognize ideas that fit the pattern that has proven successful for them in the past, but they will struggle with concepts that require an unfamiliar configuration of assets, resources and positions.
16、 With innovation markets, ideas can flow out of places where they do not fit and find homes in companies where they do.Innovation InefficienciesIn many industries, markets for innovation have existed for a long time. In the chemical industry, for instance, compounds have often moved from one company to another.5 Historically, though, such markets have been highly inefficient. Even now, much of the exchange of technology and its associated in
