雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗

上传人:re****.1 文档编号:487061467 上传时间:2022-08-08 格式:DOC 页数:12 大小:63.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗_第1页
第1页 / 共12页
雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗_第2页
第2页 / 共12页
雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗_第3页
第3页 / 共12页
雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗_第4页
第4页 / 共12页
雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗_第5页
第5页 / 共12页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《雇主和雇员之间的自愿合作关系能够满足员工表达自我意愿的权力吗(12页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、本科毕业论文(设计)外文翻译题 目 民营企业人才储备计划的问题分析及对策研究 学 院 商学院 专 业 人力资源管理 班 级 学 号 学生姓名 指导教师 外文题目 Enhancing Employee Voice: Are Voluntary Employer Employee Partnerships Enough?外文出处 Journal of Business Ethics 外文作者 Harry J. Van Buren,Michelle Greenwood. 原文:Enhancing Employee Voice: Are Voluntary Employer Employee Part

2、nerships Enough?Harry J. Van Buren,Michelle GreenwoodSummary:One of the essential ethical issues in the employment relationship is the loss of employee voice. Many of the ways employees have previously exercised voice in the employment relationship have been rendered less effective by (1)the changin

3、g nature of work, (2) employer preferences for flexibility that often work to the disadvantage of employees, and (3) changes in public policy and institutional systems that have failed to protect workers. We will begin with a discussion of how work has changed in the last 20 years in countries like

4、Australia and the United States, and then take up the issue of employees as organizational stakeholders and the ethical duties that are owed them, with special attention given to issues of power. We will then consider whether voluntary action by employers such as social auditing is sufficient to ens

5、ure equity for employees, and conclude with a discussion of how changes in public policy might ensure greater fairness in the employment relationship by bringing employers and employees together in partnership. KEY WORDS: employment, unions, partnerships, consentMuch has changed in the employment re

6、lationship in the last 20 years. Work has become increasingly globalized. Returns to education for employees have increased; employees with low levels of education compete with many others worldwide for low wages while employees with high levels of education still experience wage increases. Companie

7、s in developed countries like Australia and the United States have increasingly moved into service-and information-oriented industries; manufacturing(including agriculture)has correspondingly become less important in such economies. Companies have increasingly moved away from stable, long-term emplo

8、yment relationships. For scholars interested in the intersection of ethics and employment practices, it is a most interesting time. One of the essential ethical issues in the employment relationship is the loss of employee voicethe ability of employees to raise concerns and to negotiate about the te

9、rms of exchange with their employers(including wages, working conditions, and so on)and to negotiate changes thereof. In the past, many employees exercised voice in the employment relationship through membership in a union that bargained collectively on their behalf. But unions have declined in impo

10、rtance in the private sector in a number of countries (Kochan, 2005)and in other countries the right to collective bargaining is little more than a chimera. In a number of countriesincluding Australia and the United Statesunionization rates have fallen over time (de Ruyter and Burgess,2003;Johnstone

11、et al.,2004;Kochan,2005),to the detriment of workers rights and abilities to exercise voice. For many employees, the loss of voice has meant that their relationships with employers are governed by contracts of adhesion, in which employers set terms of employment that employees can either take or lea

12、ve (Radin and Werhane,2003;Van Buren,2003).Most employeesunless their skills are perceived to be so rare and valuable that they possess significant market power or are covered by a union contractare unable to bargain over basic elements of the employment relationship, including wages, benefits, and

13、dispute resolution mechanisms(Blades,1967;Keeley,1983;LeRoy and uille,2002;Witt,2000).1Employees, in short, feel more insecure in their jobs because they are in fact less secure(Wallulis,1998). Often lost in discussions about the utility of changing employment patterns is a discussion of the ethical

14、 principles that should underpin employeremployee relationships. Much of the literature on employment practices has considered whether particular kinds of practices are good or bad for employers (Roehling et al.,2000) or employees (Berg, Kalleberg, and Appelbaum,2003;Guest and Conway , 1999).Our ana

15、lysis will begin with a discussion of how work has changed in the last 20 years in countries like Australia and the United States. We will then take up the issue of employees as organizational stakeholders and the ethical duties that are owed them, with special attention given to issues of power. We will then consider whether voluntary action by em

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 营销创新

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号