《2006--2010考研英语历年真题及答案》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2006--2010考研英语历年真题及答案（79页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 2大家版词典级 31 年考研英语真题及答案2010 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题SectionSection I I UseUse ofof EnglishEnglishDirections:Directions:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWERANSWER SHEETSHEET 1 1. (10 points)In 1924 Americas National Research Council sent tw
2、o engineers to supervise a series of industrial experiments at a large telephone- parts factory called the Hawthorne Plant near Chicago. It hoped they would learn how stop-floor lighting workers productivity. 大1家 Instead, the studies ended giving their name to the “Hawthorne 大2家 effect“, the extreme
3、ly influential idea that the very to being 大3家 experimented upon changed subjects behavior.The idea arose because of the behavior of the women in 大4家 the Hawthorne plant. According to of the experiments, their 大5家 hourly output rose when lighting was increased, but also when it was dimmed. It did no
4、t what was done in the experiment; 大6家大7家 something was changed, productivity rose. A(n) that they were 大8家 being experimented upon seemed to be to alter workers behavior 大9家itself.大10家After several decades, the same data were to econometric 大11家 the analysis. Hawthorne experiments has another surpr
5、ise store the descriptions on record, no systematic was found that 大12家大13家 levels of productivity were related to changes in lighting.It turns out that peculiar way of conducting the experiments may be have let to interpretation of what happed. , lighting 大14家大15家 was always changed on a Sunday. Wh
6、en work started again on Monday, output rose compared with the previous Saturday and to 大16家大17家 rise for the next couple of days. , a comparison with data for 大18家 weeks when there was no experimentation showed that output always went up on Monday, workers to be diligent for the first few 大19家 days
7、 of the week in any case, before a plateau and then 大20家 slackening off. This suggests that the alleged “Hawthorne effect“ is hard to pin down.1.A affectedB achievedC extractedD restored2.A atB upC withD off3.A truthB sightC actD proof2010 年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题34.A controversialB perplexingC mischievou
8、sD ambiguous5.A requirementsB explanations C accountsD assessments6.A concludeB matterC indicateD work7.A as far asB for fear thatC in case that D so long as8.A awarenessB expectation C sentimentD illusion9.A suitableB excessiveC enoughD abundant10. A aboutB forC onD by11. A comparedB shownC subject
9、edD conveyed12. A contrary to B consistent withC parallel with D peculiar to13. A evidenceB guidanceC implication D source14. A disputableB enlighteningC reliable D misleading15. A In contrast B For example C In consequenceD As usual16. A dulyB accidentallyC unpredictably D suddenly17. A failedB cea
10、sedC startedD continued20. A breakingB climbingC surpassingD hittingSectionSection IIIIReadingReading ComprehensionComprehensionPartPart A ADirections:Directions:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWERANSWER SHEETSHEET
11、 1 1. (40 points)4大家版词典级 31 年考研英语真题及答案TextText 1 1Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far- reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of their arts coverage. It is difficult to the point
12、of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper
13、reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England between the turn of the 20th century and the eve of Wo
14、rld War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detail and at length about the events they covered. Thei
15、rs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be published in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define journalism as a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are. ”Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten.
