.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文

上传人:aa****6 文档编号:35533455 上传时间:2018-03-17 格式:PDF 页数:15 大小:144.47KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文_第1页
第1页 / 共15页
.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文_第2页
第2页 / 共15页
.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文_第3页
第3页 / 共15页
.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文_第4页
第4页 / 共15页
.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文_第5页
第5页 / 共15页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《.资产减值认定及会计问题研究 外文原文(15页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Goodwill Impairment An Assessment of Disclosure Quality and Compliance Levels by Large Listed Australian Firms Tyrone M. Carlin Nigel Finch Walker, 1938). Some, apparently exasperated with the slipperiness of goodwill as a construct thought it ought to be expunged from the financial statements as so

2、on as it had come into existence. Chambers supported this approach, objecting to goodwills right to a place on the balance sheet by reason of its lack of “severability” and (to his eyes) lack of capacity to contribute to what he termed the “adaptability of the firm” (Chambers, 1966, p.218). Miller w

3、ould also have consigned goodwill to immediate writedown. Such treatment, he argued, was the least worst means of resolving the fate of an illegitimate creature born of a wholly inadequate framework for the aggregation of assets (Miller, 1973). Gynther, on the other hand, thought it absurd to engage

4、 in rituals of mandatory amortisation and writedown of goodwill taking the view that it could (and ought) as confidently assert its membership of the on balance sheet asset club as other less colourful actors. Optimistic about rapid advancements in measurement techniques, he saw no objection to the

5、recognition (via a continuous revaluation regime) even of that much dreaded sub-species, internally generated goodwill (Gynther, 1969). Given the maelstrom evident in the conceptual sphere, it is perhaps unsurprising that considerable turbulence has long been clearly evident in the world of practice

6、. Early editions of Montgomerys Auditing2 finger goodwill as a favoured tool of watered stock fraudsters and their fellow travellers, suggesting widespread licentiousness including the capitalisation of operating losses to goodwill on the spurious theory that these had been incurred for the future e

7、conomic betterment of the enterprise in question. Add a (dirty) pool, write off against reserves, incant extraordinary expense, invert the sum of the years digits, misallocate purchase consideration to identifiable intangibles, about face and channel away from these back to goodwill, trim cash gener

8、ating unit populations, massage growth assumptions, compress discount rates. Round and round the cauldron go (Gibson Wines Day Micallef Lonergan, 2006). Yet in matters pertaining to the regulation of financial reporting, hope evidently springs eternal. Whatever had transpired historically, a clear b

9、reak with the past was made when it became a requirement at law that International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) would in Australia be the required basis for the preparation of financial statements3 for all reporting periods beginning on or after January 1 2005. In many instances the transiti

10、on to IFRS resulted in very little actual change. This was not so in the case of the new rules pertaining to goodwill accounting, which differed radically from their predecessors. Consequently, informed by the turbulent history of goodwill accounting practice and theory, it is the objective of this

11、paper to take the opportunity afforded by the emergence of the first substantial sample of financial statements prepared by large listed Australian companies under IFRS to peer into this brave (and complex) new domain with a view to forming an impression of its qualities. In pursuing this objective,

12、 the remainder of this paper is structured as follows. Section 2 provides a brief review of key developments in the regulation of goodwill accounting and reporting in Australia to date. Section 3 sets out details of the data sample and research methodology employed. Section 4 consists of a discussio

13、n of the results of the study, while section 5 contains some conclusions and suggests some implications of this study for practice and potential further research. 2. OVERVIEW OF GOODWILL REPORTING ARRANGEMENTS IN AUSTRALIA Although goodwill had figured as an element of financial reports in Australia

14、 for an extended period (Standish, 1972), no reporting standard dealing with goodwill existed in the jurisdiction until the issue in March 19844 of Statement of Accounting Standards AAS 18, Accounting for Goodwill, by the Australian Society of Accountants5 jointly with the Institute of Chartered Acc

15、ountants in Australia6. Prior to that time, an almost perfect regulatory vacuum surrounded financial reporting arrangements for goodwill in Australia, there being, in addition to a lack of accounting standards on the matter, no express requirements from other quarters such as stock exchange listing

16、rules or the Companies Act. This set the Australian landscape at odds with the position in other jurisdictions, for example the United States, where pronouncements pertaining to goodwill had existed for several decades for example, chapter 5 of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 43, issued in 1953, or APB 17, issued in 1970. Consequently, prior to the advent of regulation in Australia, a melange of conflicting

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 办公文档 > 其它办公文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号