《我国民事诉讼辩论原则问题研究》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《我国民事诉讼辩论原则问题研究（38页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、河南大学 硕士学位论文 我国民事诉讼辩论原则问题研究 姓名：皇甫东 申请学位级别：硕士 专业：诉讼法 指导教师：许红霞 2011-05 V 摘 要 现代社会发展与变迁中，法律和法律理论也应与时俱进的或者具有超前性，以保障 和推动社会经济文化的发展与进步。民事诉讼辩论原则作为法庭审理活动标准之一，也 是应跟进时代的步伐， 大陆法系辩论主义历经百年的发展与变迁仍然被西方国家所推崇 并运用于法律规则之中，它以当事人提出和主张的资料为基础，在当事人与法院之间进 行合理的分工，并把法院限制在当事人辩论范围之内来裁决，这样很好的保障其社会稳 定与促进发展。因此，大陆法系辩论主义的发展已具有相对完善，是比较
2、合理的辩论制 度，其约束性已在各法治国家民事诉讼中普遍得到遵循。 我国民事诉讼法由于受前苏联民事诉讼以及我国传统的审判方式的影响， 使我国民 事诉讼辩论原则与大陆法系的辩论主义相去甚远。 虽然近年来进行了民事审判方式改革 倾向于对当事人权利保障，且其中一些改革已具有辩论主义某些内容，但目前我国民事 诉讼辩论原则与真正意义上的约束性辩论原则还存在一定的差距， 为了真正实现我国民 事诉讼审判的目的，理应把大陆法系中辩论主义约束性引入为我国民事诉讼辩论原则， 这为我国法学界所推崇。所以研究和探讨大陆法系辩论主义原则，对我国的民事诉讼法 的发展和完善不但有理论和现实意义而且在司法实务也有参考价值和指导
3、意义。因此， 本文通过对我国民事诉讼辩论原则探讨、并与辩论主义进行比较，指出我国现行民事诉 讼法辩论原则的不足之处。同时，对我国民事诉讼辩论原则的改革与完善提出构想。 本文由四个部分组成： 第一部分，通过分析我国民事辩论原则的基本法理，介绍我国民事诉讼辩论原则问 题，如辩论原则的基本含义及其内容，并对我国民事诉讼辩论原则的内涵进行了界定， 由“辩论”词语含义到辩论原则的概念及内容的分析。运用对比的方法对我国民诉法的 辩论原则与大陆法系辩论主义原则进行比较， 并寻找两种理论之间的内在联系并找出其 差别，为下文的论述作一个理论的铺垫。 第二部分，考察我国民事诉讼中辩论原则的立法现状及存在问题，分析
4、我国辩论原 则存在主要缺陷有：第一，民事诉讼辩论原则中的当事人辩论权的形式化。第二，民事 辩论原则在诉讼主体之间缺乏拘束力， 包括辩论原则在当事人之间不能产生拘束作用和 缺乏对法官产生拘束力。 VI 第三部分，探讨民事诉讼辩论主义的当代发展。结合对古典辩论主义三大命题的限 制的发展与完善和法院对当事人收集诉讼资料的协助释明义务， 指出大陆法系民事 诉讼辩论主义的合理之处与优势所在， 并说明我国民事诉讼辩论原则的改革与发展的方 向。 第四部分，确立我国民事诉讼辩论主义。借助对大陆法系辩论主义原则粗陋的分析 与探讨，本文主张转换我国民事诉讼辩论原则为辩论主义。这是实现和维护公民民主权 利的重要保障
5、，有助于我国司法公正、公平、正义与效率的实现。确立我国民事诉讼辩 论主义的诉讼模式存在现实与理论基础，并提出五个方面之构想：第一，限制法官调查 收集证据权。第二，强调法官释明义务。第三，防止法官实施袭击裁判。第四，建立法 官责任追究和事后救济制度。第五，强化法院判决的既判力。 本文希望能以此对法律实践提供有益帮助，为我国民事诉讼法的修改提供参考，建 立我国民事诉讼法辩论主义的约束性辩论原则， 真正实现法律上和实务中保护当事人的 诉讼权利。 关键词：辩论原则，辩论主义，释明权，袭击裁判，既判力 VII ABSTRACT Development and change in modern socie
6、ty, the law and legal theory should be the times or in advance in order to protect and promote social economic and cultural development and progress. Debate on the principles of civil court activities as one of the criteria, but also should follow up with the times, after a century of civil debate o
7、n the doctrine of development and change are still being used in western countries and the rule of law being respected, and made it to the parties claims based on information between the parties with a reasonable division of the Court and the Court limited the scope of debate within the party to dec
8、ide, so good to protect its social stability and promote development. Therefore, the development of civil debate system has a relatively perfect system of debate is more reasonable, the binding of the rule of law in civil proceedings generally are followed. Civil Procedure Law Civil Procedure and th
9、e former Soviet Union due to our traditional way of trial, so that the principles of civil debate and the civil law doctrine is far from the debate. Although in recent years conducted a Civil Trial tend to protection of the rights of the parties, and some reforms have been a debate in which some ele
10、ments of Marxism, but the principles of civil debate and the real debate on the principle of binding there is still a gap, In order to realize the purpose of civil trials, civil law should be debated in the introduction of Marxism-binding principles for Chinas civil debate, which is respected by our
11、 jurisprudence. So research and study the principles of civil debate on the doctrine of the Civil Procedure Law of the development and improvement of theoretical and practical significance not only in judicial practice and is also a valuable reference and guide. Therefore, this debate on the Princip
12、les of Civil Procedure, and compared with the debate on the doctrine that the principles of the current debate on the VIII Civil Procedure Law of the deficiencies. Meanwhile, the debate on the principles of civil procedure reform and improvement of proposed ideas. This article consists of four parts
13、: The first part, through the analysis of the basic legal principles of civil debate, introduced the principle of civil debate on issues such as the debate on the meaning and content of the basic principles, and the meaning of the principle of civil debate has defined the “debate“ the meaning of the
14、 words to debate the concept and principles of content analysis. Using the method of comparing the debate of the principles of civil procedure law and civil law principles of the debate system to compare and find the intrinsic link between the two theories and to find out the difference, as discusse
15、d below paving the way for a theory. The second part, study the principles of civil legislation in the debate on the situation and existing problems, analysis of the debate on the principles of the major defects exist: first, the principle of civil debate in the formal right to debate the party. Sec
16、ond, the principle of civil debate in the absence of binding between the subject of proceedings, including the principle of debate between the parties can not produce binding effects and the lack of binding on a judge. The third part of the contemporary development of civil debate system. Combining the three propositions of classical Marxism limit debate on the development and improvement and the court proceedings on the parties to gather information to help - Interpretation obligations,
