《2022年考博英语-华东政法大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷（含答案带详解）套卷73》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-华东政法大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷（含答案带详解）套卷73（36页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-华东政法大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷（含答案带详解）1. 单选题In her love the sea is _ symbol: to the narrator it clearly represents everything that is destructive in nature, but at other times it seems to stand for everything in nature that is serenely beautiful.问题1选项A.an enduringB.an ambiguousC.a coherentD.a discrete
2、【答案】B【解析】考查形容词辨析。A选项enduring“持久的；能忍受的”；B选项ambiguous“模糊不清的，模棱两可的；不明确的，不明朗的；引起歧义的”；C选项coherent“连贯的，一致的；明了的；清晰的；凝聚性的；互相耦合的；粘在一起的；共格的”；D选项discrete“离散的，不连续的”。句意：在她的爱中，海是一个_象征：对叙述者来说，它清楚地代表了自然界中所有破坏性的东西，但在其他时候，它似乎代表了自然界中所有宁静美丽的东西。本句表达“海是一个不明确的象征”，因此B选项正确。2. 单选题I would like to have a talk with him _ his co
3、nvenience.问题1选项A.inB.atC.forD.with【答案】B【解析】考查固定搭配。at ones convenience“在某人有时间的时候，在某人方便的时候”。句意：我想在他方便的时候和他谈一谈。因此B选项正确。3. 单选题Lets speed up the lesson. If we _ too long on grammar, we _ enough time for oral activities.问题1选项A.spent.would getB.spent.would not getC.had spent.would have gotD.had spentwould
4、not have got【答案】B【解析】考查虚拟语气。句意：让我们加快上课速度。如果我们_太多在语法上，我们_足够的时间进行口语活动。根据句意可知提出对于现在的条件，主句：主语would/should/might/could动词原形；从句：动词过去式。因此B选项正确。4. 单选题The money spent on medical insurance last year was four times _ ten years ago.问题1选项A.much moreB.as much asC.that as much of thatD.as much as that of【答案】B【解析】考查
5、平行结构。平行结构指and, but, as well as, or, or else, both.and, neithernor, eitheror, not onlybut (also), as much as等并列连词连接两个对等的词或者对等的结构：1. 所连接的谓语形式必须一致，2.所连接的词或短语形式必须一致，3.连接的非谓语动词的形式必须一致；整个题干有省略的部分，把句子展开The money spent on social insurance last year was four times _ that spent on social insurance ten years a
6、go.句意：去年花在社会保险上的钱是十年前花在社会保险上的四倍，即可以看出句子中的平行结构the money与省略的that平行，spent on social insurance last year与省略的spent on social insurance ten years ago平行。A选项：much more后边接多音节形容词或者副词，也能接可数名词复数或者不可数名词，more是much或者many的比较级，代入后不符合题干；C，D选项代入后可以看到that重复，破坏平行结构；B选项代入后符合平行结构。因此B选项正确。5. 单选题The party was excellent, and
7、 Id like to thank all the _.问题1选项A.concerning peopleB.people concerningC.people concernedD.concerned people【答案】C【解析】考查定语。concerned是分词形容词，其意为“有关的”（involved）；concerning是由分词转换而成的介词，其意为“关于”（relating to），结合句意：这个聚会太棒了，我要感谢所有_人。可知本句表达“有关的人”，排除A选项和B选项，concerned通常作后置定语，放在修饰的词之后。因此C选项正确。6. 单选题V. (Constitution
8、al Law and Administrative Law)I wish to take as my subject Justice Scalias 1988 Taft Lecture, Originalism: The Lesser Evil. The published version of this lecture has had an enormous influence. It is among the most frequently cited law review articles and together with Justice Scalias introduction to
9、 A Matter of Interpretation helped shape the current debate over the proper method of constitutional interpretation. Indeed, his Taft Lecture can be credited with contributing to one of the most remarkable intellectual comeback stories of legal scholarship.In the 1980s various leading figures in con
10、stitutional law took aim at the contention that the Constitution should be interpreted according to the original intentions of its framers. Originalism, it was widely thought, was thoroughly trounced by three unanswerable objections. First, originalism is impractical because it is impossible to disc
11、over and aggregate the various intentions held by numerous framers. Second, originalism is actually contrary to the original intentions of the founding generation who themselves rejected reliance on original intent. Finally, originalism is to be rejected because it is wrong for the living to be boun
12、d by the dead hand of the past.In his Taft Lecture, Justice Scalia was perhaps the first defender of originalism to shift the theory from its previous focus on the intentions of the framers of the Constitution to the original public meaning of the text at the time of its enactment. This shift from o
13、riginal framers intent to original public meaning obviated much of the practical objection to originalism. That language has an accessible public meaning is what enables interpersonal communication. If words did not have an objective meaning beyond the subjective intention of speakers and writers, w
14、e would never be able to understand each other. Indeed, the objective theory by which private contracts are normally interpreted assumes the availability of such meaning. And the very same evidence that shows the founding generation rejecting reliance on the intentions of the framers also shows thei
15、r reliance on the original public meaning of the text.Shifting from original framers intent to original public meaning did little to answer the “dead hand” objection, however. Why be bound by the past? For that, Justice Scalia and other originalists had to develop a theory of constitutional legitimacy. Most originalists stressed the theory of popular sovereignty. They contended that the Constitution is an authoritative expression of the will of the People, which judges are duty-bound to follow.RANDY E. BARNETT: “Scalias Infidelit
