《2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题66（附答案详解）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题66（附答案详解）（21页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题（附答案详解）1. 单选题Great Britain used to be called empire on which sun never sets. But its naval force was almost（ ） during the attack.问题1选项A.annihilatedB.prohibitedC.diminishedD.empowered【答案】A【解析】【试题解析】考查动词辨析。A选项annihilate“彻底消灭”；B选项prohibit“阻止，禁止”；C选项diminish“减少，缩小”；D选项empower“使自
2、主；授权”。填入一个过去分词构成被动语态，But表示转折关系，由关键信息naval force“海军力量”可知annihilate“彻底消灭”的过去分词annihilated符合题意，句意为：英国曾经被称作日不落帝国。但它的海军力量几乎在进攻期间被彻底消灭。故答案选A。2. 单选题He was determined to sail around the world（ ）his illness and old age.问题1选项A.givenB.althoughC.despiteD.in spite【答案】C【解析】【试题解析】考查连词辨析。A选项given“考虑到”；B选项although“尽
3、管、虽然”；C选项despite“即使、尽管”；D选项in spite要和of组成固定短语“虽然、尽管”，根据句中关键词“his illness and old age”和题干的句意，且已知despite后可跟名词短语或名词性短语，我们可以判断C选项用法正确且符合语境。3. 单选题Clark felt that his （ ）on one of the most dramatic medical experiments of all time was worth the suffering he underwent.问题1选项A.apprehensionB.appreciationC.pres
4、entationD.participation【答案】D【解析】【试题解析】考查名词辨析。A选项apprehension“理解；拘捕；忧虑”；B选项appreciation“评价，鉴赏”；C选项presentation“赠送，授予；提供，显示；外观”；D选项participation“参加，参与”。四个单词形状相似。空格部分是宾语从句中的主语，on引导介词短语修饰主语，根据关键词“be worth是值得的”，可知空格部分单词意思是“参加”，句意为：克拉克认为他能参加一直以来最受人瞩目的医学实验，吃点苦也值得。选项D符合句子意思，为最佳答案。4. 单选题The phrase “a grief a
5、go” （ ）from the conventional norm that we should put a period of time such as “five minutes” before “ago”.问题1选项A.deviatesB.disconnectsC.detachesD.distortes【答案】A【解析】【试题解析】考查动词辨析。A选项deviate“使脱离，偏离”；B选项disconnect“拆开，使分离”；C选项detach“分离，派遣”；D选项distort“扭曲，变形”。根据句子的主语“phrase短语”和介词from，可知空格意思为“偏离”，四个选项中devia
6、te from有“偏离”的意思，最符合空格意思，故正确答案选A。5. 单选题The negotiation between these two countries has yielded no result. A war is（ ）.问题1选项A.eminentB.imminentC.predominantD.dominant【答案】B【解析】【试题解析】名词辨析题。A选项eminent“杰出的”；B选项imminent“即将来临，迫近的”；C选项predominant“主要的、卓越的”；D选项dominant“显性的、占优势的”。题干第一句话的意思“两国间的谈判没产生结果”，后面可知“战争w
7、ar”马上就要到了，空格部分形容词意思为“马上就要爆发的”，句意为：两国间的谈判没产生结果，战争一触即发。故选项B正确。6. 单选题 During the past generation, the American middle-class family that once could count on hard work and fair play to keep itself financially secure had been transformed by economic risk and new realties. Now a pink slip, a bad diagnosis,
8、 or a disappearing spouse can reduce a family from solidly middle class to newly poor in a few months. In just one generation, millions of mothers have gone to work, transforming basic family economics. Scholars, policymakers, and critics of all stripes have debated the social implications of these
9、changes, but few have looked at the side effect: family risk has risen as well. Todays families have budgeted to the limits of their new two-paycheck status. As a result, they have lost the parachute they once had in times of financial setback a back-up earner (usually Mom) who could go into the wor
10、kforce if the primary earner got laid off or fell sick. This “added-worker effect” could support the safety net offered by unemployment insurance or disability insurance to help families weather bad times. But today, a disruption to family fortunes can no longer be made up with extra income from an
11、otherwise-stay-at-home partner. During the same period, families have been asked to absorb much more risk in their retirement income. Steelworkers, airline employees, and now those in the auto industry are joining millions of families who must worry about interest rates, stock market fluctuation, an
12、d the harsh reality that they may outlive their retirement money. For much of the past year, President Bush campaigned to move Social Security to a saving-account model, with retirees trading much or all of their guaranteed payments for payments depending on investment returns. For younger families
13、the picture is not any better. Both the absolute cost of healthcare and the share of it borne by families have risen and newly fashionable health-saving plans are spreading from legislative halls to Wal-Mart workers, with much higher deductibles and a large new dose of investment risk for families f
14、uture healthcare. Even demographics are working against the middle class family, as the odds of having a weak elderly parent and all the attendant need for physical and financial assistance have jumped eightfold in just one generation. From the middle-class family perspective, much of this, understa
15、ndably, looks far less like an opportunity to exercise more financial responsibility, and a good deal more like a frightening acceleration of the wholesale shift of financial risk onto their already overburdened shoulders. The financial fallout has begun, and the political fallout may not be far behind.1. Todays double-income families are at greater financial risk in that （ ）.2. As a result of President Bushs reform, retired people may have （ ）.3. According to the author, health-savings plans will （ ）.4. It can be inferred from the las
