杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析

上传人:月亮****转 文档编号:364485473 上传时间:2023-10-16 格式:DOC 页数:11 大小:70.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《杭州市下城区2023年考研《英语一》临考冲刺试题含解析(11页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、杭州市下城区2023年考研英语一临考冲刺试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)Trying new things is the only way we can discover hidden talents. I 1 my career as an editor for a magazine. I didnt

2、 really mind the work, but I wanted something more 2 . Then I was offered a management 3 of a digital reading company. The job was a seemingly 4 mix of my skills and interests, so I jumped at it. 5 , soon after I joined the company, its model changed to focus on K-12 education, and everything about

3、my position changed. I was asked to take on the 6 different roles of selling content to teachers and training people. I felt more than a little 7 my comfort zone.I knew I wanted to grow as a(an) 8 and make a serious effect on the company. I told myself that everything feels 9 at first and I should a

4、t least try. 10 , I felt like I didnt have a(an) 11 . I knew jumping out of the 12 was the right thing for me, even though it felt pretty awful.I was fortunate to be 13 by very helpful people, both at work and at home. They kept 14 me. I spent hours researching my companys 15 . I asked lots of quest

5、ions and spoke to many people in need. I looked for opportunities to put in extra 16 . The more I did, the better I felt.Over time, I discovered that the job was 17 I could do and liked doing. It was an amazing 18 to see the company grow and know that my efforts contributed to 19 success and that it

6、s important to take risks and accept new 20 . Actually, theres nothing worse than failing because you refuse to even try.1、Astarted out Bmoved up Cdeveloped Dspent2、Asteady Bcomfortable Cpaying Dchallenging3、Aguidance Bsuggestion Cposition Dcourse4、Aloose Bperfect Cmild Dcomplex5、AHowever BInstead C

7、Additionally DThus6、Aslightly Bcompletely Crelatively Dstrangely7、Ainside Baround Cwithin Doutside8、Aindividual Bconsumer Cleader Dadult9、Asilly Btough Cfresh Deasy10、AOn the contrary BIn brief CIn a way DOn one hand11、Achoice Bidea Cdream Dreason12、Acontrol Btouch Cnest Dcompany13、Ainformed Bsurrou

8、nded Cfollowed Dimpressed14、Aconvincing Breminding Caccessing Dencouraging15、Astaff Bincome Cproducts Dconditions16、Aeffort Bmoney Coffer Dcare17、Aanything Beverything Csomething Dnothing18、Aprofit Breward Cplatform Dbehavior19、Amy Btheir Cyour Dits20、Aopportunities Brequests Ccultures DservicesSect

9、ion II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1 It is generally acknowledged that young people from poorer socio-economic backgrounds tend to do fess we

10、ll in the education system. In an attempt to help the children of poor families, a nationwide program called “Headstart” was started in the US in 1965. A lot of money was poured into it. It Look children into pre-school institutions at the age of three and was supposed to help them succeed in school

11、. But the results have been disappointing because the program began too late. Many children who entered it at three were already behind their peers in language and intelligence and the parents were not involved in the process. At the end of each day, “Headstart” children returned to the same disadva

12、ntaged home environment.To improve the results, another program was started in Missouri that concentrated on parents as the childs first teachers. This program was based on research showing that working with the family is the most effective way of helping children get the best possible start in life

13、. The four-year study included 380 families who were about to have their first child and represented different socio-economic status, age and family structure. The program involved trained educators visiting and working with the parent or parents and the child. The program also gave the parents some

14、 guidance, and useful skills on child development.At three, the children involved in the “Missouri” program were evaluated with the children selected from the same socio-economic backgrounds and family situations. The results were obvious. The children in the program were more advanced in language d

15、evelopment, problem solving and other intellectual skills than their peers. They performed equally well regardless of socio-economic backgrounds or family structure. The one factor that was found to affect the childs development was the poor quality of parent-child interaction. That interaction was not necessarily bad in poorer families.T

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 资格认证/考试 > 其它考试类文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号