2023考研英语一全真试题及答案详解（复习必做2020）

絶密启用前2020年全囯硬士研究生招生考试英语（一）（科目代碼：201)考生注意事璜1.答題前，考生須在试題冊指定位置上填写考生編弓和考生姓名；在答題卡指定位置上填写扳考单位、考生姓名和考生編丹，并涂写考生編另信息京。2.考生須把试題冊上的试卷糸形碼粘貼茶取下，粘貼在答題卡的试卷篆形碼粘貼位置框中。不按規定粘貼糸形碼而影啊讠平卷結果的，責任由考生自負。3.造抒題的答案必須涂写在答題卡相庶題弓的造璜上，非造抒題的答案必須节写在答題卡指定位置的辺框民域內。超出答題尻域节写的答案元效；在草稿纸、试題冊上答題元效。4.填（节）写部分必須使用黑色字迹签字黽节写，字迹工整、竜迹清楚；涂写部分必須使用2B铂僊填涂。5.考试結束，将答題卡和试題冊按規定交回。（以下信息考生必須从真填写）二二I11111111111111 I Section I Use of English Directions:Read the following text.Choose the best word(s)for each numbered blank and mark A,B,C or D on the ANSWER SHEET.(10 points)Even if families dont sit down to eat together as frequently as before,millions of Britons will nonetheless have got a share this weekend of one of that nations great traditions:the Sunday roast.1 a cold winters day,few culinary pleasures can 仁it.Yet as we report now,the food police are determined that this 3 should be rendered yet another quality pleasure 4 to damage our health.The Food Standards Authority(FSA)has 5 a public warning about the risks of a compound called acrylamide that forms in some foods cooked 6 high temperatures.This means that people should 7 crisping their roast potatoes,reject thin-crust pizzas and only 8 toast their bread.But where 1s the evidence to support such alarmist advice?9 studies have shown that acrylamide can cause neurological damage in mice,there is no 10 evidence that it causes cancer in humans.Scientists say the compound is 11 to cause cancer but have no hard scientific proof 12 the precautionary principle,it could be argued that it is 13 to follow the FSA advice.14,it was rumoured that smoking caused cancer for years before the evidence was found to prove a 15.Doubtless a piece of boiled beef can always be 16 up on Sunday alongside some steamed vegetables,without the Yorkshire pudding and no wine.But would life be worth living?17,the FSA says it is not telling people to cut out roast foods 18,but to reduce their lifetime intake.However,their 19 risks coming a cross as being pushy and overprotective.Constant health scares just 20 with one listening.1.2.1.A In B Towards C On DTill 2.A match B express C satisfy D influence 3.A patience B enjoyment C surprise D concern 4.A intensified B privileged C compelled D guaranteed 5.A issued B received C compelled D guaranteed 6.A under B at C for D by 7.A forget B regret C finish D avoid 8.A partially B regular C easily D initially 9.A Unless B Since C If D While 10.A secondary B external C conclusive D negative 11.A insufficient B bound C likely D slow 12.A On the basis of B At the cost of C In addition to D In contrast to 13.A interesting B advisable C urgent D fortunate 14.A As usual B In particular C By definition D After all 15.A resemblance B combination C connection D pattern 16.A made B served C saved D used 17.A To be fair B For instance C To be brief D In general 18.A reluctantly B entirely C gradually D carefully 19.A promise B experience Ccampaign D competition 20.A follow up B pick up Copen up D end up Section II Reading Comprehension Part A Directions:Read the following four texts.Answer the questions after each text by choosing A,B,C or D.Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET.(40 points)Text 1 A group of Labour MPs,among them Yvette Cooper,are bringing in the new year with a call to institute a UK town of culture award.The proposal is that it should sit alongside the existing city of culture title,which was held by Hull in 2017,and has been awarded to Coventry for 2021.Cooper and her colleagues argue that the success of the crown for Hull,where it brought in位20m of investment and an avalanche of arts,ought not to be confined to cities.Britains towns,it is true,are not prevented from applying,but they generally lack the resources to put together a bid to beat their bigger competitors.A town of culture award could,it is argued,become an annual event,attracting funding and creating jobs.Some might see the proposal as a booby prize for the fact that Britain 1s no longer able to apply for the much more prestigious title of European capital of culture,a sought-after award bagged by Glasgow in 1990 and Liverpool in 2008.A cynic might speculate that the UK is on the verge of disappearing into an endless fever of self-celebration in its desperation to reinvent itself for the post-Brexit world:after town of culture,who knows what will follow-village of culture?Suburb of culture?Hamlet of culture?It is also wise to recall that such titles are not a cure-all.A badly run year of culture washes in and washes out of a place like the tide,bringing prominence for a spell but leaving no lasting benefits to the community.The really successful holders of such titles are those that do a great deal more than fill hotel bedrooms and bring in high-profile arts events and good press for a year.They transform the aspirations of the people who live there;they nudge the self-image of the city into a bolder and more optimistic light.It is hard to get right,and requires a remarkable degree of vision,as well as cooperation between city aut