《减刑案件审理程序实证调研报告》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《减刑案件审理程序实证调研报告（23页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、法律硕士学位论文评阅参考标准2法律硕士理论性研究论文评阅参考标准法律硕士调研报告、案例分析报告、应用性专题研究论文评阅参考标准一、论文的选题意义一、论题是否具有现实意义与司法实践价值二、对文献资料掌握的程度二、所选案例及调研数据是否紧扣论题三、论文所反映出的基础理论和专门知识水平三、论述及论证方法是否反映了对基础理论和专门知识的掌握与运用四、论文的创造性四、是否针对特定的问题做出了独立思考，或提出了切实可行的解决方案、方法五、写作的规范性和逻辑性等方面五、不拘泥于理论性研究论文格式，具有与论文类型相适应的写作规范与逻辑六、论文的不足六、论文的不足论文所反映出的基础理论和专门知识水平优（ ）良（
2、 ）中（ ）差（ ）论文所反映的分析问题、解决问题的能力优（ ）良（ ）中（ ）差（ ）论文写作水平优（ ）良（ ）中（ ）差（ ）论文写作水平优（ ）良（ ）中（ ）差（ ）该论文是否达到硕士学位论文水平该论文是否达到硕士学位论文水平是否同意该硕士生参加论文答辩是否同意该硕士生参加论文答辩法律硕士专业学位论文减刑案件审理程序实证调研报告作者姓名：余晨指导教师：卢君西南政法大学Southwest University of Political Science and Law摘要本文笔者在减刑案件审理的工作实践中发现，司法实务部门对审判程序改革问题的研究侧重于一审、二审以及死刑复核程序，而忽视了
3、对减刑、假释审理程序的思考。我国现行法律及相关司法解释对减刑、假释程序的规定过于简单、笼统，缺乏科学性、具体性和可操作性，司法实践中人民法院对减刑、假释案件大多采取书面审理的方式，其作出裁决的依据完全依赖于刑罚执行机关报送的相关材料，检察机关的法律监督流于形式，罪犯和被害人无权参与其中，被排斥在程序之外，整个审理程序带有极强的“行政审核”色彩，与正当法律程序的要求相去甚远。减刑作为刑罚执行制度中变更执行的重要内容，直接关系到刑罚执行的效果和目标，对减刑审理程序的实证调查和研究具有重要的意义。因此，笔者立足于自身工作实践现状，实证检讨了当前减刑案件审理过程中存在的主要问题，以期从现实根源、立法实
4、践与理论困惑三方面分析其原因，并提出具体化、规范化的操作程序构建。本文从实证调查的角度出发，通过对减刑案件审理实践当中相关数据和信息的收集、分析，找出减刑案件审理程序存在的一些问题，分析产生这些问题的原因，进而对减刑案件审理程序的构建提出自己的观点。本文首先对减刑案件审理程序的法律依据进行了解读，通过对现行法律条文和司法解释的梳理，概括了整个减刑案件从立案审查到减刑裁定的具体程序。然后结合工作实践以及调查数据的分析，实证检讨了减刑案件审理程序存在的问题。这些问题包括审理构造缺失、审理程式行政化、开庭程序过场化、利益相关人参与性不足、服刑人员地位被动化、被害人地位边缘化以及减刑监督乏力。接下来从
5、现实根源、程序缺位和理论困惑三个方面对减刑案件审理程序的症结进行了原因分析。笔者认为产生这些问题的原因包括监狱工作的严重封闭性、审理构造与参与度的不合理性以及减刑审理程序没有明确是类似行政审批的程序还是诉讼审理的程序。最后提出了对减刑案件审理的程序设想。在对程序的构建设想中，笔者提出了专门审理机构的设置即在基层或中级人民法院内部设立减刑委员会；明确了开庭审理的范围；设置了包括审前公示、报送相关材料、检察机关调查核实、立案审查在内的审前程序；构建了以法庭调查程序、法庭辩论、最后陈述、评议和宣判为组成的开庭审理程序；完善1了监督程序并加入了救济程序。关键词：减刑；审理现状；实证检讨；程序建构2Ab
6、stractIn this paper, the author found that in the in commutation case work practice, substantivedepartments of Justice study focused on the reform of the trial proceedings in the first trial,the second trial and the death penalty review procedures, to the neglect of the commutation,parole proceeding
7、s of thinking. Our current legal and judicial interpretation of thecommutation and parole program provisions are too brief and general lack of scientific,specific and operability, the Peoples Court in the judicial practice of reduction of sentence,parole cases are mostly written hearing, the ruling
8、basis for completely dependent on thepenalty enforcement authority and submit related materials, procuratorial organs of legalsupervision mere formality, the offender and the victim has no right to participate, beenexcluded from the program, the entire proceedings with a strong administrative audit
9、color,and a far cry from the requirements of due process of law. Commutation as important tochange the penalty system, is directly related to the effect of the execution of punishment andtarget, has important implications on the the commutation proceedings empirical surveys andstudies. Therefore, th
10、e authors based on their own work practice status quo empirical reviewof the current commutation case proceedings, the presence of the main problems, to realisticroot, legislative practice and theoretical confusion three aspects of analysis of the reasons andput forward specific technology, standard
11、ization of operating procedures to build .This article is from the perspective of empirical investigation the commutation cases fortrial practice relevant data and information collection, analysis, identify commutationproceedings in cases exist some problems, analyze the reasons for these problems,
12、and thusreduction of sentence cases Construction of trial procedures put forward their views. Firstly,the interpretation of the legal basis of commutation proceedings in cases combing through theprovisions of the existing laws and judicial interpretations, summarizes the commutationcases from filing
13、 to review specific procedures to the commutation ruling. Then combinedwith work practices as well as the analysis of the survey data, and empirical review thecommutation proceedings in cases exist. These issues include the lack of trial structure, trialprogram Administrationization, hearing procedures transitions, lack of stakeholderengagement, inmates status Passive, marginalization and commutation weak supervision ofthe status of victims. Next, from the real root of the program the absence and theory confused1
