《neuroscience remembrance of things past》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《neuroscience remembrance of things past（3页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、NEUROSCIENCE: Remembrance of Things Past Daniel L. Schacter and Anthony D. Wagner* In a typical day, people experience myriad events and see innumerable objects, yet only some of these experiences are converted into enduring memories (1). Progress in understanding the neural pathways that encode the
2、se memories has been rather modest thus far. Typical studies of brain-injured amnesic patients (2) cannot cleanly distinguish between the effects of brain damage on the encoding of memories and their retrieval from storage (3). Although neuroimaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography (
3、PET) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), detect activity in specific brain regions as people carry out various kinds of memory tests (4), their time resolution is not fine enough to determine the precise sequence in which different brain regions influence the encoding and formation of
4、memories. Now, Fernandez et al. (5) track the serial encoding of memories within the medial temporal lobe (MTL) of the brain (a region beneath the temporal lobe surface that includes the parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus) using a real-time electrophysiological technique (see the figure). They re
5、port on page 1582 an attempt to answer the fundamental question: Where and when are memories formed in the brain? Memories are made of this. Lateral view of the brain highlighting three regions of the medial temporal lobe (MTL) that are involved in memory formation: the anterior parahippocampal gyru
6、s (purple) and hippocampus (green) in the anterior MTL, and the posterior parahippocampal gyrus (red) in the posterior MTL. CREDIT: K. SUTLIFF Previous studies (6) have used event-related fMRI (7) or electrophysiological techniques (8) to look at areas of brain activity during encoding of specific e
7、xperiences that were subsequently forgotten or remembered. Study participants (6)-scanned by fMRI as they viewed a series of words and then tried to recognize them from a new list-showed increased brain activity during information encoding in the posterior region of the left MTL (also called the lef
8、t parahippocampal gyrus) and in the left frontal lobe for words that were subsequently remembered compared to words that were subsequently forgotten. Comparable results were reported in subjects scanned as they studied pictures of everyday scenes, and later tried to remember them. But here, the incr
9、eased fMRI signal during encoding for recalled pictures was located in both the left and right posterior MTL and in the right frontal lobe. The Fernandez study now shows that two parts of the left MTL-the anterior MTL in the rhinal cortex and the hippocampus proper-contribute to the memory encoding
10、of words and their subsequent recall. The investigators conclude that the timing of the contributions of the two regions is staggered such that encoding activity in the hippocampus follows encoding activity in the anterior MTL. Fernandez et al. recorded electrical activity with long electrodes inser
11、ted into the MTL of 12 epilepsy patients in whom the MTL was unaffected. The event-related potentials (ERPs) measured by these depth electrodes provide fine-grained spatial resolution of brain activity (also available with fMRI) and real-time temporal resolution (which is not possible with fMRI). Du
12、ring electrical recording the patients were asked to memorize 12 words that were presented on a computer monitor. After a brief period of distraction, patients attempted to recall the words they had just read. In the anterior MTL, ERPs recorded for list words that were remembered versus those that w
13、ere forgotten began to differ approximately 310 ms after stimulus presentation (that is, the negative potential was greater for remembered than for forgotten words). In the hippocampus, by contrast, ERPs for remembered and forgotten words did not begin to differ until approximately 500 ms after stim
14、ulus onset (in this case, there was a greater positive potential for recalled than for nonrecalled words). These results are broadly consistent with the earlier fMRI studies (6) in that both the fMRI and ERP data directly implicate MTL structures in memory encoding associated with both subsequent re
15、membering and forgetting. The two avenues of research appear to differ, however, in that the fMRI studies demonstrate that activity in the posterior MTL (posterior parahippocampal gyrus) is associated with subsequent retention of memory, whereas the ERP results indicate that activity in the anterior
16、 MTL (anterior parahippocampal gyrus and hippocampus) is associated with memory retention. Fernandez et al. did not record from the posterior MTL and it may be that if ERPs had been recorded from this region then an association between activity during encoding and memory formation would have been found. The fMRI and ERP data suggest that there may be at least three distinct regions of the MTL involved in memory encoding. Why did the earlier fMRI studies fail to find an association between ac
