《SPSIssuesinGlobalization》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《SPSIssuesinGlobalization（29页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、SPS Issues in Globalization,Gretchen H. Stanton Senior Counsellor Agriculture and Commodities Division WTO,What is an SPS measure? SPS Agreement - Annex A,to protect:,human or animal life,risks arising from additives, contaminants, toxins or disease-causing organisms in their food, beverages, feedst
2、uffs;,from:,human life,plant- or animal-carried diseases (zoonoses);,animal or plant life,pests, diseases, or disease-causing organisms;,a country,damage caused by the entry, establishment or spread of pests,Governments have the right to restrict international trade when it is necessary to protect h
3、uman, animal or plant health however ,however, if this results in a trade dispute:,they must be able to show that there is a risk to health, based on scientific evidence, or take a provisional, “precautionary” measure they must be “consistent” in the level of health protection sought (G/SPS/15) they
4、 must use the least trade-restrictive means to achieve the level of health protection; and they must be transparent about the measures taken,Basic Provisions,1. Scientific justification - or provisional 2. Harmonization 3. Consistency 4. Equivalence 5. Disease-free areas 6. Transparency 7. Technical
5、 assistance/special treatment,Scientific justification - issues,How judge if “based on scientific principles?” What is “sufficient scientific evidence”? Whose science? Whose risk assessment? What is required in a risk assessment?,Scientific justification - interpretations,EC hormones dispute (WT/DS2
6、6 and 48)theoretical uncertainty (the uncertainty remaining because science can never provide absolute certainty that a given substance will not ever have adverse health effects) is not the kind of risk to be considered,Scientific justification - interpretations,Australia salmon dispute (WT/DS18),Th
7、ree-pronged test (three cumulative requirements)1. identify the disease(s) 2. evaluate the likelihood of entry, establishment or spread 3. according to the SPS measure which might be applied,Scientific justification - interpretations,Japan Variety Testing (WT/DS76)rational relationship required betw
8、een measure and scientific evidence must be determined on a case-by-case basis,Provisional measures - issues,Precaution or protectionism? When is scientific evidence “sufficient”? What is a reasonable period of time for review? How does this compare with the Precautionary Principle?,Precaution - int
9、erpretations,Japan Variety Testing (WT/DS76) Measure taken when insufficient relevant scientific information Adopted on the basis of available information Member must actively seek to obtain the necessary additional information Member must revise the measure within a reasonable period of time,Harmon
10、ization - issues,Participation of developing countries in standard-setting Are the international standards appropriate? Going beyond international standards What about national treatment?,Codex = joint FAO/WHO Codex Alimentarius Commission OIE = Office international des epizooties IPPC = Internation
11、al Plant Protection Convention (FAO),Harmonization,Harmonization - interpretations,EC Hormones (WT/DS26 and 48) “base on” does not mean identical to international standards countries have a right to impose more stringent requirements, but must demonstrate that based on a risk assessment,Harmonizatio
12、n - interpretations,Committee monitors the use of international standards - adopted procedure - G/SPS/11,Consistency - issues,Acceptable level of protection (ALOP) same as acceptable level of risk sovereign right to establish - but no country defines ALOP with precision difficult to apply ALOP consi
13、stently - and difficult to maintain consistently,Consistency - interpretation,EC Hormones and Australian salmon: Three-pronged test: 1. different appropriate levels of protection in different situations; 2. differences are “arbitrary or unjustifiable” 3. the differences result in “discrimination or
14、a disguised restriction on international trade”,a Member should publicly express its ALOP a Member should compare levels of protection achieved by different measures it applies, to avoid arbitrary or unjustifiable distinctions each authority with responsibility for applying ALOP should be clearly aw
15、are of national policy on ALOP each competent authority should be aware of what other competent authorities are doing,Consistency - interpretation Committee guidelines (G/SPS/15),Consistency - guidelines continuedcommon approaches or consistent procedures should be used in evaluating the measures wh
16、ich might be applied to achieve ALOP if ALOP changes, existing measures need to be reviewed for consistency existing measures should be kept under review and revised where necessary to bring into line with current ALOP,Equivalence - issues,Scope of equivalence - systems, products, processes or measures? What is the importing countrys ALOP? Has the importing country done a risk assessment? What does “objectively demonstrate” mean - what is the standard of proof?,Equivalence - interpretation Committee guidelines (G/SPS/19),
