《2015硅谷指数报告》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2015硅谷指数报告（86页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、PEOPLEECONOMYSOCIETYPLACEGOVERNANCE2015 SILICON VALLEY INDEX25PROFILE OF SILICON VALLEY . 6THE REGIONS SHARE OF CALIFORNIAS ECONOMIC DRIVERS . 7 2015 INDEX HIGHLIGHTS . 8PEOPLETalent Flows and Diversity.10ECONOMYEmployment .16Income . 22Innovation whereas Net Foreign Immigration and Domestic Migrati
2、on, Adult Educational Attainment, Age Distribution, Ethnic Composition, and Foreign Born figures are based on Santa Clara and San Mateo County data only.PROFILE OF SILICON VALLEY79.6% GDP* 37.4% Venture Capital 46.9% Patent Registrations20.1% Cleantech Venture Capital39.7% IPOs9.3% Jobs26.2% M Popul
3、ation (California Department of Finance, 2014); GDP (Moodys E, 2014); Venture Capital (PricewaterhouseCoopers/National Venture Capital Association MoneyTreeTM Report, Data: Thomson Reuters, Q1-3 2014); Cleantech Venture Capital (Cleantech Groups i3 Platform, Q1-3 3013); Patent Registrations (U.S. Pa
4、tent and Trademark Office, 2013); Initial Public Offerings (Renaissance Capital, 2014); Jobs (State of California Employment Development Department Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, and EMSI, Q2 2014); Angel Investment (CB Insights, Q1-3 2014); Mergers the 2011-2013 and 2014 data cannot be u
5、sed for comparison purposes with each other, or with data from previous years. | Data Sources: California Department of Education, Physical Fitness Testing Research Files; kidsdata.org | Analysis: Silicon Valley Institute for Regional Studiesadministered prior to ACA implementation that enrolled ove
6、r 30,000 Silicon Valley residents in Medi-Cal by the end of 2013.1The California Department of Education physical fitness testing meth- odology was changed twice during the period of analysis - once in the 2010-2011 school year and again in the 2012-2013 school year. As such, the 2013-2014 school ye
7、ar data cannot be compared to the previous datasets; however, downward trends in Silicon Valley and the state are evident in both of those datasets, indicating that obesity rates are declin- ing. According to physical fitness tests administered during the 2013-14 school year, 32% of Silicon Valley s
8、tudents (5th, 7th and 9th graders com- bined) are overweight or obese, compared to 38% throughout the state.1. California Department of Health Care Services, LIHP Enrollment Data, Quarter 2 of Fiscal Year 2013-2014.SOCIETYPreparing for Economic SuccessEarly EducationArts and CultureQuality of Health
9、Safety52SOCIETY SAFETYViolent crime rates continue to decline in Silicon Valley and the state, while the number of adult felony ?!?“#$%? reached a decade high.WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT? Public safety is an important indicator of societal health. The occurrence of crime erodes our sense of community by c
10、reating fear and instabil- ity, and poses an economic burden as well. The number of Silicon Valley public safety officers provides a unique window into the changing infra- structure of our city and county governments, and affects the publics perception of safety.HOW ARE WE DOING? Violent crime in Si
11、licon Valley and throughout the state declined in 2013, reaching rates of 399 and 245 per 100,000 people, following the slight increases that occurred in 2012. Aggravated assault by far represents the majority of violent crimes reported in Silicon Valley in 2013, at 59%, fol- lowed by robbery (32%),
12、 forcible rape (8%) and homicide (1%). The proportion of homicides and aggravated assaults in Silicon Valley is com- parable to that in California as a whole. The percentage of forcible rape in Silicon Valley is slightly higher than the statewide proportion (5%), while the regional percentage of rob
13、beries (32%) is lower than that in California as a whole (35%). These breakdowns for both Silicon Valley and California remained the same between 2012 and 2013.The rate of felony offenses differs greatly between juvenile offenses and adult offenses. Since 2011 there has been an increase in adult fel
14、ony offenses in both the region and the state, reaching 900 per 100,000 adults and juveniles and 1,413 per 100,000 adults and juveniles, respectively. This two year upward trend follows a period of several years when both the adult and juvenile offense rates were declining. The juvenile rates, however, continued to decline s
