美国的高速铁路

上传人:ji****n 文档编号:47489785 上传时间:2018-07-02 格式:PDF 页数:35 大小:649.42KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
美国的高速铁路_第1页
第1页 / 共35页
美国的高速铁路_第2页
第2页 / 共35页
美国的高速铁路_第3页
第3页 / 共35页
美国的高速铁路_第4页
第4页 / 共35页
美国的高速铁路_第5页
第5页 / 共35页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《美国的高速铁路》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《美国的高速铁路(35页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress High Speed Rail (HSR) in the United States David Randall Peterman, Coordinator Analyst in Transportation Policy John Frittelli Specialist in Transportation Policy William J. Mallett Specialist in Transportation Policy December 8

2、, 2009 Congressional Research Service7-5700 www.crs.gov R40973 High Speed Rail (HSR) in the United States Congressional Research Service Summary Congress has been interested in high speed rail (HSR) since the 1960s, but the provision of $8 billion for intercity passenger rail and high speed rail pro

3、jects in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA; P.L. 111-5), enacted in February 2009, has catalyzed enthusiasm for high speed rail in Congress and the nation. One consequence has been a proposed authorization of $50 billion for intercity passenger rail development (including high speed r

4、ail) as part of new surface transportation authorization legislation. There have been other periods of interest in HSR on the part of Congress and various states over the past few decades; they largely faded in the face of obstacles such as the high cost of HSR and policies supporting other modes of

5、 transportation. Comparing the costs and benefits of investing in one mode versus another is typically not a part of transportation funding decisions. There are two approaches to HSR: improving existing tracks and signaling to allow trains to travel somewhat faster, typically to as much as 110 miles

6、 per hour (mph), generally on track shared with freight trains; and building new tracks dedicated exclusively to high speed passenger rail service, to allow trains to travel at speeds of 200 mph or more. The potential costs, and benefits, are relatively lower with the first approach and higher with

7、the second approach. Current discussions of high speed rail programs and policies sometimes fail to clearly distinguish between these two approaches. There are a handful of routes in the United States where track has been improved to allow service at up to 110 mph, and there are a few places along A

8、mtraks Northeast Corridor where speeds of up to 150 mph are achieved for a relatively short distance. But there are no dedicated high speed lines in the United States comparable to those in Europe and Asia, on which trains travel at sustained speeds of over 150 mph. Estimates of the cost of construc

9、ting HSR vary according to the speed sought, the geography of the corridor, the cost of right-of-way, and other factors. Construction costs likely increase with population density, but this high fixed-cost technology depends on density for higher usage rates. Experts say that virtually no HSR lines

10、anywhere in the world have earned enough revenue to cover both their construction and operating costs, even where population density is far greater than anywhere in the United States. Typically, governments have paid the construction costs, and in many cases have subsidized the operating costs as we

11、ll. Proponents of HSR contend that it offers benefits to society at large, not just to its passengers: that it can be a more energy efficient and less polluting transportation alternative compared to aviation and highway travel (and is safer than driving). They also cite its potential to relieve con

12、gestion on highways and in the aviation system; its potential contribution to economic development; and the potential job-creating impact of constructing high speed lines. Others question whether these potential social benefits are commensurate with the likely costs, and whether a national HSR netwo

13、rk is a practical transportation option for the United States, given the nations large size and relatively low population density. In light of the lack of experience with high speed rail development in the United States, HSR projects are likely to face many challenges, including securing adequate fu

14、nding over the long term and complexity of implementation. Given the variety of arguments both for and against high speed rail, and the costs of high speed rail in light of the constrained federal budget, Congress may wish to carefully consider further investment in high speed rail. High Speed Rail (HSR) in the United States Congressional Research Service Contents Introduction.1 What is High Speed Rail? .1 High Speed Rail Options.3 Components of a High Speed Rail System.3 Conventional High Speed Rail .4 Track.

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 社会民生

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号