《论非法证据排除规则对职务犯罪侦查影响及应对》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《论非法证据排除规则对职务犯罪侦查影响及应对（26页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 Callenge of the Exclusionary Rule to the Investigation of the Crime by Taking Advantage of Duty and its Response Candidate Liu Yun Supervisor Liu Meixiang College Law School Program Juris Master Specialization Criminal Procedure Law Degree Master University Xiangtan Universty Date November 5th of 2
2、011 湘潭大学湘潭大学 学位论文原创性声明学位论文原创性声明 本人郑重声明： 所呈交的论文是本人在导师的指导下独立进行研究所取得的研究成果。 除了文中特别加以标注引用的内容外， 本论文不包含任何其他个人或集体已经发表或撰写的成果作品。 对本文的研究做出重要贡献的个人和集体， 均已在文中以明确方式标明。 本人完全意识到本声明的法律后果由本人承担。 作者签名： 日期： 年 月 日 学位论文版权使用授权书学位论文版权使用授权书 本学位论文作者完全了解学校有关保留、使用学位论文的规定，同意学校保留并向国家有关部门或机构送交论文的复印件和电子版， 允许论文被查阅和借阅。 本人授权湘潭大学可以将本学位论
3、文的全部或部分内容编入有关数据库进行检索，可以采用影印、缩印或扫描等复制手段保存和汇编本学位论文。 涉密论文按学校规定处理。 作者签名： 日期： 年 月 日 导师签名： 日期： 年 月 日 I 摘 要 非法证据排除规则始创于美国，是对警察因侵权侦查而取得的证据予以排除从而达到制裁目的的权利救济手段，是保障人权与打击犯罪的平衡点之一。我国司法制度上存在重实体、轻程序的倾向，在法律制度上，尤其是包括证据制度在内的程序性法律上的立法欠缺给实践中带来不少隐患。在此背景下，2010年6月我国最高人民法院、最高人民检察院、公安部、国家安全部及司法部联合发布了关于办理刑事案件排除非法证据若干问题的规定（以下
4、简称非法证据排除规定）以及关于办理死刑案件审查判断证据若干问题的规定 （以下简称 死刑案件证据规定 ） 。本文以我国非法证据排除规则的基本内容为出发点，分析该规则确立后对我国检察机关职务犯罪侦查带来的具体影响，并寻找原因、提出建议。 本文除引言和结语外分为三部分。第一部分主要介绍我国非法证据排除规则的基本内容及特点；第二部分从检察机关职务犯罪侦查特点、方式及风险入手，分析规则确立后给职务犯罪侦查带来的各种具体影响；第三部分笔者从加强审讯策略培训、提升技术侦查水平、提高侦查人员程序意识、心理素质以及立法建议等具体方面提出应对非法证据排除的对策。 关关键词：非法证据；非法证据排除规则；键词：非法证
5、据；非法证据排除规则；职务犯罪职务犯罪；侦查侦查 II Abstract The exclusionary rule is a legal principle originated from the United States, which has been considered as a right remedial measure to against the act of tort done by Police as well as one of balance points to protect human right and fight against crime. Our Chin
6、a traditional judicial system has a tendency that bias towards the body and against the procedure. In legal system, especially the legislation of procedural law including the evidence system has always been criticized and which also brings a lot of troubles in practice. Under this background, Stipul
7、ation of Several Issues on Exclusionary Rule Applyin in Criminal Case handling( hereinafter referred to as“ Stipulation of Exclusionary Rule “ ) and “ Stipulation of Several Issues on Evidence Judging in Death Penalty Case Examining ( hereinafter referred to as the“ Stipulation of Evidence in Death
8、Penalty Case “ ) have been jointly issued by the Supreme Peoples Court, the Supreme Peoples Procuratorate, the Ministry of Public Security, the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of Justice in June of 2010.This essay would like use the basic content of exclusionary rule applied in China as
9、the starting point to analyze the concrete influence on China procuratorial organs for the investigation of the crime by taking advantage of duty after the application of exclusionary rule, and moreover to find the reason and provide its suggestion. Besides the foreword and epilogue, this essay cons
10、ists of three parts. The first part introduces mainly the basic content and features of exclusionary rule applied in China. The second part, based on the features, measures and risk of the procuratorial organs in the investigation of the crime by taking adva+ntage of duty, analysis the various concr
11、ete effects of exclusionary rule on the investigation of the crime by taking advantage of duty after its application. And in the third part, the author would like provide the countermeasures to the applied exclusionary rule in several concrete aspects such as strengthening the interrogation tactics
12、training, improving the level of technical investigation and improving the procedural consciousness, technical quality, psychological quality of the investigator as well as the lawmaking suggestions. Key words: illegal evidence; exclusionary rule; crime by taking advantage of duty; investigation 目 录 引 言 .1 第 1 章 我国非法证据排除规则主要内容及特点 .2 1.1 我国非法证据排除规则的主要内容 2 1.1.1 实体规则 . 3 1.1.2 程序规则 . 4 1.2 我国非法证据排除规则的特点 4 第 2 章 我国非法证据排除规则对职务犯罪侦查带来的影响 .6 2.1 我国现阶段的职务犯罪侦查方式 6 2.1.1 职务犯罪的概念及职务犯罪案件的特点 .
