《我国行政诉讼调解制度研究(1)》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《我国行政诉讼调解制度研究(1)（45页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 IV摘 要 调解，作为一种重要的纠纷解决机制，在我国历史悠久，社会基础深厚，有着“东方奇葩”的美誉。我国现行立法已明确调解制度在民事诉讼中的地位，甚至在刑事诉讼领域都有其适用的空间，但在运用调解手段来解决行政争议时，却由于种种原因落后于实践的需要，出现了种种尴尬的情形。如何把调解引入到行政诉讼中来，使其充分发挥自身在解决行政纠纷时的优势，弥补行政审判的不足，成为本文的关键，本文共有六个部分组成，对此展开了详细的论述： 第一部分：首先，从“调解”的基本概念出发，综合分析了国内外对“调解”的这一法律术语的解释，得出调解的基本概念。继而以此为基础，进一步对行政诉讼调解的涵义做出了界定。最后通过行政
2、诉讼中的“调解”与“和解”辨析，行政诉讼调解与民事诉讼调解的比较分析，使得我们对行政诉讼调解有了充分的认识。 第二部分：主要介绍了我国行政诉讼的现状。首先指出行政诉讼立法上明确禁止了调解在行政诉讼中的适用，但行政赔偿案件除外，并对于法律作出如此规定的原因作了分析。然后，主要结合洛阳，东营，成都等法院所公布的关于行政诉讼案件的数据来说明行政诉讼在司法实践中的现状与存在的问题。 最后指出我国行政诉讼存在很大的问题现实立法与实践的悖谬。 实务界在行政诉讼中运用协调手段来处理案件已经取得了共识，并得到大范围的使用，而法律对于调解的运用在行政诉讼却是禁止的。 第三部分：主要介绍引入行政诉讼调解制度的必要
3、性。必要性是指引入行政诉讼调解的价值，是结合我国司法实践的现状得出的应然结果。本部分主要从四个方面出发。首先将调解引入行政诉讼与行政审判相结合更有利于行政诉讼目的的实现。其次，撤诉不能代替调解制度。再次，提高司法效率，节约司法资源的必然要求。最后，构建和谐社会的需要。 第四部分：介绍了在我国建立行政诉讼调解制度的可行性，即建立该制度所具备的条件。首先，伴随着现代社会的迅速发展，现代行政也发生着重大而深刻的变化。为行政诉讼调解制度的建构提供了现实的土壤。其次，对公权力不可处分的进行了再思考。再次，传统诉讼文化为调解的引入提供了思想支撑。最后，对域外行政诉讼调解制度的进行借鉴经验借鉴，指出调解制度
4、是可行的。 V第五部分：介绍了我国行政诉讼调解一般制度，包括两个层面：行政诉讼调解的基本原则，主要有调解自愿性原则、调解的有限性原则、合法性原则；行政诉讼调解的适用范围。 第六部分：主要论述了行政诉讼调解制度的具体程序设计。首先，是我国行政诉讼调解模式的选择， 指出我国行政诉讼调解模式的选择应当结合我国现代行政的特点与行政纠纷的特殊性采取“调审分离，审前调解”的模式。其次是行政诉讼调解程序的具体建构，包括调解程序的启动，调解员的选任，行政诉讼调解的组织等等。最后，介绍了行政诉讼调解与判决的关系。 关键词：调解，行政诉讼， 行政诉讼调解 VIABSTRACT Mediation, a kind
5、of important dispute resolution mechanism, in our country has a long history and profound social foundation, has “Oriental treasure“ reputation. Our current legislation has clearly mediation system in civil litigation the status, even in criminal lawsuit domain has its available space, but in use me
6、diation means solving administrative disputes, however, due to various reasons behind the practical needs, there were various embarrassing situation. How the mediation is introduced into the administrative litigation, make it give full play to its own administrative disputes , become the key of this
7、 article, this paper had six parts, which launched a detailed discussion: The first part: first, from “the basic concept of Mediation, the comprehensive analysis of domestic and international conciliation“ get the basic concept. Then based on the meaning of administrative litigation mediation made d
8、efined. Finally, through the “administrative litigation mediation“ and “reconciliation“ discrimination, administrative litigation mediation and civil litigation mediation of comparative analysis of administrative lawsuit, make we get full understanding of mediation. Part two: mainly introduces the p
9、resent situation of administrative litigation. First of all that administrative litigation legislation expressly prohibit the mediation in administrative litigation of applicable, but except for cases, and administrative compensation for legal make such regulations, it analyzes the reasons public ri
10、ghts shall not dispose of bondage, because the purpose of traditional judge decided, allowing the mediation could damage the social welfare, out of the administrative relative person benefit protection consideration. Then, the main combination luoyang, dongying, chengdu and other courts published ab
11、out administrative litigation of data to illustrate the administrative litigation in judicial practice on the status and existing problems, such as high withdraw rate, increase annually in the case of type tendency, and involve the administrative areas widely, coordinate reconciliation processing of
12、 cases, the VIIcourt is relatively concentrated in litigation dominant coordination work. At last, it points out that there exists much administrative litigation, the problem of the reality of the perverse legislation and practice. Practice in the administrative lawsuit using coordination means to h
13、andle cases has made consensus, and get a wide range of USES, and law regarding the use of mediation in administrative litigation really prohibited. Part three: mainly introduced into the necessity of administrative litigation mediation system. Necessity is the guide into the administrative litigati
14、on mediation of value, is the present situation of justice practice in our country that deserved result. This part will start from four aspects. First will introduce administrative litigation mediation and administrative trial combined will make conducive to the realization of administrative litigat
15、ion purposes. Secondly, withdraw cannot replace mediation system. Again, improving judicial efficiency, economize the inevitable requirement of judicial resources. Finally, constructing the harmonious society needs. Part four: introduced in China has established the feasibility of administrative lit
16、igation mediation system, namely, to establish the system has the condition. First, along with the rapid development of modern society, modern administration has also undergone a major and profound change. For the construction of administrative litigation mediation system provides the reality of the soil. Secondly, public power shall not dispose of further thinking. Again, the traditional litigation culture for the introduction of mediation providing an ideological support. Finally, the
