德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank

上传人:管****问 文档编号:109331368 上传时间:2019-10-26 格式:PDF 页数:40 大小:4.24MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank_第1页
第1页 / 共40页
德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank_第2页
第2页 / 共40页
德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank_第3页
第3页 / 共40页
德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank_第4页
第4页 / 共40页
德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank_第5页
第5页 / 共40页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《德意志银行-英国-非食品零售业-价值而不是价值陷阱-20170907-UK Non-Food Retail Value not value traps-Deutsche Bank(40页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、7 September 2017 Retail - Non Food UK Non-Food Retail Retail Retail - Non Food Recommendation Change Europe United Kingdom Industry UK Non-Food Retail Date 7 September 2017 Deutsche Bank Markets Research Value not value traps UK non-food outlook appears bleak, except for the value and online retaile

2、rs Two years ago we asked where has the money gone?. Household disposable income had been strengthening but general retail sales growth had not. Unfortunately, the answer was not that households had been re-building the savings ratio: this had fallen from 12% in 2010 to 8% by 2015, and has since tum

3、bled to just 1.7% in Q1 17. Many other economic indicators today are trending similarly to the austerity years of 2011/2 - not a disaster given the political upheaval of the past two years. We think the squeezed consumer will seek out value and we see AB Foods Primark and B downgrading WH Smith to H

4、old This report changes ratings, price targets, and/or estimates for several companies, detailed in Figure 1. We reiterate our Buy ratings on AB Foods, B second, that consumers were not using healthy cashfl ows to save more. This report argues: 1. The UK environment is tough but not disastrous. Cons

5、umer confi dence is at historic average levels (Figure 2), household cashfl ows are broadly fl at year on year (Figure 12), unemployment is at record-low levels (Figure 8), and interest rates remain supportive (Figure 18). There are clear warning signals, of course. Most confi dence metrics have wea

6、kened (Figure 25), infl ation has been eroding real wage growth (Figure 11), unsecured lending is at post-2008 peaks (Figure 14) and the savings ratio is at a 20-year low (Figure 13). 2. Overall consumption has not yet slowed materially. Total UK retail sales growth has remained quite healthy, accor

7、ding to both the Offi ce of National Statistics and the British Retail Consortium (Figures 4 and 5). However, food retail sales growth is now outperforming non-food sales growth by a material amount (Figure 23). This last happened during the infl ationary austerity years at the start of the decade a

8、nd contrasts with the three years between Sep-13 and Sep-16 when the non-food sub-sector was the outperformer. 3. The consumer has less room to manoeuvre and is having to make some tough choices. To us, the current economic situation resembles the austerity years of 2011/2. However, the consumer doe

9、s not have the fl exibility that, back then, a savings ratio of c.8% aff orded them. The savings ratio was just 1.7% in Q1 2017. The consumers higher spend on food retail relates to higher infl ation in this category, while the continued outperformance of experiences (leisure) over stuff (non-food r

10、etail) remains a shift in tastes. For non-food the implications are, in our view, a no-growth environment (Figure 47) and some likely material market share shifts as the consumer struggles. 4. Trading down is happening, though it is not always easy to see. Consumer behaviour is complex and we should

11、 not expect to see a clean picture of consumers trading down to lower-priced retailers and goods. One might expect trading down to lead to lower average selling prices in apparel, but actually prices are increasing (Figure 30) as retailers pass on higher input costs and consumers are showing discoun

12、t fatigue. And yet the mid-market is losing share to value (Figure 35). This suggests that consumers may be shopping less but are comfortable paying full/high price for certain products (e.g. products off ering fashion newness) and also that the retailers have passed on price infl ation caused by cu

13、rrency movements. We do see clearer recent evidence of trading down from our apparel consumer survey (Figure 31) and also in the food retail market (Figure 55). Sometimes the consumer is dialling out infl ation by trading down within the same retailer, rather than switching retailers, but we also sh

14、ow that premium- Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 3 7 September 2017 Retail - Non Food UK Non-Food Retail positioned M * All EPS and target prices in GBp. For December year ends FY17/18 refers to FY17 WH Smith (downgraded from Buy to Hold, TP unchanged at 1950p) We have been long-term bulls on WH Smith,

15、 rating the stock a Buy for almost exactly 9 of the past 10 years. In our view, the company remains in good shape, with a number of prospective drivers of future earnings growth. Its Cardmarket discount format trial, which we would describe as being on pause, could prove successful and off er upside

16、, for example. We believe consensus earnings risk Deutsche Bank AG/London Page 5 7 September 2017 Retail - Non Food UK Non-Food Retail is modestly to the upside, and a CY18E FCF yield of c.6% provides downside protection. However, the stock trades on CY18E P/E of 16.6x, EV/Sales of 1.6x and EV/EBIT 14.0x, and is close to our unchanged target price (based on DCF valuation); we downgrade to Hold. Our target price for WH Smith is based on DCF, using a weighted average cost of capital (WACC

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 商业/管理/HR > 经营企划

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号