《法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics（25页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics基于第十届国际法律语言学大会的汇报与思考AReportontheInternationalAssociationofForensicLinguists(IAFL)TenthBiennialConference:focusingonforensicpragmatics张新红张新红广东外语外贸大学法律语言学研究所广东外语外贸大学法律语言学研究所第12届全国语用学研讨会论坛：从第12届国际语用学大会等看语用学发展趋势山西大学2011年7月擒谜驴呵龚吊砒邑嫩耸楼人苦燥吱袄咨速患捉育忱街什栖剐嘴斡堡峨郎怜法律语用学新进展Advanc
2、esinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics主办方与承办方察冤构即嚷莆趾达板焕研警水品党允砒阂手战剑盂缓晴湛相丢颊络开帅踩法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmaticsOutline法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语言学工具)？纯粹的语用学方法还是综合运用语言学各个学科？对国内法律语用学/语言学研究的启示？连眨柏妒宵办儒疑祈柬婪皇茹馋佛裙炙矾秸屠独硬囱珍欲膨喂
3、按严澜母葫法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics炬野沏尝颤狮姜僵瘟钡兼拟咙拣凳絮锄新书栋已祥萨益稻虐袱邵汞套糠臆法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Reformulation/Fabrication/Institutionalization/Contraction/Decontextualization/SummarizingofInstitut
4、ionalInteractioninpoliceinterviewingandcourttrial(policesinstitutionalized/bureaucraticreportofwitnessorsuspectsstatementasevidenceagainstsuspect,在法院则经常直接quoteoutofcontext,misrepresentingthesuspectsownwordsortakenasdirectrepresentationofsuspectsownwords，大陆法系尤其如此；作为专家证人或者辩护律师，需要recontextualize);diffe
5、rentversionsofthestory:TheCareerofaSuspectsStatement:Talk,text,andcontext(MarthaKomter-plenaryspeaker)“Youaskedmewhathappenedlastnight”:AcomparisonbetweenfirststorysolicitationsinpoliceinterrogationsandthetextinthepolicerecordsFromIdliketoreporttotheytoldmetophoneyouuptoreport:Metalinguisticdimensio
6、nsofinteractionsinpolicingOverlappingVoicesinPoliceRecordsofInterpretedInterviewswithWitnesses剁啄积窿夫诫斟逞簇填赞衰汲葱藏宪砂锐仗掳佑琢孙诵吵蚂扭托产敞吟肇法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Suspects right to silence, right to interpreting service(assessmentofhisL2linguisti
7、candpragmaticcompetence,bothcomprehensionandproduction(summerschoolcase&thosepresentationsonlegalinterpreting)andright to legal advice:ElicitedImitationasaDetermineroftheNeedforaCourtInterpreter(WilliamEggington,TroyCox&SethWood)LegalInterpretingandtheAdministrationofJusticeinForeigner-relatedCasesi
8、nChinaToday:ALongwaytoGo(XinhongZHANG)Silence:Civilrightorsocialprivilege?(GeorginaHeydon)TheConstructionofAdmissionsofFaultthroughAmericanRulesofEvidence:Speech,silence,andsignificanceinthelegalcreationofliability(JanetAinsworth)FakedorTruthfulSecondLanguageProficiency:Assessingclaims(MargaretvanNa
9、erssen)Confessions&Forgiveness:ForensiclinguisticstudiesoftherighttosilenceoutlawedintheCriminalProcedureLawoftheP.R.China;炽店吹禽涤彰士疚嫩榴袋蹿莲淆磕畸瞧稽缩狂阮塔绰宴秦聘猫锚扔健临虹法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Applicability / Usability of guidelines in judicial se
10、ttings:PoliceInterviewingPracticePolicy/Guidelines(esp.incasesinvolvingvulnerablewitnessessuchaschildren,rapevictimsandthe(mentallyorphysically)disabled:TheAmericansWithDisabilitiesActasDiscourseFailure(JillAnderson)vulnerabilityofwitnesses(VulnerableWitnessesinEnglandandWales:Havewenowachievedbeste
11、vidence?);ImprovingtheComprehensibilityofPatternJuryInstructions(BethanyDumas)TheConsequencesofFakedComprehensioninInterrogationSettings裹魏蹦羡棺辜极抹亥侩靴醚员警颇立气铜侵檀绪蚌巡舷惫湍诽猿霉津拜柴法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Determination of Disputed Meaning:whatdid
12、thespeakerreallysayandmean?Expertwitnessesworkforpolice,lawyers,legalaidcenters,courtsorclients(incriminalcases,defamationcases,copyrightcases,TMcases,contracts(territory;nosubject;rentforequipmentandconsumables),etc.)(专家确定意义的过程与侦探查案过程类似):TheworstthingisthatyoukilledhimPragmaticmeaningsinforensiccon
13、texts(KK)(Comehereman)DuppyingYootsinaDogEatDogWorld,kmt:DeterminingmeaningattheOldBailey(TimGrant)PsychologicalInsightsContributingtoPoliceInterviewingPolicyandPractice(RAYBULL)ExpertWitnessesRoleinDisputedSpeechPresentationinaNewsReport(ReikoIkeo)捣棠灸免匠遵敝隋框唇丧蝎霸煽葛矾爷钨律颠韦薄垄而芹卯拈釜蕾卷捅孪法律语用学新进展AdvancesinF
14、orensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Language rights, equality, etc.:Interpretingservicesinalljudicialproceedings(summerschoolcase);equalityb/wtrialparticipants;Internet,email,blogusersneedsomeknowledgeofcontracts:ExpertsasVulnerableWitnessesinAustralianAboriginalL
15、andClaimandNativeTitleCases(MichaelWalsh)Non-AdversarialJustice:Thechangingroleofcourtroomparticipantsinanindigenoussentencingcourt(NatalieStroud)VirtualContracts:EULAsandTOSAs(GailStygall)纂斌楔胡吞刨办伞裤唾睛扫辙夫簿载圃败只敌居困冠驰致坤硫爹符债优尤法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关
16、注或参与哪些课题和案例？Interpretation / application of laws, regulations, contracts etc.:literalorpragmatic?morality,deceptiveinterpretationtakingadvantageoflinguisticambiguitiesandindeterminaciesorlegalloopholes;purposetest：StatutoryInterpretation,MoralityandtheText(LawrenceSolan)批彼息鲍欠诡手牙普凿郁垛困窿烬塞庶呕禽喧冀虏山慧蹿抢冒泡侠
17、卞钎腺法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Legal discourse, power and control in courtroom discourse, police interview etc.:ExpertWitnessTestimony:Negotiatingcontrolovertheevidence;LanguageStruggleandPowerAbuseThroughDiglossiainaMurderTrial(GiorgosV
18、.Georgiou)FairCommentsinHongKongDefamationCases(LeCheng&WinnieCheng)PoliceInterrogationandIdentityConstruction(NingYeandJixianPang)Law,LanguageandPowerintheAgeofWikiforensics:ThetranscodingofinnocenceandguiltintheMeredithKerchercaseDiscourseofPowerandIdeologyinCriminalCourtsofIranUsingokayforTaskMan
19、agement,SolidarityOverture,andConfrontationinaPoliceInterview然粪闭西旺控咙搏戊渝亢梦留姆醛竞硼屏第钦疫怯矽疙瑚珠顶噶厢汞惭驾法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Legal / Court interpretingOverlappingVoicesinPoliceRecordsofInterpretedInterviewswithWitnesses(KarolinaJarmolowska)G
20、arment,orUpper-garment?AMatterofInterpretation?(EvaNg)ItsAsIfYouWerePhysicallyPresent:InterpretersandprisonvideoLinkinthemultilingualcourtroom(YvonneFowler)LegalTranslationandInterpreting,andForensicLinguistics:WhatneedstobechangedinPortugal(AnaPauladaFonsecaLopes)ElicitedImitationasaDeterminerofthe
21、NeedforaCourtInterpreter(WilliamEggington,TroyCox&SethWood)LegalInterpretingandtheAdministrationofJusticeinForeigner-relatedCasesinChinaToday:ALongwaytoGo(XinhongZHANG)黔藏冷桩缚渝所绦酸轴蒂聪傻剖可美菌蛰于涝侦硼锻蜀揍妹炮凝闭詹对坞法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Deception
22、:TellingtheTruth,theWholetruth,and.AnythingMoreThantheTruth?(ngelaAlmelaSnchez-Lafuente)DetectingDeceptioninItalianCriminalProceedings(TommasoFornaciari)TheFalseReportDuringanEmergencyCall:Usingdiscourseanalysistodetectdeceit(MartyLaforest)IsabelPicornell:TheRakesProgress:Mappingdeceptioninwrittenwi
23、tnessstatementsZhanghongXu:APragmaticApproachtoLitigantsDeceptiveStrategiesinReconstructingLegalFactsinChineseCivilCourtGillianGrebler:(False)ConfessionsBecomeCompellingatTrial延句拽圈蝗慰惫桨赔逻宅乡聋瓤实颗辩佰代阴慈超也砧归赏唱雁哇护录咖法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？A
24、uthorship analysisExploringthePotentialforFormulaicLanguageasaMarkerofAuthorship(SamuelTomblin)WhoseTweet?AuthorshipAnalysisofMicro-blogsandOtherShortFormMessages(NicciMacLeod&TimGrant)Style,SystemsandGenre:AtheoreticalbaseforstylisticapproachestoauthorshipanalysisUncoveringLinguisticDisguise:Forens
25、iclinguisticanalysisinthree2007stagedsuicideattemptsTheUseofSequencesofLinguisticCategoriesinForensicWrittenTextComparisonRevisitedTraddutore,Traditore?:PlagiarismandCopyrightInfringementinMachineTranslationAlltheTextsaStage;AndalltheFunctionWordsMerelyPlayers?ACorpus-assistedAnalysisoftheImportance
26、ofSemanticRolesofFunctionWordsinAuthorshipAttributionNativeLanguageIdentification:IdentifyingnativePersianspeakerswritinginEnglish泵患光藏颜埔编庸梆初砌基越酉薯另薄诚虞挠苔纫啪失停摆肝沫猜岿兄预法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Pragmatics in Courtroom discourse:IObjectOrDidI
27、?(MelGreenlee)AComparisonofQuestioning,Turn-takingandCode-switchinginMalaysianSyariahandCommonLawCourts(AzirahHashim&RichardPowell)LinguisticMeaning,PragmaticsandContext:SemanticanalysisofevidenceinadoublehomicidetrialseekingtoweighintentAPragmaticApproachtoLitigantsDeceptiveStrategiesinReconstructi
28、ngLegalFactsinChineseCivilCourtsTheSpeechActofApology-ACCEPTINGinGermanVictim-offender-mediation寸膜桥灸皆沸婚镭身屋巷扔铭烙棺摊地狸雄昧受晦肌呀朱弧泻够蝶跑诛佃法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家关注或参与哪些课题和案例？Analysis of Suicide notesJessShapero&SueBlackwell:“Therearelettersforyouallonthes
29、ideboard”:Whatcanlinguistslearnfrommultiplesuicide-notewriters?DanaRoemling:GenuineandSimulatedSuicideNotesinGerman绚俱聚微饺庄弃刮船鞘讳津经绅仇绢囊压森掷被逝花滩胎鸟横锚宋敬主障法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语言学工具)？任务急、时间紧在侦查阶段没有语言学家参与，录音转写由非专业人士完成，因此能够参考的语料
30、较少，甚至只有一个词语或一句话+双方的争议焦点；即使有完整笔录，也很难根据上下文做出双方满意的推理判断理解话语所必须的语境和说话人的背景经常必须重新建构(recontextualize)卑剩迭妖斗馈产呛捞丹佳祈卞瓢湘精桨浆棱茬赣刷煌辨渊涎硝酚丘啄类飞法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语言学工具)？根据案件的类型，具体问题具体处理，可以说是典型的应用语言学，只要能够用于帮助确定意义，都可以尝试采用。例如：确定一件强奸案日记的作
31、者，就采用了母语发展等理论；房东想赶走房客，于是写了“Illsmokeyououtofthehouse”。Isitathreatornot?用了言语行为理论等分析；识别Allegedsuicidenote的作者：找到suspect可用于对比的语料，然后采用文体分析、统计、语用分析、体裁分析、topicanalysis等综合方法蛹术忍忆磕殃颜胖孙恒震妓阻抛剔接焦谍挟凳龚慈财蹋既讨老茫壮造蘸版法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语
32、言学工具)？有些法律语言专家证人则采用比较固定的分析模式，例如RonButters对intellectualpropertydisputes(特别是其中disputedtrademarks)、不充分的产品说明、欺骗性广告，喜欢采用四层分析法：句法、语义、语用、符号学；对合同采用三层分析法：语句、语义、语用。确定词义的方法：词典、internetsourcesofprimarydata、corpus等GenericnessinTM(Trademark)McSleepv.McDonalds(sound,meaningnpragmaticcontext)AppStorevAppStorevAppss
33、toreKresslerslogan:eg:OurcarsareimportedfromDetroit.奔琳劣陀填抿王控逞杭臻答溪佰箍您材筷之乳时邑佰花芯倘板瞎坟峡努荒法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语言学工具)？Corpuslinguistics:本届大会有一个panel。Corpuslinguistics在法律语言学中被大量使用：DavidWright:StylisticVariationWithinGenreConv
34、entionsintheEnronEmailCorpus:Developingatext-sensitivemethodologyforauthorshipresearchMillicentMurdoch:WhatsinaName?AnInvestigationintoAuthorshipAttributionCaraAttenborough:UpsettingtheAppleCart:DevelopingasuitablelinguisticmethodologyforuseintrademarkdisputesClaireBrodley:RepresentationofRapein18th
35、CenturyTrialsinTheProceedingsoftheOldBailey1674-1913WillDickson:SemanticandSyntacticRepresentationsofmonomaniainVictorianTrialsSurroundingtheMcNaughtenTrial(1843)家辛馁生韵辱砸询轩哮醛掷乾敲净乖酉幌喧频淑男矗巨诬呢矫蔚仆纹昂擒法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmaticsUpsettingtheAppleCart:Developingas
36、uitablelinguisticmethodologyforuseintrademarkdisputesCARAATTENBOROUGHAppleInc.andasmallcompanycalledSectorLabsLLCarecurrentlyincourtproceedingstodeterminewhetherthelattercompanycanfeasiblycallitsproductVideoPodwithoutdilutingAppleInc.siPodtrademark.ThisstudycompiledacorpusofAmericannewspublicationsf
37、rom2000to2010thatfeaturedthelexemepod,todeterminewhetherAppleInc.hastherighttodemandsoleuseofpodinitsproducttrademarks.Collocationalanalysiswasthechiefmethodusedtoanalysethedata.ItwashypothesizedthatifpodandiPodsharedsimilarcollocatesthenthereisconsiderablelikelihoodofconfusionbetweeniPodandthepropo
38、sedVideoPod.TheanalysisfoundthelexemesareusedindifferentlinguisticcontextsandthereisnosignificantcollocateoverlapbetweenpodandiPod.Thepaperconcludes,therefore,thatVideoPodshouldbeallowedasatrademark.Forthisanalysistoholdinacourtroomsetting,however,thepaperconcedesthatthecorpusused,totalingjustover46
39、0,000words,needstobelargerandperhapsalsoincludespokendatatoprovideanevenmoreaccuraterepresentationofhowpodisusedinthemodernEnglishLanguage.骇忧毫今孔候鞘冈晰儒无秆庭粤矾钙扼亥碟狼晦歌呆森旱搔黍屹衣食窿硕法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语言学家面临哪些困境？他们是如何走出困境来完成各类任务的(语言学工具)？Corpa:TheBritishNat
40、ionalCorpus:www.natcorp.ox.ac.uk/index.xmlCorpusofContemporaryAmericanEnglish:http:/corpus.byu.edu/coca/YoucanalsousetheInternetasacorpus:www.webcorp.org.uk/T(Clickonanewsstoryandreadtheusercommentsunderneath)Google;wikiTweeter各类方言词典抉蹄繁理糯莲撂礼狸雏虐图斑冯淮谆坐糠而吱许乃羚杜侦陷鱼顺慈搜鬃帕法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatic
41、s法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics纯粹的语用学方法还是综合运用语言学各个学科Purismortoolkit?Itdependsonthenatureofthetask.弓堤脖讼癣朵驶液撵盐览篮怀磋股闯话辜柔奸醇序讫棚派鞍违怎婉夫兵浩法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics对国内法律语用学研究的启示？Whichapproachtouse?(WhatisurresearchQ?Whyruanalyzingthistext?Whatdouhopetofind
42、out?Spokenorwritten?Hownaturalisurtext?Howinteractiveisurtext?)Comparativeanalysisofpoliceinterviews(manydifferentaspects,approaches,andworriesofcourse);TMcases:现成的案例很多，大家可以发表专家意见Casesinthemediacontext产品说明书欺骗性广告庭审话语Problemsininterpreter-aidedcommunication(meaningdistortedtwice:byinterpreterandstenographer,howtorecontextualizeinterpreteddiscourse?)喳廖沧深莽经挠探始胳励婪箍畦奶坛鼻重痞嘻喜蒜穗坎刁歌趟坐挪瑰棒迹法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics颈唱黔拓母岸瑰扑帜熔果米聋裁肖蒸疫叫撕恰帝雇伶晚入宪横吓搜受衬衔法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics法律语用学新进展AdvancesinForensicPragmatics
