《语言文化论文-用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《语言文化论文-用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为.doc（11页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、语言文化论文-用语言学的方法分析短消息语言和行为Abstract：This paper begins with an introduction to mobile-based short massage, or SM for short. Although the arrival of SM brings convenience and happiness to peoples life, the characteristics of SM language result in its vulnerability to misunderstanding. From a linguistic p
2、erspective, factors responsible for the misunderstanding of SM are analyzed. Firstly, SM language violates the co-operative principle. People adopt a cooperative principle when they communicate with each other: they try to get along with each other by following certain conversational “maxims”. The v
3、iolation of these maxims makes the functions of SM indefinite and SM users have to interpret SM based on their own experience. Secondly, in contrast with face-to-face conversations and telephone calls, SM lacks body language, facial expressions, proper stress and intonation. Thirdly, SM language is
4、more casual than written language. In conclusion, this paper suggests some solutions to the related problem.Key words: short massage or SM, misunderstanding, cooperative principle, body language, facial expression, intonation, stress, written language 摘要：本文的开头对移动电话的短消息（又称短信）作了简要的介绍。尽管短消息的出现给人们带来了方便，
5、短消息自身语言的特点导致了它容易被人们误解。从语言学的角度，本文分析了导致短信被误解的几个因素。第一，短消息语言违背了合作原则。人们在交际过程中，常常会采用一种准则。为了很好的交流，人们回遵守“会话准则”。而短信语言对准则的违背，导致了短信的作用不明确。并且，人们在解释短信内容时，往往只根据自己的经验。第二，与面对面的谈话和电话通讯相比，短信缺少肢体语言、表情、适当的重音和语调。第三，短信语言与书面语言相比，具有随意性。文章的结尾对相关的问题提出了解决的办法。关键词：短消息或短信、误解、合作原则、肢体语言、表情、重音、语调、书面语言An Analysis of Short Message La
6、nguage and Behaviors with a Linguistic ApproachThesis statement: Short message is vulnerable to misunderstanding, which can be explained by the violation of the cooperative principle, and in contrast with traditional conversation and written language, the deficiency of short message is analyzed.Outl
7、ine I Introduction II The vulnerability of SM to misunderstanding from the perspective of the cooperative principleA. Introduction of cooperative and the violation of maximsB. Three kinds of misunderstanding The indefinite nature of the senders message A number of factors affecting the interpretatio
8、n of SM The query concerning the end of SM conversationIII The deficiency of SM in contrast with face-to-face conversation and TEL call A. The lack of body language and expression B. The lack of stress and intonationIV The casualness of SM in contrast with written language A. SM processed at random
9、B. The differences between SM language and written languageV ConclusionI IntroductionShort Message Service (SMS) is a new communicational tool that combines the functions of mobile phone and pager. According to the statistics from Global GPS Association, the total number of SMs has reached 510 billi
10、on in 2003, and China accounts for one third of them, soaring to 170 billion. SM is regarded as a convenient, highly democratic, informational medium for conveying messages that conforms well to human needs. As a modern communication tool, SM has many advantages which are absent in other communicati
11、on medias. For example, SM enables dumb people to communicate freely with healthy people; SM makes no noise which may bother others; SM protects privacy, because no third party knows the content of SM conversation.However, the characteristics of SM language also bring negative effects to peoples lif
12、e. People find that SM is not so powerful and pleasant, and it can be easily misunderstood. With the help of linguistic approaches, factors that are responsible for the misunderstanding of SM are analyzed: 1). the violation of the cooperative principle. 2) SM can not take the place of face-to-face c
13、onversation. 3) SM is more casual than written language.II The vulnerability of SM to misunderstanding from the perspective of the cooperative principleThe process of sending SM is so easy and informal that people treat it as they do conversation. SM is a bit like a conversation at the water cooler
14、that can be instantly forwarded to 50 people. For a conversation to be successful, in most social contexts, the participants need to feel they are contributing something to it and are getting something out of it. For this to happen, certain conditions must apply. Everyone must have an opportunity to
15、 speak: no one should be monopolizing or constantly interrupting. The participants need to make their roles clear; they need to have a sense of when to speak or stay silent; when to proffer information or hold it back; when to stay aloof or become involved.The success of a conversation depends not o
16、nly on what speakers say but on their whole approach to the interaction. “Our talk exchanges do not normally consist of a succession of disconnected remarks, and would not be rational if they did. They are characteristically, to some degree at least, cooperative efforts; and each participant recognizes in them, to some extent, a common purpose or set of purposes, or at least a mutually accepted direction
