《起落架是飞机上众多关键组件》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《起落架是飞机上众多关键组件（6页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、起落架是飞机上众多关键组件之一，飞机起落架的基本功能是在地面上实现 的，包括滑跑、起飞和着陆。在上述中、最重要的一部分就是着陆部分，因为它 包括许多能量的转换，并且在一些情况下系统一定要足够稳定。一些约束条件和 需求对于起落架的性能来说，包括耐久性、平顺性、重量、高度、冲程、起落架 收上和转向。以上所述的性能在地面操作上实现合理的性能必须做出恰当的优 化。虽然有很多不同的起落架模型，但是传统的模型还是包括轮胎部分、缓冲器 部分、支承结构部分。轮胎部分包括一个主要车轮装配连接机身和一个前轮装配 连接到机头。有三种常见的起落架布局：后三点式，前三点式、串联式起落架。 本论文主要研究前三点式起落架。
2、在着陆期间，主轮也就是后排机轮首先与地面 接触，然后机头部分的轮胎也就是前轮与地面接触。一般有三种为前起落架所采 用的几何图形布局，包括套筒式、铰接式、和半铰接式。如图 1.1。图 1.1 起落架轮胎布局套筒式轮胎布局设计在运动学上来说很简单，但在几何学上来讲得不到大的 支撑力量。自从支撑在表达冲击设计两端铰接,它仅产生的轴向力,并减少轴颈摩 擦力,却使得运动变得复杂。冲击支撑在半铰接设计中只是一端铰接,但性能可以 通过选择适当的齿轮参数进行优化。两个主要的起落架性能：（a）降落过程中的性能。（b）飞机滑跑、着陆和随 后的缓冲中轨道粗糙度对励磁性能的影响。高水平的瞬变激发在着陆期间必须控 制的
3、平滑，为了实现稳态在合理的时间内。1.2 起落架领域的发展飞机起落架的设计和发展有着大量的科研成果，大部分的科研成果都是在某 些特定的情况下做出来的。在起落架设计的各个环节中， Currey 通过实验成果 与经验总结，很好的描述了起落架的性能需求和缓冲器的设计。来自美国国家航 空宇宙航行局的 Jocelyn 也细节的解释了起落架动态特性，尤其是在摆动和制动 过程的振动，并且很好的总结了工作文件在过去的10 年里，突显了解决振荡问 题上的最新成果。依照他们的工作，起落架振荡包括由自身引起的振动称为摆动 和制动过程的振动。可能性的原因对于摆动是低扭转刚度，在装置中有过多的空 转，车轮的不平衡或磨损
4、的部件。制动过程包括装置行驶，尖叫和振荡等由摩擦 特性导致的，介于刹车系统旋转和非旋转部分。这篇文章也解释了 Moreland 在 飞机起落架动态理论中所做的工作。Moreland发现为了更加准确的描述系统和 振动现象，数学模型的建立需要 5个自由变量：轮胎偏差、旋转角度、支撑偏差、 阻尼器的联系应变和机体运动。尽管这些自由变量数据看起来比较难以处理，但 是他们对于充分理解实质性的工作条件发挥着相当重要的作用。WKruger et al 在宽广的理念中备份了飞机起落架动态特性，涵盖了在 控制方面的着陆和地面操纵。有两个控制观念对自动控制系统很有益：(a) 在一个完全活动的悬浮执行机构提供了动力
5、，它被直接称为一个控制 法则。(b) 在一个半主动悬浮中，只有阻尼力在瞬间减震器取代方向上被调整去 控制阻尼系数。他们的工作分析了设计要求的问题并对所有变量的系统进行仿 真。由于缺少高性能计算设备，为了减少结果方程的复杂程度，大多数早期的模 型都是非常简单的， D.Yadav 和 R.P.Ramamoorthy 在 Yadav 和 Kapadia 所研究的 举模型的基础上进行了更加深入的分析。这个飞机模型通过两轮减震器弹簧被理 想化的作为刚性梁。大多数的轮子和其中的联系是集中在各自近似为轴轮和簧载 质量，被认为铰链和纵摇的自由度。举模型忽略了纵摆自由度及其耦合模型，而举投模型合并这些效应分析数
6、 据。在着陆冲击时，举模型运用了两轮铰链式前起落架和套管式伸缩的主轮几何 模型。他们也第一次学习了联动动力学对于变形的轮胎减震支柱的影响。模型如 图 1.2 所示。本文中，铰接前起落架有三个缓冲参数一锐孔流量系数(Cd)，初始空气压 力(Po)和气动范围(Aa)被选做变量。通过不同的锐孔流量系数作用于前起落 架，系统行为表明着陆应该产生更小的振幅。这不会有主要的影响在最大振幅的反弹质量。他们也概括了一个着陆更小的初始空气压力，这可以为冲击增加时间，1.1Overview of Landing GearsOne of the many critical components that make
7、an aircraft function is the landing gear. The basic function of a landing gear on an aircraft is to maneuver it during its gr ound operations which include taxi, takeoff and landing. Of these, the most critical ph ase is the landing because it involves a massive amount of energy transfer and the sys
8、temhas to best able enough to operate under these conditions. Some of the constrai nts and requirements for the performance of landing gears are crash survivability, riding performance, weight, height, stroke length, retraction, and steering. All of the above would have to be optimized for the reaso
9、nable performance of an aircraft on its ground operations.Although there are so many different variants of the landing gear models, the conventional one has a tired wheel unit, a shock absorbing unit and a supporting structure 1. The wheel unit has a main wheel assembly attached to the fuselage and
10、a nose wheel assembly attached to the nose of the aircraft. There are three common types of landing gear: conventonal, tricycle, and tandem. This work has been confined to the tricycle type of landing gear. During landing, the main wheels come in contact with the ground first which is called the tou
11、chdown and then the nose wheel makes contact with the ground.套筒式萤接式半较接式Fig. 1 . 1 Landing gear typesThe telescopic design is kinematically simpler but the geometry may not account for the large strut forces. Since the shock strut in the articulated design has both end hinged, it produces only axial
12、forces and so doe minimize the journal frictional forces, but at the cost of complex kinematics. The shock strut in the semi articulated gear design has only one end hinged, but the performance can be optimized by proper selection of gear parameters.The two major concerns for landing gear performanc
13、e are:(a) behavior during touch down impact.(b) and performance excitation induced by track roughness during taxi, takeoff and the later part of landing runs. The high level of transients induced during touchd own have to be controlled smoothly in order to achieve the stady state in a reasonable amo
14、unt of time.1.2.Developments in the Field of Landing GearsThere has been considerable research in the field of landing gear design and devel opment and most of these works are specific to a particular case under consideration. The various steps in .landing gear design, its performance requirements a
15、nd shock strut design are well described by Currey , based on experience and experiments. Jocelyn of NASA has explained in detail the landing gear dynamics, especially shimmy and brake-induced vibration and has well summarized the work documented from the last ten years to highlight the latest effor
16、ts in solving these vibration problems. According to their work, the landing gear vibration includes self-induced oscillations called shim my and brakeinduced vibration. Possible causes for shimmy are low torsional stiffness excessive freeplay in the gear, wheel imbalance, or worn parts. Brake-induced vibrati on includes gear walk, squeal and chatter, which are caused by the frictional character istics between the brake rotating an
