《无张力修补术与腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《无张力修补术与腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较（1页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、龙源期刊网 http:/无张力修补术与腹腔镜下腹膜前修补术治疗腹股沟疝的效果比较作者：张帆来源：医学信息2019年第 17期表1两组手术指标比较伐土s)组别n手术时间(min)术中出血量(ml)疼痛评分(分)术后肛门排气时间(h)对照组5342.11+2.6925.884.814.821.103.260.64观察组5350.312.8919.514.512.11 0.341.550.37t5.2234.8923.7515.022P0.050.050.050.05表2两组术后并发症发生情况比较n(%)组别n切口感染尿潴留血肿阴囊水肿总发生率对照组532( 3.78)3(5.67)1(1.89)3
2、(5.67)9(16.98)观察组5301(1.89)2(3.78)1(1.89)4(7.54 )注:与对照组比较,#=0.036.7V0.05摘要：目的; 比较腹股沟疝无张力修补术与腹腔镜下腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝 的效果。方法;选取2018年5月2019年5月我院接诊的106例腹股沟疝患者，采用隨机数字 表法分为对照组和观察组，各 53例。对照组采用腹股沟疝无张力修补术，观察组采用腹腔镜 下腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术，比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、VAS评分、术后肛门排气时 间、并发症发生率以及复发率。结果;观察组手术时间(50.312.89) min长于对照组(42.112.69) m
3、in,术中出血量(19.514.51) ml、VAS 评分(2.110.34)分、术后肛门排气 时间(1.550.37) h均低于对照组的(25.884.81) ml、(4.821.10)分、(3.260.64) h,差 异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论;腹腔镜下腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效确切，对 患者创伤小，术后恢复快，减轻了患者术后疼痛。关键词：腹股沟疝;无张力修补术;腹腔镜;腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术Abstract：Objective; To compare the effect of tension-free inguinal hernia repair and laparos
4、copic peritoneal inguinal hernia repair for inguinal hernia.Methods; A total of 106 patients with inguinal hernia who were admitted to our hospital from May 2018 to May 2019 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group， with 53 cases in each group. In the control group， the
5、 inguinal hernia was repaired without tension. The observation group was treated with laparoscopic anterior peritoneal inguinal hernia. The operation time， intraoperative blood loss， VAS score， postoperative anal exhaust time， complication rate and recurrence were compared between the two groups rate.Results; he operation time of the observation group(50.312.89) min was longer than that of the control group(42.112.69) min， intraoperative blood loss(19.514.51) ml， VAS score(2.110.34)， postoperative anal exhaust time(1.550.37) h
