《供应商资质调查表中英文》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《供应商资质调查表中英文（11页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 SUPPLIER FACILITY SURVEYQMP7-4-1-01-00002供应商(Supplier):地址(Address):评价日期Date of assessment: 电话Phone: 传真Fax: 调查期间供应商联系人员名单/职务List of personnel contacted during audit / position title.联系人（Contact）：职务(Title)：蓝托考核小组(姓名及公司名称)Ranto Audit Team (Name & Ranto Facility)姓名（Name）： 单位/部门（Facility/Department）步骤Pr
2、ocess: （1） 不是所有问题都需填写. 因观察项（次要的不合格项）与风险项（主要的不合格项）之间有差异，因此考核人员要将考核要素归类并记下其状态。All questions do not have to be completed. For those discrepancies found that are a finding (minor unacceptable condition) or a risk (major not acceptable condition); the auditor will rank the element and describe the condit
3、ion.（2） 所有将要被审核的供应商都应被通知（在审核前必须将该调查表传真或发邮件给供应商）In all cases the supplier being audited will be notified.（3） 对于加“”的项目必须要审核到，并且就审核发现做出具体的描述。To“”items must be audited and make the detail description of findings。NA=回顾质量体系后该项元素不适用 NA = Not an Applicable element for the Quality System under review.NC= 未审核
4、项元素（此次调查中没有审核该项） NC = Not covered ( element not audited during this survey).本次供应商调查类型 新增供应商 供应商产品增加 供应商改进 供应商定期评估 定期回访Type of this Survey: New Supplier product increase Improvement Regular assessment Survey产品描述 Description of Product(s), Commodity(s) 调查审核结果SURVEY AUDIT RESULTS：公司(COMPANY)：等级（GRADE）：
5、审核项编号No. of Element Audited： 。（*年*月*日*号）考察的要素Max. Total Points Possible： 项（总为78项）。审核率Audited Percentage Score %（被审核的要素Points audited /所有要素Total points）总得分Total Points Scored： （被审核的要素每项所得分的累加值 Sum audited points）审核得分Audited Percentage Score （审核点数得分/总点数分之和Points Scored / Total Points Possible) 0-59 60
6、-70 70-84 85-100不满意 需改进 满意 优秀Unsatisfactory Needs Improvement Satisfactory Excellent 如：共审核了50项，该50项累计分值为158分，则审核得分为158/50*4=79分）经过审核,供应商可评定为Based on the findings of this audit the supplier is rated as 可以批准成为供应商 Approved sourcing may proceed with procurement 在对本次审核中发现的不能接受的不合格项采取纠正措施后可以被批准成为供应商；Appro
7、ved contingent on acceptance of the suppliers corrective action(s) to the unacceptable finding(s) submitted from this audit. 不满意。该供应商缺乏基本的生产条件和必须的产品质量保证过程。在其完成要求的纠正措施后再次审核。Unsatisfactory, this supplier lacks the basic requirements of the manufacturing and quality processes deem necessaryfor the prod
8、ucts under consideration. A re-audit will be required after the supplier implements their proposedcorrective action program.蓝托审核小组领导（Lead Ranto Auditor）：说明（Comments）： 评分方法：每项评分如下：SCORING PROCESS: Each element is scored as followed:0 缺乏必需的能力Point for the lack of activity required1 执行能力极低Point for min
9、imum or poorly implemented activities2 未能达到基本要求Points for activities which failed to meet the basic requirements 3 达到基本要求Points for meeting the basic requirements 4 超越期望Points for exceeding the requirements 用NC/NA表示削减没涉及到的或不适用的项目NC/NA or slash through the elements or section not covered or not appli
10、cable项目可以记作小数形式（例如：2.5）Sections may be scored in portions of a whole number (e.g., 2.5)16/04 1 SUPPLIER FACILITY SURVEY NA / NC SCOREA. 质量管理体系 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM1. 质量管理体系已经文件化且其在控制产品质量和相关过程中被证明是可适用的并且是可维持的。The quality management system is documented and it is available and maintained for use
11、by all personnel affecting quality of product and related processes观察项/风险项/说明Findings / Risk/ Comments: =保证程序和实际做法一致2. 为了达到持续改进，制定并实施质量改进计划。（例如：降低报废率，增加客户满意度，提高生产力，改进，节流等等）Ongoing quality improvements projects are defined and measured for continual improvement, ex. -scrap reduction, customer satisfa
12、ction, productivity, improvement, kaizen events, etc.观察项/风险项/说明Findings / Risk/ Comments: =对不合格进行统计分析，制定纠正措施3. 在控制产品和过程质量中，各类人员的质量责职在体系中已被有效地分配。Evidence available that system is maintained and responsibility held by all personnel effecting quality of product and processes.观察项/风险项/说明Findings / Risk/ Comments:=有没有在质量手册中规定各类人员的质量职责4. 该公司是否具有管理的长期稳定性。Does the company show signs of long term management stability?观察项/风险项/说明Findings / Risk/ Comments:=人员是否流动性大，管理层是否稳定B. 纠正措施体系 CORRECTIVE ACTION SYSTEMS1. 程序是否有效地规定了在产品质量有缺陷时能及时被发现并纠正
