《心得-SCI收录心得与技巧.doc》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《心得-SCI收录心得与技巧.doc（8页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、论文心得-SCI论文收录心得与技巧做为研究生,不可否认SCI论文在大家心目的地位,三年的硕士,或者再三年的博士,我们一直开为之奋斗着,痛苦着,快乐着而一些诸如submit,under review,reject,minor revision or major revision的字眼则时刻牵动着我们那脆弱而且不自信的心当稿件投出以后，想必你也像我一样每天不停的刷新邮件，而最害怕的莫过于看到I regret to have to inform you that.这样的消息了回想自己的点滴，以及最近小小的成功，我觉得我有必要，也有义务向各位朋友们分享硕博连读的第三年，具体说来是2008年初，我的两篇
2、论文先后被接收了，下面我想回忆一下两篇论文投稿以及被接收的过程第一篇：杂志：Talanta（.分）Received at Editorial Office: 18-SEP-2007Article revised: 15-JAN-2008Article accepted for publication: 18-JAN-2008专业：生物分析化学类说起这篇文章，可是让我痛苦了一整年，实验很多，做的很辛苦，数据相对繁多，由于这是我第一篇文章，写作方面也是摸石头过河，逐句的模仿为了写这篇文章，我仔细研读了该领域的大约篇文献，对别人写的好的句子，类似的句子都做了标记，在写作的过程中想起要表达什么意思的时
3、候马上随时翻阅，这样下来，每天写一小段，有时候甚至每天就写那么几小句，大约一个月后，我发现一篇包含abstract,intrduction,experiment,results and discussion初稿居然完成了 初稿完成后，放了大约个把星期不管，接着做其他的实验，待一个星期过后再来研读，发现文章写的错误百出，句子连贯性，逻辑性，以及整篇文章的通读性都很差，于是又是仔细研读别人的论文，学习再学习，每天读一点，回头看看自己的文章，再改一点，又是将近个把月，一篇有模有样的初稿出现了，这时候我迫不极待的想把文章投出去了，于是放了两三天后，写了个cover letter,花了一晚上时间（想必应
4、该也有人花一整个晚上在Elsevier投稿系统上的痛苦经历吧），把稿件投向了一个本领域的分析杂志稿件投出去大概半个月，收到了主编的信，主编认为我能回答他的问题，以及按他的意见修改就可能出版可能是经验欠缺，我在收到信后的一个星期，就把修改稿返回了过去，对其中的提到的不足和问题我只是在文章中引用了其他一些文献和做了自己的说明，显然，这样的举动在主编和认为是很不认真的，过了一个月后，收到了Final Decision，那就是拒绝了Dear *, On behalf of the editor handling your manuscript, I am writing to you in refer
5、ence to your manuscript entitled:*I regret to have to inform you that your manuscript is not suitable for publication in *. This decision has been reached in light of the comments made by the referees. The detailed remarks are appended below.Reviewers comments: Reviewer 1: * seemed to contain suffic
6、ient material for publication purpose. However, unfortunately, the authors did not address sufficiently what are the main advantages of this particular detection technique over previously reported ones.*Overall, the English language proved to be insufficient for publication purpose and needs to be r
7、evised. Specific care should be taken with regards to prepositions since it can alter the meaning of a statementEditor: Unfortunately, the reviewer has recommended against publication of this work in *. In examining the reviewers specific comments, I note that some of the comments mirror those that
8、I made when the manuscript was initially submitted. In particular, the reviewer indicates that the authors have still not made a convincing case for the advantages of the proposed method over earlier techniques. Given these considerations, I must regrettably recommend rejection of this manuscript.就因
9、为没有用心写出文章的优点来，就这样被毙掉了，感到非常痛心，教训深刻！接下来，我又挑选了一个杂志，我自认为应该很容易中，因为我在那个杂志上看到有类似的文章，且我自认为内容还不如我的好可是两本杂志属于不同的出版集团，引用文献的格式完全不同，又痛苦的花了一个晚上把文献格式改了过来，这种工作就和做针线活差不多，睁着眼睛在看，你不能急，一急就郁闷的不得了于是乎，又是一翻上传的痛苦经历，可是，不到两天，不幸又降临了，居然认为我的稿件不适合该杂志，说白了，就是不想要嘛Dear Dr*,I am writing to you on behalf of Editor *.We regret to inform
10、you that * is unable to accept your manuscript *, Manuscript No. ABC-00938-2007 for publication in *.In view of the limited number of pages available to us each year to cover the entire field of analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, its instrumental advances and its wide range of applications, we
11、can only publish a selection of the papers submitted to our journal.We are sorry not to be able to send you better news.这个时候，什么情绪都有了，有时候想，是不是自己的工作还没有够的上档次？是不是文章真的写的很差，因为还没有接收过论文，所以这个时候的自信心真的是非常的差，后来干脆把文章晾在了一边心情平静下来了又想，花了这么多心思做的东西，是不可能放弃的，况且当初在选这个题目的时候就认为这个工作还是有一定意思和意义的于是，我根据之前审稿人的意思，又补充了一些实验，在写作上也丰富
12、了一些过了一个多月，我又开始了新的冲击这一次，显然，努力得到回报了Dear professor *, We have received expert review of your manuscript. You will see that revision of your manuscript is advised, and suggestions are offered for improving the manuscript and its impact. If you are prepared to undertake the work required, I would be plea
13、sed to consider the paper for publication in Talanta. For your guidance, reviewers comments are appended below.Reviewers comments: Overall, this is a paper that deserves to be published, but requires revision.(有这一句就够了，当时心情超好，无法形容）象下面这样的意见，也是非常中肯的，感谢审稿人，感谢编辑，感谢！General comments: The English used in t
14、his paper requires major revision. I do not underestimate the challengeof writing a scientific paper in a language that is not the native tongue. However, the science is currently being complicated by the grammar of the paper. In particular, single/plural conflicts and changes of (and inappropriate
15、use of) tenses (see especially section 2.5 where the middle third of the text switches to the present tense). Improving the paper in this way would ensure that the reader can focus upon the science1. The discussions throughout the manuscript is superficial, thus thorough and comprehensive discussions are required in the section of Results and Discussion. 2. Conclusion should not be a duplication of the Abstract.当然，也提出了其他的不少意见，这次我可是对待的相当认真，其中有一条审稿意见我不太明白，为此我在某专业论文上发贴和别人讨论了一个多星期修改了个把月，上传，第三天，刷
