2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61

上传人:鲁** 文档编号:513645955 上传时间:2023-09-10 格式:DOCX 页数:71 大小:79.71KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61_第1页
第1页 / 共71页
2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61_第2页
第2页 / 共71页
2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61_第3页
第3页 / 共71页
2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61_第4页
第4页 / 共71页
2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61_第5页
第5页 / 共71页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)套卷61(71页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-武汉大学考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷(含答案带详解)1. 不定项选择题“A HARMLESS drudge.” Of the definitions in Samuel Johnsons great English dictionary of 1755, that of “lexicographer”, his own calling, is the most famous, an example of the same wit that led him to define “oats” as “a grain, which in England is generally gi

2、ven to horses, but in Scotland supports the people”.Why name a language column after a harmless drudge? Because Johnson, despite the drudgery, knew that language was not harmless. Its power to inform and to lead astray, to entertain and to annoy, to build co-operation or destroy a reputation, makes

3、language serious stuff, The Economists “Johnson” column began in 1992 and was later revived online. This week it returns to the print edition, and henceforth will appear fortnightly.Many of the topics tackled are fun: swearing and slang, preferences and peeves. Some are more fundamental. Language re

4、veals a lot about human nature: how people reason differently in a foreign language, or to what extent different languages encode a world view, are some of the most exciting and controversial topics in linguistic research.People care intensely about their language, and so language in the wider world

5、 sometimes comes into conflict. The perceived arrogance of Castilians to Catalan threatens to sunder Spain; “language police” in Quebec tell restaurant owners to change “pasta” and “grilled cheese” pates and fromae fondant. At the extreme, the passage of a law downgrading Russian in Ukraine helps sp

6、ark war in that country ; Vladimir Putin has used it as evidence that Ukrainian nationalists are bent on wiping out Russian culture there. The war has rumbled on since, with language the most obvious symbol of wider identity and sympathy.So the Johnson column treats topics light and heavy as well as

7、 language both English and international. A language column is expected to tackle questions of right and wrong. There are roughly two views of how to do this: one top-down, based on authority, prestige, writing and stability; one bottom-up, resting on how most people actually use the language, and o

8、pen to change.The two schools of thought, known as “prescriptivism”( which sets down how the language should be) and “descriptivism” ( which tells how it is ) , have often been at daggers drawn: English teachers and some usage-book writers on one side, and academic linguists, lexicographers and othe

9、r usage-book writers on the other. In the caricature, prescriptivists are authoritarians with their heads in the sand, insisting on Victorian-era non-rules. The descriptivists are mocked as “anything-is-correct, embracing every fad, even that Shakespeare should be taught in text-message-speak.An int

10、ellectual writing for an elite audience, Samuel Johnson did not shy away from “right” and “wrong”, even “barbarity”, “depravity” and “corruption”, in matters of language. But he declared his task was not to “form” but to “register” (that is, describe) the language; trying to stop change was like try

11、ing to “ lash the wind”. Above all, his years of drudging at the dictionary had taught him humility: he knew he was sure to commit “ a few wild blunders, and visible absurdities, from which no work of such multiplicity was ever free”.Prescribing is not really the opposite of describing. Lexicographe

12、rs from Johnsons day on must describe the language, grounding their definitions in real living English. But that is in order to give stronger roots to a book they know people will use for firm guidance. Academic linguists, the arch-descriptivists, are perfectly willing to call some usages wrong and

13、others plain ugly.1.Which of the following is INCORRECT about Samuel Johnson according to the passage?2.Why is language serious stuff according to the passage?3.From Para 4, the author has listed the conflicts caused by language in the following countries EXCEPT( ) .4.Which of the following is NOT M

14、ENTIONED in the passage?问题1选项A.Samuel Johnson once compiled a great English dictionary.B.Samuel Johnson defined oats as a grain which is generally given to horses in England but supports the people in Scotland.C.Samuel Johnson defined lexicographer as a harmless drudge.D.Samuel Johnson knew that lan

15、guage was harmless.问题2选项A.It has power to inform and to lead astray.B.It has power to entertain and to annoy.C.It has power to build cooperation or destroy a reputation.D.All of the above.问题3选项A.UkraineB.CanadaC.QuebecD.Spain问题4选项A.The Economists “Johnson” column begun in 1992 treats different topic

16、s in different languages.B.Both prescriptivists and descriptivists are mocked in the academic articles.C.Trying to stop change in language was like trying to “lash the wind”.D.Lexicographers from Johnsons day on must ground their definitions in real living English.【答案】第1题:D第2题:D第3题:C第4题:B【解析】第1题:1.【选项释义】1. Which of the following is INCORRECT ab

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号