2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期

上传人:人*** 文档编号:509301664 上传时间:2023-05-07 格式:DOCX 页数:29 大小:33.99KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期_第1页
第1页 / 共29页
2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期_第2页
第2页 / 共29页
2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期_第3页
第3页 / 共29页
2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期_第4页
第4页 / 共29页
2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期_第5页
第5页 / 共29页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)第95期(29页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷(附带答案与详解)1. 单选题After the Boston Marathon bombings, the process by which breaking news and information are generated and disseminated looked more ragged and exposed than ever: CNN stumbled, the New York Post painted a target on a high-school track athlete; Reddit launched

2、a failed hunt for the bombers; and the name of Sunil Tripathi, a missing Brown student, trended on Twitter for all the wrong reasons.The issue, in part, is velocity: news has never moved faster than it does now, and few events of the past several years have captured Americas attention like the Bosto

3、n bombings. Every new bit of information was instantly, indiscriminately sucked into the media vacuum. If there is a medium of this moment, it is Twitter.Twitters intrinsic, relentless driving of the new makes it the quintessential medium of breaking news, particularly combined with its capacity for

4、 spreading that news with breathtaking ease. By clicking retweet, you can re-broadcast a tweet from somebody to all of your followers. A tweet, and the information it contains, can go viral in seconds. So can misinformation, as countless celebrities killed by Twitter can attest. And the mechanics of

5、 Twitter offer only awkward partial solutions to that problem. The Wired writer Mat Honan, like many others, re-blasted a tweet referring to Sunil Tripathi as Suspect #2 in the Boston bombings. That information was gravely wrong, but, as Honan describes, there was little he could do to prevent it fr

6、om self-perpetuating:Deeply disturbed by this inability to correct viral misinformation, Honan proposes that Twitter should have a correction mechanism that allows users to edit and rebroadcast tweets after they are posted. The original tweet would remain intact within the corrected tweet, so it wou

7、ld not simply vanish into a hole; there would be accountability. This impulse to regulate the information economy of Twitter and ensure that data and news is as correct as possible is understandable. But it would ruin Twitter as we know it.For all of the ways in which Twitter has evolved since its c

8、reation, in 2006, when it was known as “twttr,” what has not changed is how profoundly Twitter relies on nowness. Nowness is not simply newness, or the new: the question Twitter used to ask of users when they went to compose a tweet, “Whats happening?” is a direct inquiry about the state of now. Twi

9、tters intense focus on immediacy has manifested in many small waysfor instance, users can only see their three thousand most recent tweets (and the service only recently added the ability for users to download their entire Twitter archive and conduct searches of tweets from the past). But, most impo

10、rtant, when a user logs into Twitter, what they see is a raw, unfiltered stream, with the newest content at the very top. Facebook, by contrast, shows users a curated feed; the top of the feed is not whats new, it is what the algorithms think is best.Twitter as a medium is so intently bound to the n

11、ow that introducing content not of this moment is disruptiveits actually something of a prank to resurface someones tweets from the distant past, either by retweeting or favoriting them. My friend and I did that to each other yesterday, retweeting a series of stuff from several months ago; they arri

12、ved in my feed and hers, ripped away from any sense of context. It felt embarrassing. (This works, though slightly less powerfully, on other social networks that utilize streams and emphasize the present.)One of the ways were learning to deal with the trade-offs inherent to real-time streams is a bu

13、rgeoning self-awareness of their potential to spread misinformation in half a heartbeat. A mechanism that purports to make that stream more accurateeven though a corrections button would not fully prevent bad information from spreading would lull us toward a more complacent, less critical view of th

14、at stream. As Nick Kallen, a former systems engineer at Twitter, writes, Were dealing with a new medium. It has some aspects of conversation, and some of broadcast, some aspects of live television, and some of (an edited) newspaper. But it is none of these things all at the same time.Twitter is now,

15、 all the time.1. Which of the following best describe the essence of Twitter according to the text?2. Honans proposition on Twitter indicates that().3. What is the main difference between Twitter and Facebook according to the text?4. Why does the author say its actually something of a prank to resur

16、face someones tweets from the distant past”?5. Which of the following best describes authors opinion?问题1选项A.Finding friends and establishing relationshipB.Spreading news relentless in the easiest wayC.Making rumor and truth trended in its timelineD.Communicating between followers and hosts问题2选项A.Misinformation can be well solved under the mechanics of Twitter.B.A better correction mechanism must be a

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号