《2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷（附带答案与详解）第91期》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷（附带答案与详解）第91期（16页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-中国传媒大学考试内容及全真模拟冲刺卷（附带答案与详解）1. 单选题It is（）that women should be paid less than men for doing the same kind of work.问题1选项A.allergicB.amateurC.annualD.absurd【答案】D【解析】考查形容词词义辨析。allergic“对极讨厌”;amateur“业余的，外行的”；annual“每年的，年度的”；absurd “荒谬的，可笑的”。根据后面提到的“做同样的工作，女性获得的报酬比男性的少”，可知这种做法是荒谬的，因此选项D符合题意。句意：做
2、同样的工作，女性获得的报酬比男性的少，这是很荒谬的。2. 单选题The young employee has a (n) （）qualityhe is totally honest.问题1选项A.respectableB.admirableC.decentD.approachable【答案】C【解析】考查形容词辨析。A选项respectable“值得尊敬的人；相当数量的”；B选项admirable“令人钦佩的；极好的；值得赞扬的”；C选项decent“正派的；得体的；相当好的”；D选项approachable“亲切友善的；易理解的；可接近的”。句意：这个年轻的雇员有一个品质他完全诚实。虽然re
3、spectable和 admirable都是褒义词，但均带有仰视的含义，而本题提及的是一个young employee具有的品质，不需要仰视，就用C选项decent修饰足以。3. 单选题An ambulance must have priority as it usually has to deal with some kind of（）.问题1选项A.crisisB.urgencyC.emergencyD.emergence【答案】C【解析】考查名词辨析。A选项想crisis“危机；危险期”；B选项urgency“紧急；催促”；C选项emergency“紧急情况；突发事件”；D选项emerg
4、ence“出现；发生；露头”。句意：救护车必须有优先权，因为它通常要处理一些。救护车需要处理的是一些紧急情况或突发事件，C选项符合句意。4. 单选题BACK in 1922，Thomas Edison predicted that “the motion picture is destined to revolutionize our educational system and.in a few years it will supplant largely, if not entirely, the use of textbooks.” Well, we all make mistakes.
5、 But at least Edison did not squander vast quantities of public money on installing cinema screens in schools around the country.With computers, the story has been different. Many governments have packed them into schools, convinced that their presence would improve the pace and efficiency of learni
6、ng. Large numbers of studies, some more academically respectable than others, have purported to show that computers help children to learn. Now, however, a study that compares classes with computers against similar classes without them casts doubt on that view.In the current Economic Journal, Joshua
7、 Angrist of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Victor Lavy of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem look at a scheme which put computers into many of Israels primary and middle schools in the mid-1990s. Dr. Angrist and Dr. Lavy compare the test scores for maths and Hebrew achieved by childre
8、n in the fourth and eighth grades (i.e., aged about nine and 13) in schools with and without computers. They also asked the classes teachers how they used various teaching materials, such as Xeroxed worksheets and, of course, computer programs. The researchers found that the Israeli scheme had much
9、less effect on teaching methods in middle schools than in elementary schools. It also found no evidence that the use of computers improved childrens test scores. In fact, it found the reverse. In the case of the math scores of fourth-graders, there was a consistently negative relationship between co
10、mputer use and test scores. The authors offer three possible explanations of why this might be. First, the introduction of computers into classrooms might have gobbled up cash that would otherwise have paid for other aspects of education. But that is unlikely in this case since the money for the pro
11、grammer came from the national lottery, and the study found no significant change in teaching resources, methods or training in schools that acquired computers through the scheme.A second possibility is that the transition to using computers in instruction takes time to have an effect. Maybe, say th
12、e authors, but the schools surveyed had been using the schemes computers for a full school year. That was enough for the new computers to have had a large (and apparently malign) influence on fourth-grade maths scores. The third explanation is the simplest: that the use of computers in teaching is n
13、o better (and perhaps worse) than other teaching methods.The bottom line says Dr Angrist, is that the costs are clear-cut and the benefits are murky.” The burden of proof now lies with the promoters of classroom computers. And the only reliable way to make their case is, surely, to conduct a proper
14、study, with children randomly allocated to teachers who use computers and teachers who use other methods, including the cheapest of all: chalk and talk.1. We can learn from the first paragraph that （）.2. Dr. Angrist and Dr. Lavy have done the following except （）.3. According to Dr. Angrist and Dr. L
15、avy, in the Israeli scheme, students didnt make improvement in their test scores because （）.4. It can be inferred from the last paragraph that （）.5. The authors attitude towards governments packing computers in schools seems to be （）问题1选项A.motion picture has revolutionized education systemB.Edisons prediction has been proved wrongC.Edison encouraged schools to install cinema screensD.schools are cautious about Edisons idea问题2选项A.comparing the test scores of students in different age groupsB.interviewing teachers about their teaching methodsC.launching the computer prog
