《2022年考博英语-复旦大学考前模拟强化练习题92（附答案详解）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-复旦大学考前模拟强化练习题92（附答案详解）（18页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-复旦大学考前模拟强化练习题（附答案详解）1. 单选题（ ） down than the telephone rang.问题1选项A.Not until I layB.No sooner had I lainC.Hardly had I lainD.Scarcely did I lie【答案】B【解析】考查倒装句。lie “躺；位于”，其过去式、过去分词、现在分词分别是：lay, lain, lying； lay “放，搁，下蛋”，其过去式、过去分词、现在分词分别是：laid, laid, laying。句意：我刚躺下，电话就响了。No sonnerthan为固定句式，且前半
2、句需要部分倒装，所以选项B符合题意。2. 单选题I can（ ）the house being untidy，but I hate it if its not clean.问题1选项A.put in forB.put up withC.put downD.put across【答案】B【解析】考查动词词组辨析。put in for“申请”；put up with“容忍，忍受”；put down“记下，放下”；put across“圆满完成，使被接受”。句意：我可以忍受房子不整洁，但是我讨厌房子不干净。选项B符合题意。3. 写作题Directions: Write a composition o
3、f about 200 words on the following topic. Remember to write your composition on ANSWER SHEET II.“My Views about Ambition Makes a Man”【答案】略4. 单选题Legislation has been developed throughout the 20th century attempting to protect employees from（ ）dismissal by their employers.问题1选项A.unrecognizableB.undeni
4、ableC.unreachableD.unjustifiable【答案】D【解析】考查形容词词义辨析。unrecognizable“未被承认的，无法认出的”；deniable“不可否认的，无可争辩的”；unreachable“不能得到的；不能到达的”；unjustifiable“不合道理的；不能分辨的”。句意：发展贯穿整个20世纪的法律是为了保护员工，让他们不再被雇主无理由解雇。选项D符合题意。5. 单选题Although the false banknotes fooled many people, they did not（ ）to a close examination.问题1选项A.k
5、eep upB.put upC.stand upD.look up【答案】C【解析】考查动词词组辨析。keep up“保持，继续”；put up“举起，抬起”；stand up“坚持，经得起”；look up“查询，拜访”。句意：尽管假钞欺骗了很多人，但是它们经不住仔细检查。选项C符合题意。6. 翻译题由小学到中学，所修习的无非是一些普通的基本知识。就是大学四年，所授课业也还是相当粗浅的学识。世人常称大学为“最高学府”，这名称易滋误解，好像过此以上即无学问可言。 大学的研究所才是初步研究学问的所在，在这里做学问也只能算是粗涉藩篱，注重的是研究学问的方法与实习。学无止境，一生的时间都嫌太短，所以
6、古人皓首穷经，头发白了还是在继续研究，不过在这样的研究中确实有浓厚的趣味。 Put the following passage into English.【答案】We learn nothing more than some basically common knowledge from primary to secondary school. Even if during four-year university life, we were taught only rudiments of scholarship. Universities are usually known as “the
7、 highest educational institution”, which is likely to cause the misunderstanding that there is no more to learn after university. The research institutes of universities are the certain places where knowledge is primarily studied. But even there you get only the first tasting of learning where focus
8、 on research method and practice. Knowledge is infinite and life is limited. Thus, ancient people never stop their study even when they were very old. However, there was strong interest in this process. 【解析】7. 单选题His（ ）thighs were barely strong enough to support the weight of his body.问题1选项A.inanima
9、teB.rusticC.malleableD.shrunken【答案】A【解析】考查形容词词义辨析。inanimate“死气沉沉的，无生气的，单调的”；rustic“乡村的”；malleable“有延展性的，可锻的，可塑的”；shrunken“缩小的”。句意：他那毫无生气的大腿还不足以强壮到支撑他的身体。选项A符合题意。8. 单选题On January, 11th, 2009, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Suprem
10、e Court. Perry v. Schwarzenegger challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California referendum that, in November, 2008, overturned a State Supreme Court decision allowing same-sex couples to marry. Its lead lawyers are unlikely allies: Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general u
11、nder President George W. Bush, and a prominent conservative; and David Boies, the Democratic trial lawyer who was his opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore. The two are mounting an ambitious case that pointedly circumvents the incremental, narrowly crafted legal gambits and the careful state-by-state str
12、ategy that leading gay-rights organizations have championed in the fight for marriage equality. The Olson Boies team hopes for a ruling that will transform the legal and social landscape nationwide, something on the order of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, or Loving v. Virginia the landmark 196
13、7 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.Olsons interest in this case has puzzled quite a few people. Whats in it for him? Is he sincere? Does he really think he can sway the current Course? But when I spoke with Olson, who is sixty-nine, in early December, he so
14、unded confident and impassioned; the case clearly fascinated him both as an intellectual challenge and as a way to make history. “The loving case was forty-two years ago.” he said, perched on the edge of his chair in the law offices of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Washington DC, where he is a partner,
15、 “Its inconceivable to us there days to say that a couple of a different racial background cant get married.” Olson wore a brightly striped shirt and a paisley tie, without a jacket; there was something folksy in his speech,which reminded me that hes a Westerner, who grew up and was educated in Northern California. He said, “Separate is not equal. Civil unions and domestic partnerships are not the same as marriage. Were not inventing any new right, or creating a new right, or asking the courts to recogni
