《2022年考博英语-通用考博英语考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷89（附答案带详解）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2022年考博英语-通用考博英语考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷89（附答案带详解）（35页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、2022年考博英语-通用考博英语考试题库及全真模拟冲刺卷（附答案带详解）1. 单选题Questions 1 to 4 are based on the conversation you have just heard.问题1选项A.Her house has not been repaired in time.B.She has failed to reach the manager again.C.Her claim has been completely disregarded.D.She has not received any letter from the man.问题2选项A.Th
2、e ground floor of their cottage was flooded.B.Their caravan was washed away by the flood.C.Their entire house was destroyed by the flood.D.The roof of their cottage collapsed in the flood.问题3选项A.The womans misreading of the insurance companys letter.B.The womans ignorance of the insurance companys p
3、olicy.C.The womans inaccurate description of the whole incident.D.The womans failure to pay her house insurance in time.问题4选项A.File a lawsuit against the insurance company.B.Talk to the manager of Safe House Insurance.C.Consult her lawyer about the insurance policy.D.Revise the terms and conditions
4、of the contract.【答案】第1题:C第2题:A第3题:D第4题:A【解析】Conversation OneM: Good morning, Safe House Insurance. My name is Paul. How can I help you today?W: Morning. I wouldnt say that its good from where I am standing. This is Miss Wilson, and this is the third time Ive called this week since receiving your let
5、ter about our insurance claim. 1 Im getting a little fed up with my calls about my claim being completely disregarded.M: Miss Wilson, thank you for calling back. Can I take some details to help me look at your claim?W: Its Miss May Wilson of 15 South Sea Road in Cornwall, and the details are that ou
6、r village was extensively flooded two months ago. 2 The entire ground floor of our cottage was submerged in water, and five of us have been living in a caravan ever since. You people are still withholding the money we are entitled to over a bizarre technical detail, and its not acceptable, Paul!M: M
7、iss Wilson, according to the notes on your account, 3 the bizarre technical detail that you mentioned refers to the fact that you hadnt paid house insurance the month before the incident.W: That money left our account. And now that you should be paying out, you are suddenly saying that you didnt rec
8、eive it on time. Im really skeptical about this claim.M: The contract does say that any missed payment in a year will affect the terms and conditions of the insurance contract and may affect claims. Of course, I can pass you on to my manager to talk to you more about this.W: Ive already spoken to hi
9、m and you can tell him Im furious now and that 4 your company has a lawsuit on its hands. You will be hearing from my lawyer. Goodbye.1. What is the woman complaining about?【试题答案】C【试题解析】题目问女士在抱怨什么？对话开头，女士提到，这是她本周第三次给这家保险公司打电话了，令她有些无法忍受的是，她的索赔诉求完全被忽视了，C选项“她的诉求完全被忽视了”是对录音原文的转述，因此正确。A选项“她的房子未能及时得到修缮”，根
10、据录音可知，女士向保险公司索赔的是金钱，而不是要请人来帮她修缮房子，所以A选项不正确；B选项“她又没能联系到经理”，录音中女士明确说到，她已经和经理谈过了，因此B选项不正确；D选项“她没有收到过男士的来信”表述错误，在对话开头，女士就说她收到了男士寄给她的关于索赔的信件（receiving your letter about our insurance claim）。2. What is the problem the womans family encountered?【试题答案】A【试题解析】题目问女士一家遇到了什么问题？女士说，由于两个月前村里发洪水，她家房子的底层全部进水了。A选项“他
11、们房屋的底层被水淹没了”中flooded是对录音原文submerged in water的同义复述，因此A选项正确。B选项“他们的大篷车被洪水冲走了”，录音说的是女士一家由于房子被淹，现在住在大篷车里，所以车并没有被洪水冲走，因此B选项不正确；C选项“他们的整栋房子都被洪水冲毁了”，主要错在entire以及destroy上面，录音表述的是房子的ground floor（底层）被淹没了，并不是整个房屋被冲毁了，所以C选项也不正确；D选项“他们房屋的屋顶在洪水中倒塌了”在录音中并未被提及，因此排除。3. What has caused the so-called “bizarre technica
12、l detail”, according to the man?【试题答案】D【试题解析】题目问根据男士所说的，是什么原因导致了所谓的“奇怪的技术细节”？录音中男士表示，女士所不理解的“奇怪的技术细节”事实上是因为她在事故发生前的一个月没有缴纳房屋保险费用，D选项“女士未能及时缴纳房屋保险费用”与录音原文意思一致，因此正确。A选项“女士对保险公司寄来的信件内容有所误解”；B选项“女士对保险公司的保单内容一无所知”和C选项“女士对整个事故的描述不准确”均不正确，因此排除。4. What does the woman say she would do at the end of the conve
13、rsation?【试题答案】A【试题解析】题目问女士在对话结束时说她会采取什么行动？录音最后女士提及她非常生气，并表示保险公司将会面临一场官司（your company has a lawsuit on its hands）。由此可知，女士要起诉保险公司，因此A选项“对保险公司提起诉讼”正确。B选项“和保险公司的经理谈谈”是已经发生的事情，因此排除；C选项“向她的律师咨询关于保单的问题”和D选项“修改合同条款”在录音中均未提及，因此排除。2. 单选题Defenders of special protective labor legislation for women often maintai
14、n that eliminating such laws would destroy the fruits of a century-long struggle for the protection of women works. Even a brief examination of the historic practice of courts and employers would show that the fruit of such laws has been bitter: they are, in practice, more of a curse than a blessing
15、.Sex-defined protective laws have often been based on stereotypical assumptions concerning womens needs and abilities, and employers have frequently used them as legal excuses for discriminating against women. After the Second World War, for example, businesses and government sought to persuade wome
16、n to vacate jobs in factories, thus making room in the labor force for returning veterans. The revival or passage of state laws limiting the daily or weekly work hours of women conveniently accomplished this. Employers had only to declare that overtime hours were a necessary condition of employment o
