2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期

上传人:cl****1 文档编号:487844803 上传时间:2022-07-13 格式:DOCX 页数:26 大小:28.73KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期_第1页
第1页 / 共26页
2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期_第2页
第2页 / 共26页
2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期_第3页
第3页 / 共26页
2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期_第4页
第4页 / 共26页
2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期_第5页
第5页 / 共26页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)第186期(26页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-同济大学考前拔高综合测试题(含答案带详解)1. 单选题After four years in the same job his enthusiasm finally ( ).问题1选项A.deterioratedB.dispersedC.dissipatedD.drained【答案】D【解析】动词词义辨析。Deteriorated“恶化”;dispersed“散开,驱散”;dissipated “驱散,消散”;drained “使流干”。句意:四年后,对于同一份工作,他的热情最终逐渐消失了。选项D符合题意。2. 单选题Mutual respect for territori

2、al _ is one of the bases upon which our two countries develop relationships.问题1选项A.unityB.integrityC.entirelyD.reliability【答案】B【解析】名词词义辨析。unity“统一”;integrity “完整,正直”; entirely “完全地”;reliability“可靠性”。句意:对领土完整的相互尊重是两国关系发展的基础之一。选项B符合题意。3. 单选题The University in Transformation, edited by Australian futuri

3、sts Sohail Inayatullah and Jennifer Gidley, presents some 20 highly varied outlooks on tomorrows universities by writers representing both Western and non-Western perspectives. Their essays raise a broad range of issues, questioning nearly every key assumption we have about higher education today.Th

4、e most widely discussed alternative to the traditional campus is the Internet Universitya voluntary community to scholars and teachers physically scattered throughout a country or around the world but all linked in cyberspace. A computerized university could have many advantages, such as easy schedu

5、ling, efficient delivery of lectures to thousands or even millions of students at once, and ready access for students everywhere to the resources of all the worlds great libraries.Yet the Internet University poses dangers, too. For example, a line of franchised courseware,produced by a few superstar

6、 teachers,marketed under the brand name of a famous institution, and heavily advertised, might eventually come to dominate the global education market, warns sociology professor Peter Manicas of the University of Hawaii at Manoa. Besides enforcing a rigidly standardized curriculum, such a “college e

7、ducation in a box” could undersell the offerings of many traditional brick and mortar institutions, effectively driving them out of business and throwing thousands of career academics out of work, note Australian communications professors David Rooney and Greg Hearn.On the other hand, while global c

8、onnectivity seems highly likely to play some significant role in future higher education,that does not mean greater uniformity in course contentor other dangers will necessarily follow. Counter-movements are also at work.Many in academia, including scholars contributing to this volume, are questioni

9、ng the fundamental mission of university education. What if, for instance, instead of receiving primarily technical training and building their individual careers, university students and professors could focus their learning and research efforts on existing problems in their local communities and t

10、he world? Feminist scholar Ivana Milojevic dares to dream what a university might become “if we believed that child-care workers and teachers in early childhood education should be one of the highest (rather than lowest) paid professionals?”Co-editor Jennifer Gidley shows how tomorrows university fa

11、culty, instead of giving lectures and conducting independent research, may take on three new roles. Some would act as brokers, assembling customized degree-credit programmes for individual students by mixing and matching the best course offerings available from institutions all around the world. A s

12、econd group, mentors, would function much like todays faculty advisers, but are likely to be working with many more students outside their own academic specialty. This would require them to constantly be learning from their students as well as instructing them.A third new role for faculty, and in Gi

13、dley s view the most challenging and rewarding of all, would be as meaning-makers: charismatic sages and practitioners leading groups of students colleagues in collaborative efforts to find spiritual as well as rational and technological solutions to specific real-world problems.Moreover, there seem

14、s little reason to suppose that any one form of university must necessarily drive out all other options. Students may be “enrolled” in courses offered at virtual campuses on the Internet, betweenor even duringsessions at a real world problem focused institution.As co-editor Sohail Inayatullah points

15、 out in his introduction, no future is inevitable, and the very act of imagining and thinking through alternative possibilities can directly affect how thoughtfully, creatively and urgently even a dominant technology is adapted and applied. Even in academia, the future belongs to those who care enou

16、gh to work their visions into practical, sustainable realities.1.When the book reviewer discusses the Internet University, _.2.Which of the following is NOT seen as a potential danger of the Internet University?3.According to the review,what is the fundamental mission of traditional university education?4.Judging from the three new roles

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号