2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)

上传人:大米 文档编号:486167021 上传时间:2024-01-12 格式:DOCX 页数:18 大小:20.98KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)_第1页
第1页 / 共18页
2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)_第2页
第2页 / 共18页
2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)_第3页
第3页 / 共18页
2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)_第4页
第4页 / 共18页
2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)_第5页
第5页 / 共18页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题13(附答案详解)(18页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、2022年考博英语-浙江工商大学考前模拟强化练习题(附答案详解)1. 单选题A: What are in the ladys suitcase are smuggled cigarettes.B:( ) .问题1选项A.Such are the ones in her husbands suitcase.B.Such the ones in her husbands suitcase are.C.So the ones in her husbands suitcase are.D.So are the ones in her husbands suitcase.【答案】D【解析】【试题解析】考

2、查语法结构。这里考查so+系动词(助动词或情态动词)+另一主语。属于主谓倒装结构,表示前句所述情况,也同样适用于第二句的主语。意思是“他丈夫的手提箱里的也是”。so意思是“也如此,也这样”,句意为:女士手提箱中是走私香烟。他丈夫手提箱里的也是。正确答案选D。2. 单选题He uses color, light and form quite differently from the conventional style of his( ) .问题1选项A.descendantsB.predecessorsC.successorsD.ancestors【答案】B【解析】【试题解析】考查名词辨析。A

3、选项descendant“子孙,后裔”;B选项predecessor“前任,前辈”;C选项successor“后继者,继承人”;D选项ancestor“祖宗,祖先”,分析空格前后的句子成分,是一个所有格短语,充当介词from的宾语,意思可以理解为“前辈的传统表达方式”,句意为:他在色彩、光线和形式方面,做法完全不同于他前辈的传统方式。故正确答案选B。3. 单选题To survive in the intense market competition, we must ( )the qualities and varieties of products we make to the world-

4、market demand.问题1选项A.improveB.gearC.guaranteeD.enhance【答案】B【解析】【试题解析】考查动词辨析。A选项improve“提高,改善”;B选项gear“适合;配合”;C选项guarantee“保证,担保”;D选项enhance“加强,提高”。gear to有“使适合,配合”的意思。根据句子空格前后分析,这里需要填入一个动词,根据题干前面的句意是“to survive in the intense market competition要在激烈的市场竞争中求生存”,结合后面的关键词“qualities and varieties of produ

5、cts商品的质量和数量”,可知B选项“适合,配合”符合语境,句意:为了在激烈的市场竞争中生存下来,我们必须调整产品的质量及品种以适应国际市场的需求。选项B正确。4. 单选题 When executives at Google went looking for Wall Street investment bankers to underwrite the companys massive initial public offering, they laid down strict terms of engagement: bring us new ideas on how to sell th

6、e deal to investors and save the usual political gamesmanship. But with such a huge payday at stakean estimated $100 million in fees for handling the offeringwould you expect all the big firms to play by the Google rules? Of course not, just ask Goldman Sachs. To win a chunk of the Google business,

7、Goldman, the nations premier investment bank, set free its CEO: Hank Paulson, to pull some strings. Paulson is one of Wall Streets best “call men”, who can wave a Palm PDA full of connections when its crunch time to bring home a deal. But Newsweek has learned that Paulson tried to sidestep Googles o

8、rders by reaching out to one of Googles largest investors, Kleiner Perkins, the powerful venture-capital firm that was an early Google backer. The move helped doom Goldmans efforts to win the lead underwriting spot, which went instead to Credit Suisse First Boston and Morgan Stanley. Paulson thought

9、 his best shot was John Doerr, one of Kleiners top partners. Bad move, when word of Paulsons misstep got back to Googles top executives, Goldman was quickly bumped from the top of the short list. “The people at Google were such enthusiasts about the rules,” said one executive who works at a rival Wa

10、ll Street firm. “When they heard about this, they went ape.” None of the parties involvedGoogle, Goldman Sachs or Doerrwould comment. The two winners, CSFB and Morgan Stanley, managed to keep a low profile. John Mack, CSFBs famously well-connected chief executive, purposely stayed out of the bidding

11、 process for fear that he might tip the scales to another player, people with knowledge of the matter say. Meanwhile, new rules for Wall Street research analysts appear to have prevented Mary Meeker, Morgan Stanleys top Internet analyst, from playing a direct role, even though she and Doerr have don

12、e business together for years. Goldman, meanwhile, cant blame its loss just on Paulson. People close to the deal say bankers for the firm bragged to Google about the Goldman name, and didnt generate enough ideas about how to sell shares to investors through an auction. “Their lack of marketing wit m

13、ay have hurt them more than Paulson,” said the executive from a rival firm. Sometimes, it really does pay to play by the rules.1. What can be inferred from the first paragraph?2. Hank Paulsons name is mentioned to show that( ).3. The speaker in the third paragraph thinks that( ).4. John Mack and Mar

14、y Meeker shared similarities in that they both( ).5. Goldman might learn a lesson from Googles deal that ( ).问题1选项A.Google followed the rules of Wall Street.B.Goldman Sachs disobeyed Googles rules.C.Goldman Sachs followed Googles rules.D.Big firms in Wall Street are afraid of Google.问题2选项A.he is a f

15、amous banker in Wall StreetB.he failed by following Googles rulesC.he lost Googles deal by using gamesmanshipD.he lost Googles deal to his rivals问题3选项A.John Doerr was the best shot for PaulsonB.Goldman was wrong in Googles dealC.Google made a fuss about Paulsons actD.Google followed the rules perfectly问题4选项A.behaved with deliberate restraint or modestyB.purposely stayed out of the bidding processC.worked together with Doerr for yearsD.tipped the scale to their rivals问题5选项A.the

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 习题/试题

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号