《【考研英语】2021年3月北京科技大学研究生招生考试英语练习题100道（附答案解析）》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《【考研英语】2021年3月北京科技大学研究生招生考试英语练习题100道（附答案解析）（70页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、全文可编辑word文档 页眉与背景水印可删除【考研英语】2021年3月北京科技大学研究生招生考试英语练习题100道（附答案解析）第1题【单选题】It shall be subject to ratification or acceptance by the signatory States. A、本公约须以签字国批准或接受为条件。 B、本公约须以签字国批准或接受为生效条件。 C、本公约须经签字国批准或接受。 D、本公约的生效取决于签字国的批准或接受。【正确答案】C【答案解析】be subject to表示“受支配，从属于”的意思。第2题【单选题】Cheese is really a good
2、lure for mice. A、许可，准许 B、诱惑 C、要求，渴望 D、焦点【正确答案】B【答案解析】lure n. 诱惑；饵；诱惑物。第3题【单选题】People suspected that “Lucky”, as he was called by friends, wanted to kill his wife he no longer lived with. They say that Lucan entered his old house and in the dark, killed the nanny by mistake. His estranged wife heard
3、noises, came downstairs and was also attacked, but managed to escape. Seven months after the murder, a jury concluded that Lucan had killed the nanny.It is thought that Lucan killed the nanny because_. A、she was looking after the children B、she was a friend of Lucans C、it was dark and he thought she
4、 was Lady Lucan D、Loard Lucan thought the nanny stole his car【正确答案】C【答案解析】答案选C。因果关系题。对照本段People suspected that“Lucky”，as he was called by friends, wanted to kill his wife he no longer lived with. They say that Lucan entered his old house and in the dark，killed the nanny by mistake.本来是要杀他的妻子，可是因为天太黑，
5、所以错杀了保姆。第4题【单选题】 Did you ask the guard _ happened? Yes, he told me all _ he knew. A、what； that B、what； what C、which； which D、that； that【正确答案】A【答案解析】what happened是宾语从句. all 之后that he knew是定语从句.先行词是all,所以关系代词只能用that。第5题【单选题】Who did the teacher have _ an article for the wall newspaper just now? A、writt
6、en B、writing C、write D、to write【正确答案】C【答案解析】此处所用句型为have sb. do sth. 不妨把who换为Tom，利用还原句子结构的方法变为肯定句：The teacher had Tom write an article for the wall newspaper just now. 因此，答案应选C。第6题阅读理解Over the past decade, thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods. A received one for
7、 its “one-click” online payment system. Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy. One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.Now the nations top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents, which have been controversial ever sinc
8、e they were first authorized 10 years ago. In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz, the U.S. court of Appeals for the federal circuit said it would use a particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents. In re Bilski, as the case is known, is “a very big deal”, say
9、s Dennis D. Crouch of the University of Missouri School of law. It “has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents.”Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face, because it was the Federal Circuit itself that introduced such patents with is 1998 decision in the so-called
10、 State Street Bank case, approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets. That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings, initially by emerging internet companies trying to stake out exclusive rights to specific types of online transactions. Later, move established com
11、panies raced to add such patents to their files, if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch. In 2005, IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents, despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them. Si
12、milarly, some Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products, even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market. The Federal circuit issued an unusual order s
13、tating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the courts judges, rather than a typical panel of three, and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should “reconsider” its state street Bank ruling.The Federal Circuits action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the suprem
14、e Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders. Last April, for example, the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for “inventions” that are obvious. The judges on the Federal Circuit are “reacting to the anti-patent trend at the Supreme Court”, says Harold
15、 C. Wegner, a patent attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. A、their limited value to business B、their connection with asset allocation C、the possible restriction on their granting D、the controversy over authorization【正确答案】C【答案解析】同义替换。possible= potential，eliminate= restriction。 A、Its ruling complies with the court decisions. B、It involves a very big business transaction. C、It has been dismissed by the Federal Circuit. D、It may change the legal practices in the U.S.【正确答案】D【答案解析】potential= may, change 对应着第一段和第二段之间的转折。从本段的review，eliminate也可以
