系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析

上传人:I*** 文档编号:228142154 上传时间:2021-12-22 格式:DOCX 页数:3 大小:62.49KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析_第1页
第1页 / 共3页
系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析_第2页
第2页 / 共3页
系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析_第3页
第3页 / 共3页
亲,该文档总共3页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析(3页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、 系统化呼吸护理在肺癌手术患者中的临床效果分析 李梅 俞洁摘要 目的 研究肺癌手术患者实施系统化呼吸护理的临床效果。方法 随机选择100例该院所收治的肺癌手术患者,2018年10月2019年10月作为该研究的时间范围,采用抽签法将其分为实验组与参照组,各为50例。其中参照组护理措施是围术期常规护理,实验组干预方法为系统化呼吸护理,对比两组患者围术期指标。结果 实验组动脉血氧分压(93.362.09)mmHg、肺活量(3.370.52)L、第一秒呼气容积(2.460.31)L、引流量(154.1921.45)mL、引流时长(2.060.34)d、住院时长(9.191.56)d;参照组分别为(82

2、.453.74)mmHg、(2.410.56)L、(1.080.39)L、(269.5432.68)mL、(3.950.80)d、(12.342.58)d(t=18.006、8.883、19.587、20.866、15.374、7.388,P=0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000、0.000)。实验组动脉血氧分压、肺活量、第一秒呼气容积高于参照组,较之于参照组,实验组引流时长、住院时长较短、引流量较少,组间差异有统计学意义(P关键词 肺癌;手术;系统化护理护理Abstract Objective To study the clinical effect of system

3、ic breathing nursing in patients with lung cancer surgery. Methods a total of 100 patients with lung cancer surgery treated in the hospital were random selected. From October 2018 to October 2019 as the time range of this study, they were divided into the experimental group and the reference group b

4、y lot method, each with 50 cases. Among them, the nursing measures of the reference group were perioperative routine nursing, and the intervention method of the experimental group was systemic respiratory nursing. The perioperative indexes of the two groups were compared. Results The arterial blood

5、oxygen partial pressure (93.362.09) mmHg, vital capacity (3.370.52) L, expiration volume (2.460.31)L, drainage volume (154.1921.45) mL, and drainage duration (2.060.34) d, length of hospital stay (9.191.56)d; the reference group was (82.453.74) mmHg, (2.410.56) L, (1.080.39) L, (269.5432.68) mL, (3.

6、950.80)d,(12.342.58)d(t=18.006, 8.883, 19.587, 20.866, 15.374, 7.388, P=0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000). The arterial oxygen pressure, vital capacity, and expiratory volume in the first second of the experimental group were higher than those of the reference group. Compared with the reference group, the experimental group had a shorter drainage time, shorter hospital stay, and less drainage volume. There were significant differences between the groups(P

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 办公文档 > 调研报告

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号