《如何回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《如何回复英文论文编辑部的修改意见（9页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、望对大家有帮助1.Dear Prof. XXXX,Thank you very much for your letter and the comments from the referees about our paper submitted to XXXX (MS Number XXXX).We have checked the manuscript and revised it according to the comments. We submit here the revised manuscript as well as a list of changes.If you have a
2、ny question about this paper, please dont hesitate to let me know.Sincerely yours,Dr. XXXXResponse to Reviewer 1:Thanks for your comments on our paper. We have revised our paper according to your comments:1. XXXXXXX2. XXXXXXX2.Dear Professor *,Re: An * Rotating Rigid-flexible Coupled System (No.: JS
3、V-D-06-*)by *Many thanks for your email of 24 Jun 2006, regarding the revision and advice of the above paper in JSV. Overall the comments have been fair, encouraging and constructive. We have learned much from it.After carefully studying the reviewer comments and your advice, we have made correspond
4、ing changes to the paper. Our response of the comments is enclosed.If you need any other information, please contact me immediately by email. My email account is *, and Tel.is *, and Fax is +*.Yours sincerely,Detailed response to reviewers comments and Asian Editors adviceOverall the comments have b
5、een fair, encouraging and constructive. We have learned much from it. Although the reviewers comments are generally positive, we have carefully proofread the manuscript and edit it as following.(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) Besides the above changes, we have corrected some expression errors.Thank you very much
6、 for the excellent and professional revision of our manuscript.3.The manuscript is revised submission () with new line and page numbers in the text, some grammar and spelling errors had also been corrected. Furthermore, the relevant regulations had been made in the original manuscript according to t
7、he comments of reviewers, and the major revised portions were marked in red bold. We also responded point by point to each reviewer comments as listed below, along with a clear indication of the location of the revision.Hope these will make it more acceptable for publication.List of Major Changes:1)
8、.2).3).Response to Reviewers:1).2).3).Response to Reviewer XXWe very much appreciate the careful reading of our manuscript and valuable suggestions of the reviewer. We have carefully considered the comments and have revised the manuscript accordingly. The comments can be summarized as follows:1) XX2
9、) XXDetailed responses1) XX2) XX4.Dear editor XXWe have received the comments on our manuscript entitled “XX” by XX. According to the comments of the reviewers, we have revised our manuscript. The revised manuscript and the detailed responses to the comments of the one reviewer are attached.Sincerel
10、y yours,XX5.Response to Reviewer AReviewer A very kindly contacted me directly, and revealed himself to be Professor Dr. Hans-Georg Geissler of the University of Leipzig. I wrote him a general response to both reviews in January 2000, followed by these responses to specific points, both his own, and
11、 those of the other reviewer .Response to Specific PointsWhat follows is a brief and cursory discussion of the various issues raised by yourself and the other reviewer. If you should revise your judgment of the validity of the theory, these points will be addressed at greater length in a new version
12、 of the paper that I would resubmit to Psychological Review.Response to Specific Points- Reviewer A:In part (1) of your critique the major complaint is that no theory is presented, which was discussed above. You continue Regrettably, not much attention is drawn to specific differences between the ch
13、osen examples that would be necessary to pinpoint specificities of perception more precisely, and if perceptual systems, as suggested, hler (Kindeed act on the basis of HR, there must be many more specific constraints involved to ensure special veridicality properties of the perceptual outcome, and
14、the difficult analytic problems of concrete modeling of perception are not even touched. The model as presented is not a model of vision or audition or any other particular modality, but is a general model to confront the alternative neural receptive field paradigm, although examples from visual per
15、ception are used to exemplify the principles discussed. The more specific visual model was submitted elsewhere, in the Orientational Harmonic model, where I showed how harmonic resonance accounts for specific visual illusory effects. As discussed above, the attempt here is to propose a general principle of neurocomputation, rather than a specific model of visual, auditory, or any other specific sensory modality. Again, what I am proposing is a paradigm rather than a theory, i.e. an alternative pri
