《《高老头》对话模式研究》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《《高老头》对话模式研究（2页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、论文标题:高老头对话模式研究Research on Dialogue Mode of Le P(?)re Goriot论文作者 吴秀梅论文导师 刘建军,论文学位 硕士,论文专业 文艺学论文单位 东北师范大学,点击次数 34,论文页数 42页File Size2390k2005-05-01论文网http:/ 对话;对话关系;对话模式;高老头Dialogue; dialogue relationship; Dialogue mode; Le Pere Goriot高老头是巴尔扎克的代表作,在人间喜剧中占有突出地位,充分展现了巴尔扎克丰富的艺术实践经验和创作成就。以往对高老头的研究大多局限于传统批评
2、,特别是社会历史批评的范围内,如对“人物再现技巧”、真实细致的环境描写、典型人物形象的塑造、“启蒙”语言的成功运用以及深刻的社会意义等的研究。即使用现代批评方法进行分析,也未能完全摆脱传统分析的惯性,恰切展示其全方位的多层次的深刻内涵。这对于高老头这样一部具有世界声誉的作品来说,实属遗憾。为此,笔者在深入理解二十世纪“对话”思想的基础上解读文本,力图提出有开拓意义的见解。 本文分四部分。第一部分,辨析并界定对话概念。本文认为对话是指在某种关系中处于平等地位的、有一定距离和相通性的主体之间的精神交流或沟通。“对话”具有五大特性,即目的性、关系性、共时性、平等性与未完成性,五大特性是对话的五项基本
3、原则,它们以平等性为核心,相互联系,相互依存,共同筑成对话思想的基石。第二、第三部分,应用对话思想分析文本中体现的对话关系,得出三种对话模式,即显性对话模式、隐性对话模式与自我对话模式,进而得出结论,显性对话模式与隐性对话模式是人与人交流的主要对话模式,二者没有轻重之分,共同为人与人的沟通与交往服务;自我对话模式是显隐交叉对话模式与隐性对话模式的动力源泉。第四部分是关于对话问题的沉思与结论。对话是人与人之间关系的痕迹,是人存在的自我确证;自我对话是一切对话的原动力;个体在社会交往与人生追求中处于有利位置的基础是生存能力卓越,具体表现为外指的自我对话能力卓越,思维敏捷、内心执着、对话技巧丰富。B
4、alzacs masterpiece, Le Pere Goriot, prominent one in The Human Comedy, fully reveals his rich practical experience on art and his creative achievement. The previous researches on Le Pere Goriot were mostly confined to the traditional critical approaches, particularly to the limitation of the social
5、and historical criticism. Those researches virtually highlight techniques of characters representation, real and detailed depiction to environment, the characterization of typical ones, enlightenment language, and profound social significance and so on so forth. It can not fully get rid of the confi
6、nement of the traditional approaches and appropriately exhibit its deep complication in various levels and perspectives, even though Le Pere Goriot has been interpreted by the modern critical approaches. Thus, it is rather regretful for a classic work with the worldwide fame. Accordingly, this thesi
7、s is attempting to delve into the text and to present the exploiting views on the basis of Dialogue idea of the 20th century.The thesis will be divided into four chapters: Chapter one is intended to interpret and define the concept of Dialogue. The thesis points out that the dialogue signifies the s
8、piritual communication among subjects, who are equal, apart and communicative. The dialogue embodies five features, i.e. intention, relationship, synchronicity, equality and incompleteness. As five basic principles of dialogue, they mutually constitute foundation stone of dialogue, and relate with a
9、nd depend on one another. Among these five ones, equality is the essence. Consequently, the dialogue will tend to be mission impossible if devoid of equality. Chapter two and three are aiming at analyzing the relationship of dialogue presented in the text in terms of dialogue idea. On the basis of t
10、his kind of relationship, it is concluded that there are three sorts of dialogue mode, i.e. dialogue mode of the explicit-implicit cross, implicit dialogue mode and self-dialogue mode. Among these three, dialogue modes of the explicit-implicit cross and implicit dialogue mode are the main ones in hu
11、man communication. Both of them play the coequal roles and serve for the human communication jointly, and self-dialogue mode serves as a drive and headspring for them. Chapter four is involved in contemplation and conclusion on dialogue. In some sense, dialogue is an imprint of the human relation an
12、d a confirmation of human existence. Self-dialogue serves as a original drive for all the dialogues. An individual superior in the social communication and life pursuit is always based on his strong capacity of existence, to be specific, his capacity of self-dialogue is excelling and, at the same time, he is quick-minded, clinging and proficient in the techniques of dialogue.
