《课件）-将实证医学纳入临床操作-以dextran之使用为例》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《课件）-将实证医学纳入临床操作-以dextran之使用为例（31页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、將實證醫學納入臨床操作- 以Dextran之使用為例,徐圭璋 高雄榮民總醫院 kchsuvghks.gov.tw,“Leaks” between research & practice,Aware Accept Target Doable Recall Agree Done,Valid Research,0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 x 0.8 = 0.21,Prof. Paul Glasziou, EBM Centre, U. of Oxford, UK,實證醫學實作案例,顯微外科醫師為避免所接合的微小血管在術後阻塞，常用許多抗血栓劑。 Dextran
2、是常用的其中一種，卻又有嚴重併發症的可能， 如過敏性休克、急性腎衰竭、急性呼吸窘迫症候群等。 本科幾乎為常規使用。 基於其可怕併發症，使用之必要性令人懷疑，值得重新評估 。,實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical appraisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence application) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical
3、appraisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence application) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),Clinical Question (PICO),In patients with head and neck cancer, does use of dextran improve free flap survival rate? P (population): Pts with head neck cancer undergoing free flap surgery I (intervention): Dextran (or Rheomacrodex) C (
4、control): none O (outcome): flap failure rate, morbidity OR mortality,實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical appraisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence application) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),Search terms & Strategy,Databases: PubMed, MEDLINE & Cochrane Library Keywords: free flap,
5、Dextran, Rheomacrodex Limitation: Randomized Controlled Trial,PubMed,Dextran-related complications in head and neck microsurgery: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective randomized analysis. Disa JJ, Polvora VP, Pusic AL, Singh B, Cordeiro PG. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1534-9,ME
6、DLINE,Disa JJ. Polvora VP. Pusic AL. Singh B. Cordeiro PG. Dextran-related complications in head and neck microsurgery: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective randomized analysis. Clinical Trial. Journal Article. Randomized Controlled Trial Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 112(6):1534-9,
7、 2003 Nov.,Cochrane Library,Dextran-related complications in head and neck microsurgery: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective randomized analysis. Disa JJ, Polvora VP, Pusic AL, Singh B, Cordeiro PG Year: 2003,實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical app
8、raisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence application) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),嚴格判讀 (Critical appraisal),信度 效度 重要性 實際運用之可能,Systemic complications: The incidence of systemic (cardiac/pulmonary) complications is significantly greater in patients treated with low-molecular-weight dextran for 48 hours (p 0.05) and 120 h
9、ours (p 0.02) compared with patients treated with aspirin (ASA).,(Disa JJ, Polvora VP, Pusic AL, Singh B, Cordeiro PG. Dextran-related complications in head and neck microsurgery: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A prospective randomized analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003 Nov;112(6):1534-9.),Cri
10、tical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP),Chien et al. Aspirin and Low-Dose Heparin in Head and Neck Reconstruction. Laryngoscope. 2005 Jun;115(6):973-6.,400 free flaps for head and neck reconstruction Topical heparin irrigaton only during OP Aspirin 81 mg/day x 7 Only 3 complete flap losses Flap surv
11、ival rate 99.2%,JD Suh, JA Sercarz, E Abemayor et al Archives of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery 2004,Clinical Bottom Line,Dextran對病患是有害的，如果功效不彰，不應使用。 有強烈證據顯示，用了Dextran可以再提高手術成功率的機會非常渺茫。 所以不應使用。,實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical appraisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence ap
12、plication) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),想一下使用證據所需考慮的事,是否已考慮？,研究文獻中的研究對象與臨床上實際面對的病患在本質上的差別 注意文獻中的納入及排除條件 研究文獻中所運用的診斷或治療的方法所帶來的所有可能的好處與壞處 是否已考慮其它替代方案 是否已考慮病患本身的價值觀,考量PESTELS (政經社科族法結),Political Economical Social Technological Ethnical Legal Structural,BMJ 1998;317:139-42,Factors to consider when applying
13、 evidence to individual patients,Is the relative risk reduction that is attributed to the intervention likely to be different in this case because of the patients physiological or clinical characteristics? What is the patients absolute risk of an adverse event without the intervention? Is there sign
14、ificant comorbidity or a contraindication that might reduce the benefit? Are there social or cultural factors that might affect the suitability of treatment or its acceptability? What do the patient and the patient and the patients family want?,指導實證醫學的三種模式,親身示範實證診療 學員將證據視為良好病患照護的一部份 示範指導 學員看著我們運用判斷力
15、將證據應用到決策中 運用實證醫學教導臨床醫學 學員將證據視為良好臨床學習的一部份 將其他知識與實證交錯指導 學員看著我們運用判斷力將證據與其他知識結合 指導特殊的實證醫學技能 學員學習如何瞭解及運用證據 學員在學習過程中確實演練 學員看著我們運用判斷力執行實證醫學五步驟,實證醫學：臨床實踐與教學指引 陳杰峰 王慈蜂 2007,採用方法與結果,實證醫學五步驟,提出問題 (Question formulation) 搜尋證據 (Evidence search) 嚴格判讀 (Critical appraisal) 恰當運用 (Evidence application) 評估結果 (Outcome evaluation),評估結果,評估實證醫學本身各步驟的學習成效 醫療行為依照實證醫學而改變的成效評估 病人的醫療成果評估,結果,本科六位主治醫師於約一年內逐漸停用Dextran。 目前已全面停用約三年。 11/125 Dextran (-) vs 7/125 Dextran (+),想一下該如何評估結果,
