大学课程英语写作

上传人:san****019 文档编号:69888769 上传时间:2019-01-15 格式:PPT 页数:6 大小:254.81KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
大学课程英语写作_第1页
第1页 / 共6页
大学课程英语写作_第2页
第2页 / 共6页
大学课程英语写作_第3页
第3页 / 共6页
大学课程英语写作_第4页
第4页 / 共6页
大学课程英语写作_第5页
第5页 / 共6页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《大学课程英语写作》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《大学课程英语写作(6页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Writing Course (II),Xxh March, 2010,Qualities of a good essay.,Unitysingle central idea 2). Coherenceorganic relationship (logical connection), transitional devices (transitional and synonym); 3). Emphasisby proportion, repetition and position 4). Originality 5). Distinction in style,Write down the

2、Structure of the passage (P. 19),Topic: Killing for Sport is Pure Evil Supporting 1: Some killers kill unscrupulously, while sportsmen kill for evil. Minor Supporting 1: The liar, the swindler and the thief, the murderer do evils not for evils sake. Minor Supporting 2: Sportsman deliberately kills f

3、or evils sake. Supporting 2: Hunters-for-food are as wicked but different from the “sportsmen”. Minor Supporting 1: The rancher and the farmer may kill for supposed good. Minor Supporting 2: To do evil for evils sake is more guilty than other kind of evil doers,Topic selection,A writer has two place

4、s to look for his topic, inside or outside of himself. Inside refers to his own likes or dislikes, care, feelings and passions. Hed better ask the suggested “Wh-” questions on P. 21. Outside refers to the world around him or her.,Narrowing the topic,A. reporters questions“Wh-” questions. B. brainsto

5、rminga variety of possible solutions. C. listinga list items or ideas about the subject. D. loopingwriting on until find a proper core statement. E. cubingsix viewpoints: Description, Comparison, Association, Analysis, Application, Arguing for or against. F. classical inventionDefinition, comparison

6、, relationship, circumstance, testimony. G. reading and researchcollecting information from all types of sources.,专四作文阅卷标准,1513分:文章切题,思想内容表达清楚,行文通顺流畅,连贯性好,论证严密,论据充分,基本上无语言错误。 1210分:文章基本切题,思想内容表达清楚,语言比较通顺,连贯性较好,有极少量语法或语言错误。 97分:文章基本切题,尚能表达中心思想,但是说理不够清楚,文字连贯性不太好,有部分语法或语言错误。 64分:文章基本切题,有些地方思想内容表达不清楚,连贯性差,有明显语法或语言错误。 31分:文章条理不清,思路混乱,语言缺乏连贯,句子错误很多。,

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 高等教育 > 大学课件

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号