no14概率统计模型

上传人:j7****6 文档编号:61697095 上传时间:2018-12-10 格式:PPT 页数:49 大小:478KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
no14概率统计模型_第1页
第1页 / 共49页
no14概率统计模型_第2页
第2页 / 共49页
no14概率统计模型_第3页
第3页 / 共49页
no14概率统计模型_第4页
第4页 / 共49页
no14概率统计模型_第5页
第5页 / 共49页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《no14概率统计模型》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《no14概率统计模型(49页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、概率统计模型,几个概率分布,几个数学模型,均匀分布,(一维连续型),(二维连续型),(多维连续型),使用场合:,1)该问题具有某种均匀性;,2)该问题无任何先验信息。,二项分布,设试验 E 只有两个结果:和 ,记: 独立地重复 n 次。,记作:,只有两个结果:和 ,,使用场合:,独立地重复 n 次。,Poission 分布,使用场合:,具有:,平稳性,独立增量性,普通性,正态分布(normal),y,三倍标准差原则:,使用场合:,满足中心极限定理条件。,二维正态分布,Airline Overbooking(2002 MCM) Youre all packed and ready to go o

2、n a trip to visit your best friend in New York City. After you check in at the ticket counter, the airline clerk announces that your fright has been overbooked passengers need to check in immediately to determine if they still have a seat.,Historically, airlines know that only a certain percentage o

3、f passengers who have made reservations on a particular flight will actually take that flight. Consequently, most airlines overbook that is, they take more reservations than the capacity of the aircraft. Occasionally, more passengers will want to take a flight than the capacity of the plane, leading

4、 to one or more passengers being bumped and thus unable to take the flight for which they had reservations.,Airlines deal with bumped passengers in various ways. Some are given nothing, some are booked on later flights on other airlines, and some are given some kind of cash or airline ticket incenti

5、ve. Consider the overbooking issue in light of the current situation:,fewer flights by airlines from point A to point B; heightened security at and around airports, passengers fear, and loss of billions of dollars in revenue by airlines to date.,Build a mathematical model that examines the effects t

6、hat different overbooking schemes have on the revenue received by an airline company, in order to find an optimal overbooking strategy -that is, the number of people by which an airline should overbook a particular flight so that the companys revenue is maximized. Ensure that your model reflects the

7、 issues above and consider alternatives for handling “bumped“ passengers. Additionally, write a short memorandum to the airlines CEO summarizing your findings and analysis.,Technical Considerations,If the airline arranges substitute transportation such that the passenger will reach his/her destinati

8、on within one hour of the original flights arrival time, there is no obligatory compensation.,If the airline arranges substitute transportation such that the passenger will reach his/her destination between one and two hours after the original flights arrival time, the airline must pay the passenger

9、 an amount equal to the one-way fare for flight to the final destination.,Frontier offers only one class of service to all passengers. Thus, we base our overbooking models on single-class aircraft.,If the substitute transportation is scheduled to arrive any later than two hours after the original fl

10、ights arrival time, or if the airline does not make any substitute travel arrangements, the airline must pay an amount equal to twice the cost of the fare to the final destination.,We need concern ourselves only with the sale of restricted tickets. Frontiers are nonrefundable, save for the ability t

11、o transfer to another Frontier flight for $60 Frontier 2001. Restricted tickets represent all but a very small percentage of all tickets, and many ticket brokers, such as P, sell only restricted tickets.,Airline booking considerations are frequently based on the break-even load-factor, a percentage

12、of airplane seat capacity that must be filled to acquire neither loss or profit on a particular flight. The break-even load-factor for Flight 502 in 2001 was 57.8%.,No Overbooking,Bump Threshold Model,Linear Compensation Plan,Modeling:,Nonlinear Compensation Plan,Time-Dependent Compensation Plane,Re

13、sults:,No Overbooking,Lost opportunity cost $300*16 = $4,800 !,Bump Threshold Model,Linear Compensation Plan,Nonlinear Compensation Plan,Time-Dependent Compensation Plane,Profitability is maximized around B=160,一件产品由若干零件组装而成,标志产品性能的某个参数取决于这些零件的参数,零件参数包括标定值和容差两部分进行成批生产时,标定值表示一批零件该参数的平均值,容差则给出了参数偏离其标定

14、值的容许范围若将零件参数视为随机变量,则标定值代表期望值,在生产部门无特殊要求时,容差通常规定为均方差的3倍。 进行零件参数设计,就是要确定其标定值和容差这时要考虑两方面因素;,零件的参数设计(CUMCM 1997年A题),一、当各零件组装成产品时,如果产品参数偏离预先设定的目标值,就会造成质量损失,偏离越大,损失越大; 二、零件容差的大小决定了其制造成本,容差设计得越小,成本越高。,试通过如下的具体问题给出一般的零件参数设计方法: 粒子分离器某参数( y )由7个零件的参数( x1,x2,x7 )决定,经验公式为:,y 的目标值( y0 )为1.50当 y 偏离y00.1时,产品为次品,质量

15、损失为1000元;当y偏离y00.3时,产品为废品,损失为9000元,A等为l,B等为5,C等为l0,,现进行成批生产,每批产量1000个,在原设计中,7个零件参数的标定值为: x1=0.1, x2=0.3,x3=0.1 x4=0.1, x5=1.5 x6=16, x7=0.75; 容差均取最便宜的等级。,请你综合考虑 y 偏离 y0 造成的损失和零件成本,重新设计零件参数(包括标定值和容差),并与原设计比较,总费用降低了多少。,损失函数 1,损失函数 2,基本模型,自动化车床管理CUMCMl999年A题),一道工序用自动化车床连续加工某种零件,由于刀具损坏等原因该工序会出现故障,其中刀具损坏

16、故障占95,其他故障仅占5工序出现故障是完全随机的,假定在生产任一零件时出现故障的机会均相同工作人员通过检查零件来确定工序是否出现故障 现积累有100次刀具故障记录,故障出现时该刀具完成的零件数如附表现计划在刀具加工一定件数后定期更换新刀具 已知生产工序的费用参数如下:,故障时产出的零件损失费用 f=200 元/件 进行检查的费用 t=10 元次; 发现故障进行调节使恢复正常的平均费用d=3000 元/次 (包括刀具费); 未发现故障时更换一把新刀具的费用 k=1000 元/次,假定工序故障时产出的零件均为不合格品,正常时产出的零件均为合格品。试对该工序设计效益最好的检查间隔(生产多少零件检查一次)和刀具更换策略。 如果该工序正常时产出的零件不全是合格品,有2为不合格品;而工序故障时产出的零件有40为合格品,60%为不合格品工序正常而误认有故障停机产生的损失费用为1500元次对该工序设计效益最好的检查间隔和刀具更换策略。 在2. 的情况可否改进检查方式

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 社会民生

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号