英文中国哲学史著作读书会

上传人:子 文档编号:52247879 上传时间:2018-08-19 格式:PPT 页数:18 大小:239KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
英文中国哲学史著作读书会_第1页
第1页 / 共18页
英文中国哲学史著作读书会_第2页
第2页 / 共18页
英文中国哲学史著作读书会_第3页
第3页 / 共18页
英文中国哲学史著作读书会_第4页
第4页 / 共18页
英文中国哲学史著作读书会_第5页
第5页 / 共18页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《英文中国哲学史著作读书会》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《英文中国哲学史著作读书会(18页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy Ch. 10: Debates on Metaphysical Concepts The Logicians英文中國哲學史著作讀書會 國立台灣大學哲學系 魏家豪 2008.08.29導讀大綱本章序言注意事項當代研究方向導讀大綱本章序言注意事項當代研究方向本章序言Four topicslPlace in Chinese traditionlWhat and howlIdentificationlLack of influence本章序言Place in Chinese traditionlConnection: concer

2、n for relation between names and actualitylUnique position: primarily devoted to logical consideration; intellectualism for its own sake本章序言What and howlWhatlNames and actualitylOther issues: existence, relativity, time, quality, actuality, causeslHowlDialogues, aphorisms and paradoxeslNot: syllogis

3、m, laws of thought, systematic argumentation本章序言IdentificationlSchool, but not easily identifiablelHui Shih and Kung-sun Lung most prominentlNot unanimous in opinion (and Mohist influence)Hui ShihKung-sun Longrelativeabsolutechangepermanence, universalityall things are one (rational knowledge)本章序言La

4、ck of influencelNon-interest in logiclHistorical circumstanceslHuman problems / social reform導讀大綱本章序言注意事項當代研究方向注意事項IntroductionlSchool (difference in opinion)lIntellectualism for its own sake or not? (Mohist doctrine) Translation and interpretation No explicitly stated interpretation Careful approac

5、h (e.g. 238, based on textual corruption; n.14) Whiteness - hardness導讀大綱本章序言注意事項當代研究方向當代研究方向Basic bibliographylGraham, A.C. 1978. Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.lHansen, Chad. 1992. A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. N

6、ew York/Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press (pp. 233-264).lHarbsmeier, Christoph. 1998. Language and Logic. Volume 7.1 in Joseph Needham (ed.), Science and Civilisation in Ancient China. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press (esp. pp. 286-358).當代研究方向ImportancelHow it developed (ethical vs. descriptive terms)lWhat

7、 it tells us (theories of language and meaning)lHow it influenced (esp. Zhuangzi and Xunzi; key terms)lRevaluationlPosition of Later Mohism (and school-view)當代研究方向IdentificationlTendency rather than schoollSame concern, different agendaslE.g. Hansen (1992)lLater Mohism Mohism lKung-sun Long Confucia

8、nism (正名)lHui Shih Daoism (氾愛萬物,天地一體也)當代研究方向Interpretation: negative sidelReluctance to use nominalized adjectives (whiteness) and concepts like “concept,” “belief,” “idea,” “truth,” “universal,” “property” etc. in interpretation Argument from Absence of Western-like theories of mind/language in whi

9、ch these terms function Difference in syntactical structure between Indo-European languages and classical Chinese (sentence structure, morphology)當代研究方向Interpretation: positive sidelAttention to language and talk about language in a Chinese contextlAlternative / challenge to Western philosophy當代研究方向

10、Interpretation: example (Hansen 1992)lFocus on terms, guiding functionlWhole part analysis, with focus on picking out a range or scopelProblem for 復名:two different modelsl牛馬 l堅白lKung-sun Lung as viewing 堅白 in terms of 牛馬A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy Ch. 10: Debates on Metaphysical Concepts The Logicians英文中國哲學史著作讀書會 國立台灣大學哲學系 魏家豪 2008.08.29

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 科普知识

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号