Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院

上传人:飞*** 文档编号:51225240 上传时间:2018-08-13 格式:PPT 页数:40 大小:6.03MB
返回 下载 相关 举报
Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院_第1页
第1页 / 共40页
Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院_第2页
第2页 / 共40页
Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院_第3页
第3页 / 共40页
Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院_第4页
第4页 / 共40页
Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院_第5页
第5页 / 共40页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《Revision Total Hip [ppt] - Lancashire Teaching Hospitals:髋关节翻修【PPT】-兰开斯特教学医院(40页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、Revision Hip ReplacementRichard BodenConsultant Trauma and Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgeon (locum) Lancashire Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOverview Background of THR THR Failure Aims of Revision Basic Technique Complications Cases QuestionsBackground 86,488 hips in 2012 7.5% increase Revisi

2、on hips 12% 11% 2011TJA Volume EstimatesAge at THRAge at THRAv Age 68.7 yrsBMIBMIBMIFailure MethodFailure MethodMethodPercentage1Aseptic Loosening40%2Pain23%3Dislocation/Subluxation13%LysisSoft Tissue Reaction6Infection12%Acetabular Component Wear8Periprosthetic Fracture8%9Malalignment5%10Implant Fa

3、ilure3%Failure MethodMethodPercentage1Aseptic Loosening40%2Pain23%3Dislocation/Subluxation13%LysisSoft Tissue Reaction6Infection12%Acetabular Component Wear8Periprosthetic Fracture8%9Malalignment5%10Implant Failure3%Failure MethodMethodPercentage1Aseptic Loosening40%2Pain23%3Dislocation/Subluxation1

4、3%Lysis13%Soft Tissue Reaction13%6Infection12%Acetabular Component Wear12%8Periprosthetic Fracture8%9Malalignment5%83%Aims of Revision Hip Removal loose components Limit destruction of host bone/soft tissue Reconstruction bone defects Metal Bone Graft Stable revision implants Restore normal hip COR

5、(biomechanics)Timing of THR Failure Early Recurrent dislocation Infection Implant failure Intra-operative fracture Later Wear of bearing surface Osteolysis Mechanical loosening Infection Peri-prosthetic fracture Metal on MetalTiming of THR Failure Early Recurrent dislocation Infection Implant failur

6、e Intra-operative fracture Late Wear of bearing surface Osteolysis Mechanical loosening Infection Peri-prosthetic fracture Metal on MetalTiming of THR Failure 1.8% failure 9 yearsAseptic/Mechanical Loosening Most common indication for revision Regular radiological follow- up Observe zones Observe pr

7、ogression Note symptoms Early to avoid depleted bone stockAseptic/Mechanical LooseningGruenDeLee-CharnleyWear of Articular Bearing Surface Bearing Traditional Poly UHMWPE Ceramic Metal Ceramic Fractures? SQUEAKSOsteolysis Tissue response to wear debris Debris Phagocytosis Macrophage activation OSTEO

8、LYSIS Most common with TRADITIONAL polyethylene bearingsDislocation/Instability Dislocation 1-2% Component position Acetabulum Femoral Soft tissue Tension (offset) Function Components used Head size ConstrainedMetal on Metal HipsMetal on Metal HipsMetal on Metal HipsMetal on Metal HipsPeri-Prostheti

9、c Fracture Stress risers Osteoporotic bone Implant fixation Vancouver: A- trochanteric B- prosthesis 1- Implant stable 2- Implant loose 3- plus poor bone C- distalInfection Clean air theatre Elective wards Skin prep Surgical technique Time Tissue handling Patient factors Abx v Surgery?Infection 90%

10、Gram Positives Staph Aureus CNS But Gram Negatives increasing! Only 12% have systemic symptomsInfection Early 3 weeks Cure with DAIR 1 week up to 90% 1 2 weeks 50/50 3 weeks plus 10%InfectionSingle Stage Stage 1 Stage 2 Hip Excision 24% 37% 36% 3% Up to 90% cureRadical Debridement Essential to the p

11、rocedure Treat like a tumourCost of RevisionActivityCost per case Total Income10,097Total Costs11,998 (-1,901)Theatre 3,181Nursing 1,610Corporate Costs 1,217Prosthetics 1,132Consultant 746Site costs 688Drugs 438Radiology 96Pathology 94Pharmacy 88Cost of RevisionProcedureLOS (days) Total Cost Peripro

12、sthetic Fracture1618,400 1st Stage/Pseudarthrosis1714,240Exchange Resurfacing68,980 Direct Exchange79,230Revision Much more difficult than primary Poor results (comparatively) Up to 20% infection rate 29% failure at 8 years 5% dislocation risk Require excellent pre-op planning with good choice of im

13、plantPre-op Good films, long leg AP and Lat. CT for acetabulum? Get original op note for component size and make Get equipment to remove Order bone struts etc. Have a good choice of prosthesisSurgery - Femur Use previous skin incision if possible In-cement revision Cement out from top? Extended troc

14、hanteric osteotomy Radical debridement in infection Bypass stress-riser with long stemSurgery - Acetabulum Consider uncemented with screws if rim is intact (or at least 2/3) Bone graft defects (controversial in infection) Structural allograft in large defect High failure rate (40%) if resorbed Mesh? Cage? Trabecular metal? Constrained liner?Summary Monitor new pains Startup pain Groin pain Suspect wear and loosening Suspect infection Check XR Early referralThank You

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 行业资料 > 其它行业文档

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号