《新GRE写作官方范文赏析-智课教育旗下智课教育》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《新GRE写作官方范文赏析-智课教育旗下智课教育（5页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料新GRE写作官方范文赏析-智课教育旗下智课教育新GRE写作官方范文赏析，我们来一起赏析，看看它为何能得满分 ，从中能不能借鉴到一些好的写作技巧和方法。 The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper: “Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also in
2、crease. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money.“ Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For
3、example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more
4、logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion. GRE首段 This argument states that it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer because by making the workplace safer then lower wages could be paid to employees. This conclusion is based on the
5、 premise that as the list of physical injury increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Howeveer, there are several assumptions that may not necessarily apply to this argument. For example, the costs associated with making the workplace safe must outweigh the increased payroll expe
6、nses due to hazardous conditions. Also, one must look at the plausability of improving the workenvironment. And finally, because most companies agree that as the risk of injury increases so will wages doesnt necessarily mean that the all companies which have hazardous work environments agree. GRE中间段
7、1 The first issue to be addressed is whether increased labor costs justify large capital expenditures to improve the work environment. Clearly one could argue that if making the workplace safe would cost an exorbitant amount of money in comparison to leaving the workplace as is and paying slightly i
8、ncreased wages than it would not make sense to improve the work environment. For example, if making the workplace safe would cost $100 million versus additional payroll expenses of only $5,000 per year, it would make financial sense to simply pay the increased wages. No business or business owner wi
9、th any sense would pay all that extra money just to save a couple dollars and improve employee health and relations. To consider this, a cost benefit analysis must be made. I also feel that although a cost benefit analysis should be the determining factor with regard to these decisions making financ
10、ial sense, it may not be the determining factor with regard to making social, moral and ethical sense. GRE中间段2 This argument also relies on the idea that companies solely use financial sense in analysing improving the work environment. This is not the case. Companies look at other considerations suc
11、h as the negative social ramifications of high on-job injuries. For example, Toyota spends large amounts of money improving its environment because while its goal is to be profitable, it also prides itself on high employee morale and an almost perfectly safe work environment. However, Toyota finds t
12、hat it can do both, as by improving employee health and employee relationsthey are guaranteed a more motivated staff, and hence a more efficient staff; this guarantees more money for the business as well as more safety for the employees. GRE中间段3 Finally one must understand that not all work environm
13、ents can be made safer. For example, in the case of coal mining, a company only has limited ways of making the work environment safe. While companies may be able to ensure some safety precautions, they may not be able to provide all the safety measures necessary. In other words, a mining company has
14、 limited ability to control the air quality within a coal mine and therefore it cannot control the risk of employees getting blacklung. In other words, regardless of the intent of the company, some jobs are simply dangerous in nature. GRE末端In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial
15、sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not make financial sense. Furthermore, financial sense may not be the only issue a company faces. Other types of analyses must be made such as the social ramifications of an unsafe work environment and the overall ability of
16、 a company to improve that environment (i.e,coal mine).Before any decision is made, all this things must be considered, not simply the reduction of payroll expenses. 上述就是一篇新GRE写作官方范文赏析，希望可以给大家参考。 您可能还关注： 如何准备GRE Agument写作论证 新GRE argument写作如何应对 GRE高频作文示例讲解 分享到： 上一篇：拿下新GRE作文argument三步走 下一篇：如何增加GRE作文词汇量
