《2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经-智课教育》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经-智课教育（6页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资料2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经-智课教育智课教育2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经 4.在palm grove 买地 【本月原始】 作文是说，一个retail owner建议她的合伙人在P地买retail，因为比起D地，P地的real estate 价格过去5年一直在涨，所以在P地买会有interest。lz反驳：1.real est ate和retai不一样，前一个涨价后一个不一定涨2.过去涨现在不一定涨3. interest取决于价格和成本，P地购房成本也更高，不见得能有利润 【考古】 From GMAT AWA 最新题库 -
2、 2010 The following appeared in a letter from apart-owner of a small retail clothing chain to her business partner:“Commercial real estate prices have been rising steadily in the Sandida Heights neighborhood for several years, while the prices in the adjacent neighborhood of Palm Grove have remained
3、 the same. It seems obvious, then, that a retail space in Sandida Heights must now be much more expensive than a similar space in Palm Grove, which was not the case several years ago. So, it appears that retail spaces in Sandida Heights are now overpriced relative to those in Palm Grove. Therefore,
4、it would be in our financial interest to purchase a retail space in Palm Grove rather than in Sandida Heights. 【参考思路】 1. 错误类比：S和P难以类比，地区之间必然存在差异，因为要考虑 经济、人口、交通等问题，不能单凭地价上涨与否判断哪个地方的地价 高，哪个地方更值得投资。 2. 因果关系-忽略他因：To increase financial interest不一定是因 为低价买到了一块地，还要考虑产品销量、交通便利、地区客流量等因 素。3. 因果关系-错误因果：The clai
5、m that retail spaces in Sandide Heights are now overpriced does not necessarily proves that purchasing a retail space in Palm Grove can bring about financial interest. S的门店价格高不能说明在P投资就能赚钱。S的地价高，就一 定没有financial benifits吗?因为S的地价在上涨，这个反倒说明在S买 地能带来利益。为了更好地评价financial interest，我们还应该了解S 地门店价格的趋势，并比较两地的商业利
6、益。 4. 无根据假设：The real estate price in Sadida Heights have risen while then prices in Palm Grove have remained unchanged is not sufficient to reach the conclusion that a retail space in Sandida Heights is not much more expensive than a similar in Plam Grove. 事实可能是S的原地价就比较低，而P的地价比较高，所以 虽然S的地价一直涨，但是还是比P
7、的便宜。 5. 脑洞大开假设(谨慎参考)：因为价格低，所以在P买地，也许不 是个好主意，其他竞争对手也会有同样的想法，最后导致P的竞争压力 大。 5.三家店 【本月原始】作文 在一个地方的一个ditrict 三个club shop之类的都had business increase during the past 2 years 所以 认为应该做investment给另外一个区的三个公司之类 而且应该同时offer a special program 就是customer pratronize 2 of them can enjoy a discount 说这样比较能三个都发展好 而且 回本 【
8、 考古原题】 The following appeared as part of the business plan of the Capital Idea investment firm: “Across town in the Park Hill district, the Thespian Theater, Pizzazz Pizza, and the Niblick Golf Club have all had business increases over the past two years. Capital Idea should therefore invest in the
9、Roxy Playhouse, the Slice-o-Pizza, and the Divot Golf Club, three new businesses in the Irongate district. As a condition, we should require them to participate in a specialprogram: Any customer who patronizes two of the businesses will receive a substantial discount at the third. By motivating cust
10、omers to patronize all three, we will thus contribute to the profitability of each and maximize our return.“ 【参考思路】 1. 错误类比：PH地区与I地区不同，在PH地区成功的business在I 地区不一定成功，人口，habit等不同。 2. 因果关系：即使这三种business会成功，那么这特定的三家店也 不一定能成功，还要看该店的经营、销售、服务等等。 3. 无根据假设：即使捆绑三个店，顾客也不一定会每个店都去消费。 4.Profit除了与销售量有关，与成本也有关，不能单纯因为去
11、的人 可能增加就认为profit会增加，还要考虑成本、折扣等等。 【参考范文】The argument states that if by motivating customers to patronize all three Businesses of Capital Investment, the profitability of each business will increase and maximize return for Capital investment.To achieve this the firm proposes to initiate a program wher
12、e if a customer patronizes two of the Businesses , he will receive substantial discount on the third. However there are several assumptions that the argument is based on for which it does not give sufficient evidence. Firstly, The argument assumes that people will not otherwise go to all the three p
13、laces if they go to the two places. There is no evidence to support this assumption. For example, certain demographic groups may enjoy watching theatre, playing golf and may like to eat out as well frequently. They may not select two out of the three. So by giving them heavy discount on something th
14、at they would have anyways chosen may actually negatively impact the profits. Secondly, the argument gives the example of the success of the three businesses in the Park Hall district. However it does notclearly state the reasons behind the success of the businesses there. It appears that Capital Id
15、ea selected these businesses to invest specifically for the unique combination which they found to be successful in Park Hill district. If this is the case then the three businesses are complementary to one another and hence they will succeed as a group. So there seems no reason to explicitly ask cu
16、stomer to patronize the three at the cost of a discount. In conclusion the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons. It can be strengthened if more evidence is given to substantiate why the proposed program would work. Without these the argument remains unconvincing and open to debate. 完整机经版本点击下载： 2015-06-23最新更新GMAT作文机经 以上就是智课教育小编为大家整理的2015-06-23最新更新GMAT 作文机经，希望能对大家的GMAT作文备考有帮助，在此，小编祝大家 都能取得理想的成绩。
