随机多通道溶质运移

上传人:子 文档编号:45822651 上传时间:2018-06-19 格式:PDF 页数:37 大小:459.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
随机多通道溶质运移_第1页
第1页 / 共37页
随机多通道溶质运移_第2页
第2页 / 共37页
随机多通道溶质运移_第3页
第3页 / 共37页
随机多通道溶质运移_第4页
第4页 / 共37页
随机多通道溶质运移_第5页
第5页 / 共37页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《随机多通道溶质运移》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《随机多通道溶质运移(37页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、A stochastic multi-channel model for solute transportanalysis of tracer tests in fractured rockIvars Neretnieks*Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Royal Institute of Technology, 10044 Stockholm, SwedenReceived 26 July 2000; received in revised form 7 September 2001; accepted 24 Septe

2、mber 2001AbstractSome of the basic assumptions of the advectiondispersion model (AD-model) are revisited. This model assumes a continuous mixing along the flowpath similar to Fickian diffusion. This implies that there is a constant dispersion length irrespective of observation distance. This is cont

3、rary to most field observations. The properties of an alternative model based on the assumption that individual water packages can retain their identity over long distances are investigated. The latter model is called the multi-channel model (MCh-model). Inherent in the latter model is that if the w

4、aters in the different pathways are collected and mixed, the dispersion length is proportional to distance. The conditions for when non-mixing between adjacent streams can be assumed are explored. The MCh- and AD-models are found to have very similar residence time distributions (RTD) for Peclet num

5、bers larger than 3. A generalized relation between flowrate and residence time is developed, including the so-called cubic law and constant aperture assumptions. The two models extrapolate very differently when there is strong matrix interaction. The AD-model could severely underestimate the effluen

6、t concentration of a tracer pulse and overestimate the residence time. The conditions are explored for when in-filling particles in the fracture will not be equilibrated but will act as if there was seemingly a much larger flow wetted surface (FWS). It is found that for strongly sorbing tracers, rel

7、atively small particles can act in this way for systems and conditions that are typical of many tracer tests. The assumption that the tracer residence time found by cautiously injecting a small stream of traced water represents the residence time in the whole fracture is explored. It is found that t

8、he traced stream can potentially sample a much larger fraction of the fracture than the ratio between the traced flowrate and the total pumped flowrate. The MCh-model was used to simulate some recent tracer tests in what is assumed to be a single fracture at the Aspo Hard rock laboratory in Sweden.

9、Non-sorbing tracers, HTO and Uranin were0169-7722/02/$ - see front matter D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. PII: S0169-7722(01)00195-4*Fax: +46-8-105228. E-mail address: niquelket.kth.se center (I. Neretnieks) of Contaminant Hydrology 55 (2002) 175211used to determine the mean reside

10、nce time and its variance. Laboratory data on diffusion and sorption properties were used to predict the RTD of the sorbing tracers. At least 30 times larger FWS or 1000 times larger diffusion or sorption coefficients would be needed to explain the observed BTCs. Some possible reasons for such behav

11、ior are also explored. D 2002 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.Keywords: Groundwater; Solute transport; Fractures; Modelling1. Introduction and backgroundIt has been increasingly recognized that dispersion is not always Fickian. Compilations of dispersion data show that over a very large ra

12、nge of observation distances, the dispersion length increases with distance (Lallemand-Barres and Peaudecerf, 1978; Matheron and de Marsily, 1980; Neretnieks, 1981, 1983, 1993; Gelhar et al., 1992; Gelhar, 1993). It is, however, common practice to use the advectiondispersion (AD) equation, with a co

13、nstant dispersion length, to analyze, simulate and predict tracer transport in the ground. For a given distance, the advectiondispersion, the channeling, the channel network and probably several other models can be made to adequately describe a tracer breakthrough curve. In the AD-model, a constant

14、dispersion length is then typically used. This has some strange consequences. Assume that we choose a dispersion length a when simulating the tracer breakthrough curve at distance L along the flowpath. The commonly used analytical solutions have been obtained based on the assumption that a is consta

15、nt all along the path. With the same solution, one could predict the tracer breakthrough curve also at, say a distance L/10 along the flow path. This, however, is in violation of the observations that at distance L/10 the dispersion length is a/10. We would thus obtain a different breakthrough curve

16、, were we to use a/10 to make pre- dictions for the distance L/10. It may thus be concluded that the common analytical solution(s) based on a constant a cannot give a correct representation of the transport along all the flowpath. Let us then consider an alternative approach. Assume that a increases with distance from the point where the tracer is injected and downstream. This is readily incorporated in numerical schemes to solve the ad

展开阅读全文
相关资源
相关搜索

当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 科普知识

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号