《论行政调查之证据及调查方法── 以行政程序法相关规定为中心》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《论行政调查之证据及调查方法── 以行政程序法相关规定为中心(8页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、東海大學法學研究第三十五期12011.12論行政調查之證據及調查方法以行政程序法相關規定為中心洪家殷目 次壹、前言 貳、行政調查與職權調查主義 一、行政調查之概念 二、行政調查中之職權調查主 義 參、行政調查中之證據及調查方法 之選擇 一、行政調查與證據之關係 二、調查之程序及調查方法之 選擇 肆、與行政程序法有關之調查方 法一、概述 二、通知陳述意見 三、要求提供文書、資料或物 品 四、送請鑑定 五、進行勘驗 六、詢問證人 伍、行政程序法相關規定之檢討 及修正代結論中文關鍵詞: 行政調查、職權調查主義、行政調查之方法、行 政調查之證據、證據能力、證據證明力、陳述意 見、提供文書、送請鑑定、勘
2、驗、證人 Key Words:administrative investigation, administrative authority investigation, burden of proof, doctrine of distribution of the burden of proof, importance of decision, evidence necessary, principle of proportionality, Duty 東吳大學法律學系教授。投稿日期:100 年 2 月 8 日;審查通過日期:100 年 5 月 31 日。行政法上請求權時效不完成制度2of
3、cooperation中文摘要行政機關於從事各種行政行為時,應本於其職權,運用各種 調查方法,取得證據,再透過評價形成心證,以釐清事實並作成最終之決定。有關行政機關從事調查及適用證據法則之規定,向來不受行政機關之重視,尤其與證據有關之原理原則,更少見有深入之探討者。此外,有關取得證據及釐清事實之方法,本於職 權調查主義,由行政機關裁量決定之。至於有那些被容許之調查方法,現行法中,較為重要者,可見於行政程序法,於該法第 39 條至第 42 條分別列舉出四種調查方法,即通知陳述意見、要求提供文書等、送請鑑定及進行勘驗。此外,尚有涉及證人之規定。本文乃以該法為探討之中心,針對相關之條文規定,分別就證
4、據及 各種不同之調查方法依序論述之,最終並提出檢討及修法之建議。AbstractIt depends on the correct facts to make correct decisions for administrative agency. So it is necessary for administrative agency to clean facts, and administrative agency will valuate to form the opinions to make decisions.In Taiwan, the codes of administrati
5、ve investigation is not available until now, but spreads on different areas of laws and regulations. The articles 36-43 of the administrative process law are the general regulations of administrative investigation of the facts and evidence.東海大學法學研究第三十五期32011.12The articls36 of the administrative pro
6、cess law is the “administrative authority investigation”. While administrative authority investigation concerns about different means and responsibilities of investigations, it is necessary to understand the connotations of it. Secondly, it is the duty of administrative agency to invest the differen
7、t kinds of evidence, but it still has the limitation.To clarify the concept and the range of the administrative authority investigation, this thesis consists of several points below: first of all, this thesis would like to establish the concept of administrative authority investigation, and doing ne
8、cessary researches of administrative authority investigation. Secondly, this thesis would analyze the indispensable standards as “evidence necessary” “principle of proportionality” “Duty of cooperation” etc. This thesis would also analyze the recent judgments of the Supreme Administrative Court. We
9、hope we could offer some advises to advance the fragments of laws in our country.行政法上請求權時效不完成制度4參考文獻一、中文部分吳庚,行政爭訟法論,自版,2009 年 2 月。(Geng Wu, Administrative Appeal and Litigation Law, Geng Wu, Feb., 2009.)吳庚,行政法之理論與實用,自版,2010 年 9 月。(Geng Wu, The Theories and Practices of Administrative Law, Geng Wu, S
10、ep., 2010.)李震山,行政法導論,三民,2009 年 9 月。(Jhen-Shan Lee, The Introduction of Administrative Law, Sanmin, Sep., 2009.)李惠宗,行政法要義,元照,2008 年 9 月。(Hwai-Tzong Lee, The Concise of Administrative Law, Angle, Sep., 2008.)李建良,稅務行政訴訟若干舉證問題析論以台北高等行政 法院 97 年度訴字第 1792 號判決為例,台灣法學雜誌第 173 期,2011 年 4 月,頁 57-75。(Chien-Liang
11、 Lee, The Doctrines of Distribution of the Burden of Proof in the Tax Litigation-example as 1792th. judgment 2008, Taipei high Administrative court, Taiwan Law Journal, 173, Apr., 2011, pp.57-75.)林鈺雄,刑事訴訟法(上),自版,2007 年 9 月。(Yu-Syong Lin, The Textbook of Code of Criminal Procedure 1, Yu-Syong Lin, Se
12、p., 2007.)林錫堯,行政程序上職權調查主義,當代公法理論,翁岳生 教授六柣誕辰祝壽論文集,月旦,1993 年 5 月,頁 323- 335。(Si-Yao Lin, The Principle of Authority Investigation in Administrative Procedure Law, in: The Presents Public Law Theory, Textbook for Dr. Wong Yueh- Shengs 60th birthday, Angle, Sep., 2008, pp.323-335.)洪文玲,行政調查與法之制約,學知,1998
13、年 3 月。(Wun- Ling Hong, The Administrative Investigation and its Control of Law, Syue Jhih, Ltd. Sep., 2007.)東海大學法學研究第三十五期52011.12洪文玲,行政證據法則之研究,二十一世紀公法的新課題, 城仲模教授古稀祝壽論文集,臺灣法治暨政策研究基金會出 版,2008 年 9 月,頁 339-362。(Wun-Ling Hong, The Doctrines of Evidence in Administrative Law in:“The New Issues of 21th Cen
14、turys Public Law Theory” Textbook for Dr. Cheng Jhong- Mos 70th birthday, Taiwans Law and Policy foundation Research published, Sep., 2008, pp.339-362.)洪文玲,行政調查中進入處所查驗程序之研究,第六屆東吳 公法研討會,社會基本權與行政調查制度,東吳大學公法研 究中心主辦,2009 年 5 月 16 日。(Wun-Ling Hong, The Location entering of examining Procedure in dministr
15、ative Investigation, the 6th Soochow University Public Law seminar, May, 16, 2009.)法治斌主持,行政檢查之研究,行政院研考會委託之研究計 畫,行政院研考會,1996 年 6 月。(Jhih-Bin Fa, The Doctrines of Administrative Investigation, Research, Development And Evaluation Commission, Executive Yuan, Jun., 1996.)洪家殷,論行政調查中職權調查之概念及範圍-以行政程序 法相關規定
16、為中心,東吳法律學報第 21 卷第 3 期,2010 年 1 月,頁 1-42。(Jia-Yin Hong, The Concepts and scoops of Authority Investigation in Administrative Investigationfocus on the Administrative Procedure Law, Soochow Law Review, 213, Jan., 2010, pp.1-42.)胡博硯,金融監理與行政調查證券交易法中當事人之協力 義務,台灣法學雜誌第 168 期,2011 年 1 月,頁 66- 83。(Bo-Yann Hu, Financial Overseeing and Administrative InvestigationThe Duty of Unites Efforts, Taiwan Law Journal, 168, Jan.,