a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english 英语专业毕业论文

上传人:aa****6 文档编号:38202853 上传时间:2018-04-28 格式:DOC 页数:11 大小:376.50KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english  英语专业毕业论文_第1页
第1页 / 共11页
a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english  英语专业毕业论文_第2页
第2页 / 共11页
a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english  英语专业毕业论文_第3页
第3页 / 共11页
a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english  英语专业毕业论文_第4页
第4页 / 共11页
a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english  英语专业毕业论文_第5页
第5页 / 共11页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english 英语专业毕业论文》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《a study on the quality of achievement test paper of junior english 英语专业毕业论文(11页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、A Study on the Quality of Achievement Test Paper of Junior English内容:Abstract: Based on the theory of Bachman Multiple Choice Question, which occupies 15% of the total score; Cloze, 10%; Reading Comprehension, 30%; Task-based Reading, 10%; and the last part, writing, which occupies 15% of the total

2、score.2.2. Reliability EstimateReliability is the extent to which test scores are consistent: a quality assessing whether candidates can get the same results on different dates (assuming there is no change in their ability). Reliability is a property of the test as a measuring instrument, but is als

3、o relative to the candidates taking the test: a test may be reliable with one population, but not with another. And next the author will make estimation about this test paper utilizing the instrument-SPSS.The following is the descriptive statistics of the results of the terminal junior test paper.Gr

4、aph1 统计量统计量LCMCQClozeRCTBRWritingTS有效40404040404040N缺失0000000均值13.909.954.3025.004.505.8863.50中值14.009.504.0028.005.006.0066.50众数1793286867标准差3.4772.8642.2896.4213.2263.61814.915方差12.0928.2035.24141.23110.41013.087222.462偏度-.605-.712.164-1.840-.005.045-.916偏度的标准误.374.374.374.374.374.374.374峰度-.532.3

5、02-1.1052.720-1.203-.903.728峰度的标准误.733.733.733.733.733.733.733极小值63160024极大值1915830101387Where: LC=Listening Comprehension, MCQ=Multiple Choice Question, RC=Reading Comprehension, TBR=Task-based Reading, TS=Total Score.And the following one is the normal distribution of the students total scores:Gra

6、ph2From the value of skewness and kurtosis, and the normal distribution of the total score, it can be discovered that the test scores are normally distributed. From the graph, it can be seen that the skewness is -0.916 and kurtosis 0.728, according to the English language testing theory, values for

7、skewness and kurtosis of between -2 and+2 indicate a reasonable normal distribution. That is to say, the data of this paper is reliable. And the standard deviation of this test paper is 14.915, which indicates that the discrimination of students scores is big. Therefore, we can say that the test res

8、ults are reliable and can reflect test takers language ability and are also the basis for guarantee the whole test papers validity. However, the mean of the fourth part (Reading Comprehension) is 25point, whose total score is 30 point, and the highest score is 30 point, the lowest one is 6 point. It

9、 is because most of the students are familiar with the material of the selected articles in the fourth part. The kurtosis of RC is 2.720, it is a positive kurtosis and indicates that this part is a little easy, and the discrimination of students score is small. The detail analysis of this part will

10、be analyzed later. 2.3. Validity Analysis Briefly, the validity of a test is the extent to which it measures what it is supposed to measure and nothing else. Every test, whether it is a short, informal classroom test or a public examination, should be as valid as the constructor can make it (Heaton,

11、 2000). There are several measures examining validity of a test such as face validity, content validity, concurrent validity, predicative validity, response validity and construct validity.The following graph shows the correlation coefficients among different parts as well as between each part and t

12、he total score of this test paper. Graph3相关性相关性LCMCQClozeRCTBRWritingTSPearson 相关性1.453*.291.485*.644*.476*.829*显著性(双侧).003.069.002.000.002.000LCN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.453*1.284.346*.158-.105.497*显著性(双侧) .003.076.029.330.521.001MCQN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.291.2841.391*.181-.020.475*显著性(双侧) .06

13、9.076.013.265.902.002ClozeN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.485*.346*.391*1.248.363*.813*显著性(双侧) .002.029.013.124.021.000RCN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.644*.158.181.2481.515*.656*显著性(双侧) .000.330.265.124.001.000TBRN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.476*-.105-.020.363*.515*1.600*显著性(双侧) .002.521.902.021.001.000Writin

14、gN40404040404040Pearson 相关性.829*.497*.475*.813*.656*.600*1TS显著性(双侧) .000.001.002.000.000.000N40404040404040*. 在 .01 水平(双侧)上显著相关。*. 在 0.05 水平(双侧)上显著相关。According to Ferguson (2006), the correlation coefficients between each part and total score should be higher than 0.7 and the correlation between par

15、ts should be 0.30.6. The above graph shows that the part-total correlation coefficients of the test paper is not very satisfactory, only the correlation coefficients between reading comprehension or listening comprehension and the total score are above 0.7. What more, the correlation coefficients be

16、tween parts is not satisfied with the standard of 0.3-0.6, which indicates that the construct validity of this test paper is very low. 3. Detail Analysis about Reading ComprehensionThis part consists of three passages, the first passage is just an introduction about the American Museum of National History, the second one is a brief introduction about Tea, and the third one is about the celebrity Li Shizhen. The total score of this part is 30 point, which occupi

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 学术论文 > 毕业论文

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号