2020年Legal and Equitable Remedies

上传人:啥**** 文档编号:148920229 上传时间:2020-10-23 格式:DOC 页数:2 大小:25KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
2020年Legal and Equitable Remedies_第1页
第1页 / 共2页
2020年Legal and Equitable Remedies_第2页
第2页 / 共2页
亲,该文档总共2页,全部预览完了,如果喜欢就下载吧!
资源描述

《2020年Legal and Equitable Remedies》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2020年Legal and Equitable Remedies(2页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、文档来源于网络,如有重复请自行下载Legal and Equitable Remediesfrom:Other parts ofthe criminal code may in some jurisdictions allow stiffer penalties for repeat offenders.Punish-ment for the most serious offenses,or felonies,is more severe than for misdemeanors. In civil actions,most American courts are authorized to

2、 choose among legal and equitable remedies.The distinction means less today than in the past but is still worth under-standing.In 13th century England,”courts of law” were authorized to dcree monetary remedies only.If a defendants breach ofcontract cost the plaintiff 50,such a court could order the

3、defendant to pay that sum to the plaintiff.These damages were sufficient in many instances,but not in others,such as a contract for thesale of a rare artwork or a specific par-cel ofland.During the 13th and 14th centuries,”courts of equity”wereformed.These tribunals fashioned equitable remedies like

4、 specific per-formance,which compelled parties to perform their obligations,rather than merely forcing them to pay damages for the injury caused by their nonperformance.By the 19th century, most American jurisdictions had eliminated the distinction between law and equity.Today,with rare excep-tions,

5、U.S.courts can award either legal or equitable remedies as the situation requires. One famous example illustrates the differences between civil and criminal law,and the remedies that each can offer.The state ofCalifornia charged the former football star O.J.Simpson with murder.Had Simpson been con-v

6、icted,he would have been impris-oned.He was not convicted,however,as the jury ruled the prosecution failed to prove Simpsons guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.Afterwards,Mrs.Simpsons family sued Simpson fowrongful death,a civil action.The jury in this case determined that a preponderance ofthe evidence demonstrated Simpsons responsibility for the death ofhis wife.It ordered Simpson to pay money damages legal remedy to the plaintiffs. 2

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 法律文献 > 法律文书

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号