《2020年(发展战略)科技发展_》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2020年(发展战略)科技发展_(11页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、第一篇文章Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.题目分析:核心概念是技术的发展,人们如何利用这些发展(实际上就是人们如何面对它)这两点如何在社会中影响。题目给出了讨论方向,即要考虑到人们在科技的影响下越来越孤独的问题。题目限定了时间范围是当代。注:深红色的字代表论点性语言,是文章论证的核心。其中的关键字我用粗体表示
2、。实际上文章的观点只用这些深红色的字就够了,不信的话大家可以把所有深红色的字提出来,全文的脉络就清晰可辨了,如同人的脊梁骨。黑色的字代表支撑论点的语言。这里有些是例证,有些是推理证明,个别的有指路标性质的文字我加粗了。黑色字的作用是使文章更佳的丰满,让人信服。推理证明就像骨头(小骨头非脊梁骨),例证就像是肉。最终组成了有血有肉的文章。Technology, broadly defined as the use of tools, has a long history. Ever since Erg the caveman first conked an animal with a rock,
3、people have been using technology. For thousands of years, the use of tools allowed people to move ever closer together. Because fields could be cultivated and the technology to store food existed, people would live in cities rather than in small nomadic tribes. 前面的几句话都是在介绍大的背景,即技术在现在这样的社会中有哪些影响,这很明
4、显是在点题目中的“modern civilizations ”,很好的介绍了文章所限制的范围有哪些特点。从文字上来看,黑色的句子与棕色的句子的意思是完全一样的,区别就是一个更加抽象,一个更加具体,后者是通过具体的例子来解释前者的。这两者都是必不可少的。我们在写作文的时候是不是会忘记写两者中的其中一部分呢?Only very lately have Ergs descendants come to question the benefits of technology. 这个very lately用的很好,第一它再一次的点题了,很好的紧扣题目,第二它与第一句话中所介绍出来的背景遥相呼应,使得前后
5、的连接很顺当。本句以及以后几句就开始提出与第一句话相反的意见了,但是只是将现象提出来,并没有具体展开任何观点。The Industrial Revolution introduced and spread technologies that mechanized many tasks. As a result of the drive toward more efficient production and distribution (so the ever larger cities would be supported), people began to act as cogs in th
6、e technological machine. Clothing was no longer produced by groups of women sewing and gossiping together, but by down-trodden automations operating machinery in grim factories.开头段分为两个部分,一部分写优点,后一部分转而写有质疑。很好的暗示了文章的结构。我们可以清晰地知道作者的思路,并期待他在后面进行展开。并且通过细节处比如修饰语中的扣题,使得文章很好的紧扣题目。没有任何模版的痕迹。The benefits of t
7、he new technology of today, computers and the internet, are particularly ambiguous. They have made work ever more efficient and knit the world together in a web of information and phone lines. Some visionaries speak of a world in which Erg need not check in to his office; he can just dial in from ho
8、me. He wont need to go to a bar to pick up women because there are all those chat rooms. Hungry? Erg orders his groceries from an online delivery service. Bored? Download a new game. And yet.本段第一句话质疑科技带来的好处,这一句话引领出本段以及下一段。可以看作是一个过渡句。这里文章与开头段落的衔接非常好,我们看:ambiguous不正是照应了question吗?正是因为ambiguous人们才会quest
9、ion阿。本段的主题句实际上是第二句话。强调了科技的好的地方,使效率更高,人们之间的联系更加紧密了。后面的四个例子分别证明了这一点。这里,有一点我想说的,就是关于例子的使用,在awintro中明确说了要怎么用例子来支持观点:要么用几个例子,要么用一个可以延伸的例子。我们看这篇文章Erg这个词的频繁使用,这样的一个无限延伸的大例子不正是使文章连贯、论证有力的法宝吗。同时,本段最后用了四个事例,实际上都是用erg给串连起来的,也包括下一段。安排的顺序:事业=朋友=生存=娱乐,一步一步地指向个人的内心世界,人的精神层面。Many people, myself included, are a litt
10、le queasy about that vision. Erg may be doing work, but is it real work? Are his online friends real friends? Does anything count in a spiritual way if its just digital? 本段主要讲科技进步的负面,与上一段首句相照应。很好的承接了上一段落的内容。同时,在例子论证方面,与上一段的每一个点都有照应。一步一步的将上一段质疑。这种釜底抽薪的质疑使得上一段看似很牛的证明崩溃。同志们看出来本文这种可延伸的一个大例子的威力了吧,在证明过程中那
11、么的有力,在反驳过程中那么的彻底,而且连成一串使得总效果增加不少,这比单独的列几个不相干的例子要有效的多。Since the Industrial Revolution, we have been haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, soulless. The newest technologies, we fear, are making us flat as our screens, turning us into streams of bits of i
12、nterchangeable data. We may know a lot of people, but we have few real friends. We have a lot of things to do, but no reason to do them. 上面两句都是对上面棕红色字的解释,并且是从不同层面的进行的刻画。第一句是对上一句的efficient、productive的解释,其中we fear不正是对应了haunt吗,第二句是对应于soulless的解释。其中第二句是重点,因为下一自然段讨论的就是他。In short, the new technology empha
13、sizes a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time.这一句话既是总结了上面所有的关于现状的描述,同时,也作为承上启下的过度句,逐步地将讨论深化至精神层面,从而自然的引出下一段作者自己的观点。As I try to unravel which I believe about the relative merits of technology, I think it is instructive to remember technologys original result. 前两段都是作者分析现有的情况,分析题目
14、中所给出的条件。而这一段则是作者提出自己的观点,并且使得文章的论述深入到本质。实际上这个就是作者的立场,这样的定立场的方式很好啊,第二段第三段分别分析了原文的立场和反对原文的立场,可是作者并没有同意任何一个,也没有部分同意。本段从科技本质出发,倾向于说科技的不好,但是不带批评色彩,很聪明的另辟蹊径,指向本源。这就避免了冲突。显出自己的睿智。A better plow meant easier farming, more food, longer lives, and more free time to pursue other things such as art. Our newest te
15、chnology does not give us more free time; it consumes our free time. 这两句话是一层,通过plow的例子解释了本质。前一句举出事实,后一句进行分析,指出本质是占用了我们的空闲时间,直接指向科技的本质(正如最后一段说的,这本质就是科技与生活的失衡)。We are terminally distracted from confronting ourselves or each other. We stay safe, and lonely, in our homes and offices rather than taking t
16、he risk of meeting real people or trying new things.这两句话是第二层,说明我们相互之间缺少了沟通和交流。直接指向科技的本质(正如最后一段说的,这本质就是科技与生活的失衡)。While I am certainly not a Luddite, I do believe we need to look for a bit more balance between technology and life. 本句话是全文的中心,前面几段都是铺垫,先说科技好和不好的方面,然后指向本质。本段不仅点出本质,而且给出了进一步的解决思路。(打个比方,这样的论证方式就像是老师去差学生家访,先说“你这孩子挺爱劳动的啊是个好孩子”,然后说“可是学习怎么那么差呢怎么老爱打架呢”,最后说本质“老赵阿其实我知道你工作太忙了,又要评职称又要炒股票没工夫顾孩子。不过为了孩子,还是多抽出点时间关心下吧”,这样的论证结构下来,从表及内,让人感觉很有说服力!)We have to tear o