《国际期刊投稿介绍与注意事项.ppt》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《国际期刊投稿介绍与注意事项.ppt（29页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、国际期刊投稿介绍与注意事项国际期刊投稿介绍与注意事项投稿程序投稿程序审稿流程审稿流程出版时间出版时间ISI主编指出的中国稿件的常见问题主编指出的中国稿件的常见问题论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例1、选择一本目标期刊、选择一本目标期刊 关键词检索关键词检索2、浏览期刊主页、浏览期刊主页 编辑队伍、作者指南（范围，类型，长度，格编辑队伍、作者指南（范围，类型，长度，格式）、范文式）、范文作者指南作者指南范文范文编辑队伍编辑队伍 标题标题: 最少、充分 摘要摘要: 报道型、指示型、结构型结构型(Structured abstract) Purpose 目的 Design/methodology/
2、approach 方法论 Findings 结果 Research limitations/implications (选择性的) 研究局限性 Practical implications (选择性的) 实用价值 Originality/value 原创性/意义 关键词:不超过6个 论文类型论文类型:7种 正文正文:字数限制4,0006,000单词、论文风格 参考文献参考文献: 哈佛格式哈佛格式、MLA(人文科学)、APA(心理学、教育学)等 论文准备论文准备-以以Emerald 投稿为例投稿为例3、修改论文格式要求、修改论文格式要求-参考参考Author GuidelinesAuthor G
3、uidelinesMilorad M. Novicevic, Mario Hayek, Tony Fang, (2011) Integrating Barnards and contemporary views of industrial relations and HRM, Journal of Management History, Vol. 17 Iss: 1, pp.126 - 138 AbstractPurpose The purpose of this paper is to juxtapose the contemporary views of industrial relati
4、ons (IR) and human resource management (HRM) with the ideas expressed by Chester Barnard. Design/methodology/approach The paper analyzes Chester Barnards views along the four premises that underlie contemporary perspectives on the fields of IR and HRM. Findings Barnards main points: that sincerity a
5、nd honesty of management is crucial to developing an individual employees will to collaborate, and that collective cooperation is superior to collective bargaining are found to resonate well with the contemporary views and provide a clear indication for Barnards preference of human resource perspect
6、ive to the IR perspective. Practical implications This paper provides Barnards practical insights into why managing IR and HR by policies leads to poor management. Originality/value This paper is the first to recognize Barnards unique contribution to contemporary perspectives on IR and HRM disciplin
7、es.Keywords: Employee relations, Human resource management, Industrial relations, Organizations 结构性文摘举例Paper type-7种论文类型 Case studyLiteraturereview ViewpointGeneral reviewTechnical paperResearchpaper Conceptualpaper参考文献举例-数量；时间；质量4、准备、准备Article title page-从从Author guidelines 下载下载 准备单独的文档提交 匿名评审 论文所有
8、作者信息、个人简介、以及论文题目和摘要等建议建议随附上随附上covering letter ，应该包括，应该包括2条有效信息：条有效信息：a.陈述为什么要向这本期刊投稿，如果您的文章与众不同，或者超出了期刊的范围b.阐述本文是否引用或参考了与其主题相似但已发表在其他期刊上的论文恰当的covering letter应如此表述：I am submitting this article to Journal of Documentation. You will see that it deals with public library management, which I appreciate i
9、s outside JDocs normal scope. However, it focuses on the novel application of a theoretical model to the topic, and hence I think it is appropriate for JDoc.I am submitting an article with a similar title to Public Library Journal. However, that article gives a series of case studies, rather than de
10、scribing and applying the model, and so is quite distinct from the paper submitted here. I can send a copy of the PLJ paper if required.不建议使用的covering letter:I am sending this article for you to publish in Journal of Documentation, after your editorial amendments. I have chosen JDoc to publish this
11、paper, as it is a high-impact and well-regarded journal. 论文准备-以Emerald 投稿为例Article Title page & Covering Letter论文准备论文准备 - 在线提交系统在线提交系统ScholarOne5、选择正确投稿途径、选择正确投稿途径 Authors Guidelines ScholarOne 在线提交系统 Email 提交主编邮箱论文准备论文准备 - 在线提交系统在线提交系统ScholarOne论文评审状态示例论文评审状态示例: :论文审稿流程论文审稿流程自我评审自我评审：提交前的工作审稿方式：审稿方
12、式：两轮匿名双盲评审审稿周期：审稿周期：从提交到收到初次反馈;33.5个月发表周期3个月、1年不等审稿结果：审稿结果：拒绝原因和后续调整修改如何修改你的论文？再次提交：再次提交：修改时间，随附修改NotesSpot the error:“A knew research methodology introduced in 2007”论文评审论文评审-自我评审自我评审仔细检查文章，不要有拼写错误和不完整的参考文仔细检查文章，不要有拼写错误和不完整的参考文献。没有万无一失的拼写检查工具。献。没有万无一失的拼写检查工具。我们很难发现自己文章的不足之处，让其他人来阅我们很难发现自己文章的不足之处，让其他
13、人来阅读你的文章读你的文章将你的文稿送给一个或几个朋友、将你的文稿送给一个或几个朋友、同事或其他人，征求他们对文章的意见、建议和批同事或其他人，征求他们对文章的意见、建议和批评。评。论文评审论文评审-拒稿的原因拒稿的原因未遵从投稿说明- 作者指南缺乏适用性，跟所投期刊内容不符质量问题- 不恰当的方法论，不合理不严谨，文章过长等贡献不足- 没有拓展该领域的研究，对现有研究的微小延伸摆正心态摆正心态 在商业和管理领域至少有在商业和管理领域至少有50%的稿件会被拒绝。的稿件会被拒绝。每位作者至少都会有一次退稿经历。每位作者至少都会有一次退稿经历。询问原因询问原因 仔细倾听仔细倾听 大多数的编辑都会对
14、退稿给出详细的大多数的编辑都会对退稿给出详细的意见，认真的倾听编辑的陈述。意见，认真的倾听编辑的陈述。再试一次再试一次 完善稿件，投给其它相关的目标期刊完善稿件，投给其它相关的目标期刊被拒稿的积极因素：被拒稿的积极因素：得到鼓励，继续提高稿件质量得到鼓励，继续提高稿件质量宝贵的投稿经历，更多了解系统流程宝贵的投稿经历，更多了解系统流程如果文章被如果文章被拒绝拒绝论文评审论文评审-如何修改你的论文？如何修改你的论文？p联系编辑，明确修改的联系编辑，明确修改的期限期限p如果对评审意见有疑问，要同编辑确认你的如果对评审意见有疑问，要同编辑确认你的理解理解是否正确是否正确p征求同事或合作者的意见，对要
15、求修改的部分征求同事或合作者的意见，对要求修改的部分进行完善进行完善p保证在规定时间内完成修改保证在规定时间内完成修改p在修改稿前附一封信，在修改稿前附一封信，逐条说明逐条说明修改结果，如果没有修改修改结果，如果没有修改也要说明理由也要说明理由Revision NotesBetter grounding of the problem. Parts of the front-end of the paper read like a tutorial-like introduction of action research. In a rewrite, there are two things t
16、hat I would like to see instead.I would expect a clearer attempt to establish the research-practice gap as an intellectual challenge. This is the main theme of the paper and it would therefore be useful to substantiate your understanding of this gap beyond the surface level.Next commentYou imply tha
17、t you do not wish to see a tutorial to CAR (even though one reviewer thinks that this is needed since some sections of the MISQ readership may not be familiar with CAR). We concur with you and have removed the tutorial aspects. The front end of the paper (pages 2-5) has been revised in order to outl
18、ine the research and practical problems that we focused on.We agree that the research-practice gap needs to be positioned clearly as an intellectual challenge (as highlighted on page 3). We have now deliberately positioned the paper in this way with the challenge manifested in the action-research di
19、chotomy, where either action or research tends to be the focus of action research projects (as explained on page 3). We also substantiate our arguments better in the broader CAR literature (as detailed from pages 5-14). Next response123Ref # Reviewer CommentAuthor Response期刊稿件评审流程期刊稿件评审流程Author pack
20、s一本纸本期刊一本纸本期刊所有期刊电子版所有期刊电子版3个月免费访问权个月免费访问权Literati network 评奖Tips无版面费、无审稿费无版面费、无审稿费先阅读几期论文，再动笔撰写正文前，可先向主编提交撰写正文前，可先向主编提交大纲或摘要大纲或摘要，节省双方时间，节省双方时间英语语言很重要，合作作者、第三者评审获取文中非原创文字、图标或图片的相关版权许可相关版权许可文中表格需要单独文档提交文中表格需要单独文档提交供作者参考其他资源()作者专栏作者专栏学者园地学者园地怎样找到合作者？怎样找到合作者？导师或同事会议参会人员期刊作者Emerald学者网络平台优势：优势：第一作者显示研究的
21、权威性与严谨性对跨学科研究有特殊作用跨领域的学术跨领域的学术- -合作者合作者Voices from editorsThe authors from China do ignore the submission guidelines then try to negotiate the word length and other issues. This is difficult for editors. In several cases they have refused to shorten their papers to the 6,000 word limit. In one case
22、an author said that if I wanted to cut the paper I could eliminate the references. This week I received a paper that was 20,000 words, and the author complained when I returned it. I let them know that the guidelines are not negotiable, but the Chinese authors are the only ones in the world that pro
23、test the requests for changes. This has been very surprising. that we simply dont understand; following instructions (for example, structured abstract) is still a problem.the major issue relates to the fact that most papers do not contribute to the field and scope of the journal. Paper are either a
24、plug and play (replication of previous studies) , data crunching statistical analysis with no implications and/or papers that do not fit the scope of the journal papers by Chinese authors are more likely to contain English grammar problems, not conform to the required research paper structure, are w
25、eak in research training and writing for international journals, lack a critical analysis of the related studies, I suggest they always work with an experienced native speaking copy-editor, or better, a co-author experienced in publishing in high-level scientific journals. Another limitation of Chin
26、ese papers is that they often fail to provide a conceptual or theoretical basis for their hypotheses. Lack novel practical or theoretical contributions have weak English be methodologically simplistic replicate Western research findings in China without considering the indigenous Chinese contextVoic
27、es from editorsVoices from editorsI believe this is because there is a stress to people to publish in order to publish and not for conducting innovative researchFirst let me say that we do not have huge numbers of submissions from China as we did in the past, because word has spread that we come dow
28、n very hard on plagiarism.Manuscripts from Asia in general, and China in particular are often more literature-driven than issue-driven. By this I mean that Chinese authors will sometimes review the literature on a specific topic or group of topics and develop hypotheses or models with the justificat
29、ion being that the hypotheses or models proposed have never been proposed or tested. True, the hypotheses/models may be novel but this does not mean that they are worthwhile or make any meaningful contribution to theory or practice. 总结：总结：Problems:Ignore the submission guidelines, not conform to req
30、uired paper structureSimplistic replicate western research findings in China without the indigenous Chinese contextLack of managerial implications, poor literature reviewsPlagiarism and multi-journal submission issuesLack novel practical and theoretical contributions for their hypothesesPoor English
31、, grammar problemsNot fit to scope of the journalMore literature-driven than issue-drivenSuggestions:lHave papers read by senior experienced scholars before submissionlWork with an experienced native speaking copy-editor, or a co-author experienced in publishing in high-level scientific journalslAtt
32、end international leading conferences and network with international researcherslRead target journal thoroughly and submit to only that journallUse your university emailEmerald的中国作者的中国作者已有近近5000名中国学者名中国学者撰写的论文在Emerald期刊上发表。其中，1300多名学者多名学者的文章在核心刊物上发表。Emerald 学术支持学术支持我们的发展与学科的进步息息相关我们的发展与学科的进步息息相关管理学研究基金：3000图书馆学研究基金： 2000优秀博士论文奖： 1500更多信息： 该奖项的学者3.Covering Letter(附信):参与者姓名、联系方式、项目名称等4.Proposal (项目建议书):2,000英文单词、目标、结果、效益、预算等提交方式： 在线提交奖励奖励：奖金+证书+CMS期刊访问权+IACMR会员一年 优胜奖1名 2,000 高度赞扬奖1-2名 500-1,期待与您合作，加入Emerald成为作者、编委、评审人、主编！如果您有任何疑问，欢迎您联系：Emerald 编辑支持主管 徐欢电话：010-8225 Thank You！
