《历年考研英语真题及答案解析(1980-2010年)》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《历年考研英语真题及答案解析(1980-2010年)（49页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、252010年全国硕士研究生入学统一考试英语试题Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on ANSWER SHEET 1. (10 points)In 1924 Americas National Research Council sent two engineers to supervise a series of industrial experiments at a l
2、arge telephone-parts factory called the Hawthorne Plant near Chicago. It hoped they would learn how stop-floor lighting - workers productivity. Instead, the studies ended - giving their name to the Hawthorne effect, the extremely influential idea that the very - to being experimented upon changed su
3、bjects behavior.The idea arose because of the - behavior of the women in the Hawthorne plant. According to - of the experiments, their hourly output rose when lighting was increased, but also when it was dimmed. It did not - what was done in the experiment; - something was changed, productivity rose
4、. A(n) - that they were being experimented upon seemed to be - to alter workers behavior - itself.After several decades, the same data were - to econometric the analysis. Hawthorne experiments has another surprise store -the descriptions on record, no systematic - was found that levels of productivi
5、ty were related to changes in lighting.It turns out that peculiar way of conducting the experiments may be have let to - interpretation of what happed. -, lighting was always changed on a Sunday. When work started again on Monday, output - rose compared with the previous Saturday and - to rise for t
6、he next couple of days. -, a comparison with data for weeks when there was no experimentation showed that output always went up on Monday, workers - to be diligent for the first few days of the week in any case, before - a plateau and then slackening off. This suggests that the alleged Hawthorne eff
7、ect is hard to pin down.1.A affectedB achievedC extractedD restored2.A atB upC withD off3.A truthB sightC actD proof4.A controversialB perplexingC mischievousD ambiguous5.A requirementsB explanationsC accountsD assessments6.A concludeB matterC indicateD work7.A as far asB for fear thatC in case that
8、D so long as8.A awarenessB expectationC sentimentD illusion9.A suitableB excessiveC enoughD abundant10.A aboutB forC onD by11.A comparedB shownC subjectedD conveyed12.A contrary toB consistent withC parallel withD peculiar to13.A evidenceB guidanceC implicationD source14.A disputableB enlighteningC
9、reliableD misleading15.A In contrastB For exampleC In consequenceD As usual16.A dulyB accidentallyC unpredictablyD suddenly17.A failedB ceasedC startedD continued20.A breakingB climbingC surpassingD hittingSection IIReading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the ques
10、tions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1. (40 points)Text 1Of all the changes that have taken place in English-language newspapers during the past quarter-century, perhaps the most far-reaching has been the inexorable decline in the scope and seriousness of
11、 their arts coverage. It is difficult to the point of impossibility for the average reader under the age of forty to imagine a time when high-quality arts criticism could be found in most big-city newspapers. Yet a considerable number of the most significant collections of criticism published in the
12、 20th century consisted in large part of newspaper reviews. To read such books today is to marvel at the fact that their learned contents were once deemed suitable for publication in general-circulation dailies.We are even farther removed from the unfocused newspaper reviews published in England bet
13、ween the turn of the 20th century and the eve of World War II, at a time when newsprint was dirt-cheap and stylish arts criticism was considered an ornament to the publications in which it appeared. In those far-off days, it was taken for granted that the critics of major papers would write in detai
14、l and at length about the events they covered. Theirs was a serious business, and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly, like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman, could be trusted to know what they were about. These men believed in journalism as a calling, and were proud to be publi
15、shed in the daily press. “So few authors have brains enough or literary gift enough to keep their own end up in journalism,” Newman wrote, “that I am tempted to define journalism as a term of contempt applied by writers who are not read to writers who are.”Unfortunately, these critics are virtually forgotten. Neville Cardus, who wrote for the Manchester Guardian from 1917 until shortly before his death in 1975, is now
