《GMAT新黄金80题及作文(五)(6).docx》由会员分享，可在线阅读，更多相关《GMAT新黄金80题及作文(五)(6).docx（3页珍藏版）》请在金锄头文库上搜索。
1、 GMAT新黄金80题及作文(五)(6)Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.“一个公司里全部的个人评价都应当是多方面的，即组织内各个层面的人员不但应当评价他们的下属也应当评价他们的上司。” 1， 只有上对下简单产生腐败和上层的官僚主义 bureaucratism2， 过程会耗
2、时和繁杂3， 设计一种好的高效的评价体系 The speaker asserts that employees at all levels in an organization should review one another, including those working “over” them as well as “under” them. I agree in part. Often companies will conduct two different kinds of periodic review, one to justify decisions regarding pr
3、omotion and pay, and another to increase overall efficiency by assessing employee performance. Multi-directional evaluation should never be part of the first kind of review; however, it can be valuable in the second kind and, therefore, should be used there.On the one hand, lower-level employees hav
4、e too much organizational power if their evaluations are used in decisions about the pay or promotions of their superiors. Employees can intimidate superiors with the threat of bad review. Also employees can use the review process to retaliate against those at higher levels. In either case, the auth
5、ority of a manager or an executive can be seriously compromised, and productivity is lost in the process.On the other hand, the most revealing criticisms of a superiors style often come from those subject to it. In a process of review that isnt connected to promotion or pay, employees at all levels
6、can be more comfortable and forthright about sharing concerns. In turn, every employee is more likely to get accurate feedback, including constructive criticism, that will help each nurture strengths and improve areas of weakness. In this way (adv. 这样), multi-directional evaluation can greatly enhan
7、ce organizational efficiency.Furthermore, multi-directional evaluation in this context helps prevent worker alienation and subsequent lowered productivity. Widening the performance review process will very likely foster a greater sense of personal involvement in ones work, especially among lower-lev
8、el employees. Recent studies have shown that people who feel more invested (invest: b: to furnish with power or authority; c: to grant someone control or authority over: VEST) in their jobs tend to work more cooperatively and productively.In conclusion, there is an important role for multi-directional personnel evaluation in the workplace. While it should be clearly separate from issues of promotion and pay, as part of the performance review process it can encourage better employee relations and higher productivity.
