SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx

上传人:工**** 文档编号:551616332 上传时间:2023-08-28 格式:DOCX 页数:13 大小:25.44KB
返回 下载 相关 举报
SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx_第1页
第1页 / 共13页
SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx_第2页
第2页 / 共13页
SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx_第3页
第3页 / 共13页
SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx_第4页
第4页 / 共13页
SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx_第5页
第5页 / 共13页
点击查看更多>>
资源描述

《SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx》由会员分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《SCI-审稿意见回复范文.docx(13页珍藏版)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

1、论文题目:Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies on the antivirus effects of A (一种中草药) against virus B (一种病毒)所投杂志:Life Sciences投稿结果:这次大修后又经过一次小修,被接受发表编辑信内容(注:有删节):Dear Mr. XXX,Your manuscript has been examined by the editors and qualified referee . We think the manuscript has merit but requires revi

2、sion before we can accept it for publication in the Journal. Careful consideration must be given to the points raised in the reviewer comments, which are enclosed below. If you choose to submit a revision of your manuscript, please incorporate responses to the reviewer comments into the revised pape

3、r. A complete rebuttal with no manuscript alterations is usually considered inadequate and may result in lengthy re-review procedures. A letter detailing your revisions point-by-point must accompany the resubmission. You will be requested to upload this Response to Reviewers as a separate file in th

4、e Attach Files area.We ask that you resubmit your manuscript within 45 days. After this time, your file will be placed on inactive status and a further submission will be considered a new manuscript.To submit a revision, go to http:/ and log in as an Author. You will see a menu item called Submissio

5、n Needing Revision. You will find your submission record there. Yours sincerely,Joseph J. Bahl, PhDEditorLife SciencesFormat Suggestion: Please access the Guide to Authors at our website to check the format of your article. Pay particular attention to our References style.Reviewers comments:Reviewer

6、 #1:XXXXX (略)Reviewer #2:XXXXX (略)Editors note and suggestions: (注:编辑的建议)Title: Re-write the title to read more smoothly in contemporary English Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of the antiviral effects of A against virus B.Abstract: Re-write the abstract to read more smoothly.A, an alkal

7、oid isolated from C (注:一种中草药), was tested for antiviral activity against virus B. Both in vitro and in vivo assays along with serum pharmacological experiments showed A to have potent antiviral activity. The pharmacokinetic profile of A in Sprague/Dawley rat plasma after oral administration was meas

8、ured by HPLC. Blood samples taken at selected time points were analyzed to study potential changes in antiviral pharmacodynamics as measured by infectivity of viruses. From the similarity of the serum concentration profiles and antiviral activity profiles it is concluded that A it self, rather than

9、a metabolite, exerted the effect against the virus prior to bioinactivation. The need for effective clinical agents against virus B and these results suggest the possibility of benefit from further experiments with A.The authors should check to be sure that the terms blood samples, plasma and serum

10、are always used appropriately throughout the abstract and text.Introduction: some sentences can be made less passive. example 1st paragraph A appears to be the most important alkaloid isolated from the plant, its structural formula is shown in Fig 1. . While it produced a general inhibition of antib

11、ody production lymphocyte proliferation was stimulated (Xia and Wang, 1997). These pharmacological properties suggest a potential use in the treatment of viral myocarditis against virus B that could be studied in experiments in cell culture and animals.The authors should check the entire manuscript

12、for spelling errors (example given: in your text alkaloid is incorrectly spelled alkaloid)The authors should read the guidelines to the authors and not include the first name of the authors being cited in the text. In the reference section the first name should be abbreviated as shown in the guideli

13、ne to authors (thus the earlier text reference should be (Liu et al., 2003)and the remaining one should be (Chen et al., 2002)The authors instead of directly answering the first complex question of reviewer #1 may include the three questions as future research aim in the discussion section.Rather th

14、an redrawing figure the authors may choose to amend the wording of the statistical analysis section to state that the result of tables are means +-SEM and for figures are +- SD. reviewer #1 comment number 8 and reviewer # 2 comment 3 might be satisfied by inclusion of a representative photo of cells

15、 and heart showing CPE. Remember most readers of the journal have never seen what you are trying to describe. Because I think that you can deal with all of the points raised I am hoping to see a revised manuscript that you have carefully checked for errors. If you have questions or do not know how t

16、o respond to any of the points raised please contact me at bahlu.arizona.edu Joseph Bahl, PhD Editor 2 Life Sciences作者回复信原稿:Dear Dr. Bahl,Im (注:正式信函不要简写)very appreciate (注:不适合作为给编辑回信的开始,同时有语法错误)for your comments and suggestions. I (注:实际上是学生做的)have conducted in vivo antivirus experiments again (注:要表明是应审稿人或编辑建议而作). Mice were sacrificed on 15 days and 30 days after i

展开阅读全文
相关资源
正为您匹配相似的精品文档
相关搜索

最新文档


当前位置:首页 > 生活休闲 > 社会民生

电脑版 |金锄头文库版权所有
经营许可证:蜀ICP备13022795号 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号